10-14-2024, 05:31 AM
Yes it's from RT... but there are lessons in there for all of us to see...
The reporter was silent during the whole diatribe, no questions, no reaction... Part of me wants to say this was actually a speech, not an interview.
If I am right about it being a speech, then it is likely that it was written. Which implies something entirely different from extemporaneous commentary.
Each key phrase was carefully engineered to evoke organized crime, "mafia" was the word she used, comments focusing on pedophilia repeated several times, and the attribution of violence to the sexual escapades (but never assault.)
This piece wasn't about the story... it was about shaming the US exclusively. It is a text-book example of what "journalists" of other countries seem frequently to do, especially those dedicated to diminishing the US's reputation. I would quote Greta and declare "How dare you?" if it weren't for the evidence that our "journalists" do it all the time when discussing "antagonist" countries around the world.
This is a product... curated by RT to deliver what their 'sponsor' demands... but it is a valuable tool for explaining why people in other countries "know" of the US... they aren't told of us with unbiased words. (Nor we of them, I expect.)
If this piece represents what "Russians" know of the P-Diddy matter, then they seem to be relying on social media for their content... because what she describes is nothing new with the sole exception of the guest's opinion that the US should take care of its own before judging Russia... overall, fairly tame.
Nothing new there... just more media shenanigans .. this time in Russian.
The reporter was silent during the whole diatribe, no questions, no reaction... Part of me wants to say this was actually a speech, not an interview.
If I am right about it being a speech, then it is likely that it was written. Which implies something entirely different from extemporaneous commentary.
Each key phrase was carefully engineered to evoke organized crime, "mafia" was the word she used, comments focusing on pedophilia repeated several times, and the attribution of violence to the sexual escapades (but never assault.)
This piece wasn't about the story... it was about shaming the US exclusively. It is a text-book example of what "journalists" of other countries seem frequently to do, especially those dedicated to diminishing the US's reputation. I would quote Greta and declare "How dare you?" if it weren't for the evidence that our "journalists" do it all the time when discussing "antagonist" countries around the world.
This is a product... curated by RT to deliver what their 'sponsor' demands... but it is a valuable tool for explaining why people in other countries "know" of the US... they aren't told of us with unbiased words. (Nor we of them, I expect.)
If this piece represents what "Russians" know of the P-Diddy matter, then they seem to be relying on social media for their content... because what she describes is nothing new with the sole exception of the guest's opinion that the US should take care of its own before judging Russia... overall, fairly tame.
Nothing new there... just more media shenanigans .. this time in Russian.
