DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

John Bolton former national security advisor raided
(08-22-2025, 04:49 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Ha! Ha!

How convenient is that?!!!!

I wonder where she would have been sent if she had told another story? 

Probably to meet Jeffrey if we are honest.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(08-22-2025, 04:49 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Ha! Ha!

How convenient is that?!!!!

Yes, but when else was it supposed to be released? and

So this evidence is inadmissible?

https://www.justice.gov/maxwell-interview

Then what evidence can we use, Mr Prosecutor...

If Ghisleline suggested Trump was neck deep, would you be so dismissive?

I suggest the prosecution needs to read the whole interview... while perusing the files we do have, if there were any consistencies they will no doubt be discovered and pointed out...

You know, like researching instead of pure emotional speculation...

FWIW, Im thinking he is protecting someone, that doesn't preclude him being a sleazebag, but absent more evidence  
you wouldn't have enough evidence to get a grand jury much less an indictment.

Again, if the Dems had the cheese, they should have shared it when they had control.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is 
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart 
 
[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]

 
(08-22-2025, 05:00 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Yes, but when else was it supposed to be released? and

So this evidence is inadmissible?

https://www.justice.gov/maxwell-interview

Then what evidence can we use, Mr Prosecutor...

If Ghisleline suggested Trump was neck deep, would you be so dismissive?

I suggest the prosecution needs to read the whole interview... while perusing the files we do have, if there were any consistencies they will no doubt be discovered and pointed out...

You know, like researching instead of pure emotional speculation...

FWIW, Im thinking he is protecting someone, that doesn't preclude him being a sleazebag, but absent more evidence  
you wouldn't have enough evidence to get a grand jury much less an indictment.

Again, if the Dems had the cheese, they should have shared it when they had control.



Oh.

You leap to his defence , again.

Mr Defence Counsel?

I bow to your obviously superior legal knowledge.

Toke on....
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(08-22-2025, 05:35 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Oh.

You leap to his defence , again.

Mr Defence Counsel?

I bow to your obviously superior legal knowledge.

Toke on....

Come on, man, Im asking seriously FFS

Is this admissible evidence? or not

As a prosecutor, read the interview. How would you counter it?

because now we have two material witnesses saying they never saw Trump do anything illegal or even do anything sleazy.

Thats what I find impossible to believe...FWIW, but here we are with corroborative witnesses

Or is this where you can't be bothered to offer your input to DI, EVEN with your legal training and obvious expertise...


C3

@C_3C_3
·
3h

Well well well… So now Virginia Giuffre (RIP) and Ghislaine Maxwell claim Trump is innocent. Read this. Share it. This is not going to work out the way the Left thinks it will.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is 
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart 
 
[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]

 
(08-22-2025, 05:45 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Come on, man, Im asking seriously FFS

Is this admissible evidence? or not

As a prosecutor, read the interview. How would you counter it?

because now we have two material witnesses saying they never saw Trump do anything illegal or even do anything sleazy.

Thats what I find impossible to believe...FWIW, but here we are with corroborative witnesses

Or is this where you can't be bothered to offer your input to DI, EVEN with your legal training and obvious expertise...


C3

@C_3C_3
·
3h

Well well well… So now Virginia Giuffre (RIP) and Ghislaine Maxwell claim Trump is innocent. Read this. Share it. This is not going to work out the way the Left thinks it will.



I'm not the left.

You, are gullible.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(08-22-2025, 04:19 PM)putnam6 Wrote: FWIW Breaking News 

Nick Sortor

@nicksortor

BREAKING: Ghislaine Maxwell CONFIRMS she “NEVER” witnessed President Trump “in any inappropriate setting in any way.” The leftist narrative is in SHAMBLES.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...AYMaF.jpeg]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...ARKyy.jpeg]

MAGAs quoting Maxwell as a reliable source, now?
(08-22-2025, 06:07 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote:
(08-22-2025, 06:07 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: I'm not the left.

You, are gullible.

Yeah so what.. Mr Prosecutor,

Im not Trump's buddy, but it doesn't keep you from regurgitating in every thread sooner or later

So you aren't even going to put on your powdered wig for a moment, and dazzle us in your legal briefs...

figures... 


His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is 
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart 
 
[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]

 
(08-22-2025, 06:46 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: MAGAs quoting Maxwell as a reliable source, now?

Was she not charged with perjury in connection with her 2016 depositions?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(08-23-2025, 04:18 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Was she not charged with perjury in connection with her 2016 depositions?

That only mattered before it was known if she would play ball.

Since this latest performance, she has been moved to a nicer prison. If people believe her story, maybe she gets some time off for her good behaviour.
(08-23-2025, 06:53 AM)IDELB2006 Wrote: That only mattered before it was known if she would play ball.

Since this latest performance, she has been moved to a nicer prison. If people believe her story, maybe she gets some time off for her good behaviour.

That's not a prison, it's a gated all-inclusive holiday camp with reception. 

And point of fact, holding her there violates all sorts of established rules and regulations.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."