12 |
1,005 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-26-2025, 10:01 AM)RazorV66 Wrote: You wouldn't know the truth if it slapped you in the face.
The truth doesn’t hurt me, I tell the truth every day. You tell your own truth. Fact is just a phrase we use to justify our own actions and beliefs.
"I hate to break this to ya, but if you always took 86ing as terminate then you didn't pay attention in AIT.
Remove does not at all mean kill bro. To kill creates a entire situation on it own and is just simply not a very cool thing to do."
Me
176 |
2,961 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
MOD. NOTE
COFFEE BREAK IS OVER
BACK ON TOPIC
PLEASE
Do not reply to this post.
61 |
10,443 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

New information:
"Prosecutors' memo to new US attorney found no probable cause to charge James Comey: Sources
Lindsey Halligan nevertheless plans to ask a grand jury to indict, sources say."
""They're going to make a determination. I'm not making that determination. I think I'd be allowed to get involved if I want, but I don't really choose to do so," Trump told reporters in the White House Thursday, just days after imploring the Justice Department to act."
Prosecutors' memo to new US attorney found no probable cause to charge James Comey: Sources - ABC News
----
What? Trump says he does not choose to become involved? This is becoming laughable.
"The only journey is the one within."
18 |
5,826 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-26-2025, 10:18 AM)quintessentone Wrote: New information:
"Prosecutors' memo to new US attorney found no probable cause to charge James Comey: Sources
Lindsey Halligan nevertheless plans to ask a grand jury to indict, sources say."
""They're going to make a determination. I'm not making that determination. I think I'd be allowed to get involved if I want, but I don't really choose to do so," Trump told reporters in the White House Thursday, just days after imploring the Justice Department to act."
Prosecutors' memo to new US attorney found no probable cause to charge James Comey: Sources - ABC News
----
What? Trump says he does not choose to become involved? This is becoming laughable.
From your source:
"A former insurance lawyer turned White House aide with no prosecutorial experience, Halligan has been advised by career prosecutors in the U.S. attorney's office that seeking the charges would violate DOJ policy, raise serious ethical issues, and risk being rejected by the grand jury, sources said. She plans to pursue an indictment anyway, carrying out the clear mandate she received when she was installed into the position over the weekend, sources said. "
Would be laughable if it were not disturbing.
She apparently has no experience of prosecuting.
Just another Yes Person.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
207 |
5,410 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
Comey is as dirty as they come. He's as scummy as Adam Schiff.
But the thing that gets me ... he tried to blame his wife for the whole '86/47' thing he pulled.
Wimp of a guy ... hiding behind his wife like that.
207 |
5,410 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(09-26-2025, 09:39 AM)RuchardHurt Wrote: Trump is a 34 count felon FYI
Because the democrats engaged in lawfare .... Trump is sleazy and paid off a hooker not to talk about their sexcapades. That's not illegal. But the democrats decided to falsely call it a 'campaign contribution' which is a felony and then convicted him 34 times on that one payoff ... a payoff that really wasn't illegal to begin with.
Trump is a mess, but that lawfare thing against him was political lawfare and shady as hell.
12 |
1,005 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-26-2025, 10:58 AM
This post was last modified: 09-26-2025, 11:00 AM by RichardHurt. 
(09-26-2025, 10:56 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: Because the democrats engaged in lawfare .... Trump is sleazy and paid off a hooker not to talk about their sexcapades. That's not illegal. But the democrats decided to falsely call it a 'campaign contribution' which is a felony and then convicted him 34 times on that one payoff ... a payoff that really wasn't illegal to begin with.
Trump is a mess, but that lawfare thing against him was political lawfare and shady as hell.
I am pretty sure that a jury of peers determined that his ass was found guilty on 34 felony counts.
If I am wrong please inform me.
"I hate to break this to ya, but if you always took 86ing as terminate then you didn't pay attention in AIT.
Remove does not at all mean kill bro. To kill creates a entire situation on it own and is just simply not a very cool thing to do."
Me
207 |
5,410 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(09-26-2025, 10:58 AM)RuchardHurt Wrote: I am pretty sure that a jury of peers determined that his ass was found guilty on 34 felony counts.
If I am wrong please inform me.
Okay ... I"ll correct you ... A democrat jury in a blue city in a blue state found him guilty of paying off a hooker not to talk about his sexcapades with her ... something that is disgusting but isn't illegal. The Democrats falsely called it a 'campaign contribution' which made it illegal ... even though it really wasn't.
"Guilty" 34 times, for one payoff, that wasn't really illegal.
I can't stand the guy, but this is a clear case of lawfare.
12 |
1,005 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

09-26-2025, 11:03 AM
This post was last modified: 09-26-2025, 11:06 AM by RichardHurt. 
(09-26-2025, 11:02 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: Okay ... I"ll correct you ... A democrat jury in a blue city in a blue state found him guilty of paying off a hooker not to talk about his sexcapades with her ... something that is disgusting but isn't illegal. The Democrats falsely called it a 'campaign contribution' which made it illegal ... even though it really wasn't.
"Guilty" 34 times, for one payoff, that wasn't really illegal.
I can't stand the guy, but this is a clear case of lawfare.
Have you ever been in a jury pull?
I'll just end this fast.
You clearly have not because if you had you would understand the dynamics and complexity that goes into preserving our very much cherished republic through the courts.
I do enjoy our often debates.
"I hate to break this to ya, but if you always took 86ing as terminate then you didn't pay attention in AIT.
Remove does not at all mean kill bro. To kill creates a entire situation on it own and is just simply not a very cool thing to do."
Me
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(09-26-2025, 10:26 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: From your source:
"A former insurance lawyer turned White House aide with no prosecutorial experience, Halligan has been advised by career prosecutors in the U.S. attorney's office that seeking the charges would violate DOJ policy, raise serious ethical issues, and risk being rejected by the grand jury, sources said. She plans to pursue an indictment anyway, carrying out the clear mandate she received when she was installed into the position over the weekend, sources said. "
Would be laughable if it were not disturbing.
She apparently has no experience of prosecuting.
Just another Yes Person.
I'm seeing a pattern
|