08-23-2025, 11:12 AM
❮
❯
|
08-23-2025, 11:22 AM
(08-23-2025, 11:16 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: "Common sense, I dont presume guilty without evidence, I dont judge with a biased heart. Until I see tangible evidence why would I think otherwise? Seems the right thing to do, dont you think?"
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
08-23-2025, 11:28 AM
(08-23-2025, 11:22 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Not if the evidence is being buried The keyword there is if. There's no evidence of that either that I can find tangible. I need Tangible. That is me. Thats all. To do otherwise, I would say, is prejudice by definition. Life is precious, how can someone condemn another without being beyond a doubt.
08-23-2025, 11:35 AM
(08-23-2025, 11:28 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: The keyword there is if. There's no evidence of that either that I can find tangible. I need Tangible. That is me. Thats all. To do otherwise, I would say, is prejudice by definition. Thing is, if the evidence isn't their because it's being hidden? Kind of the point behind all this.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
(08-23-2025, 10:53 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Well, then, it seems we have, an Accord? Ha, more like... a détente I just thought you might offer some free/uncharged professional legal insight, as opposed to my years of experience watching Law and Order Neither Deny Ignorance(as far as I know) nor I were looking to put you on retainer... The NDAs are just one of the wild cards...
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent But change is Professor Neil Ellwood Peart ![]() |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|




![[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/PEART-2744335652.gif)

