0 |
7 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Having experienced "remote knowing" and precognition personally, I am absolutely, unequivocally convinced that they exist. They are, however, extremely difficult to prove in a laboratory setting. Just the nature of the beast. In my case, there is a feeling that it is not healthy to delve too deeply into the phenomena as though there lies insanity. It's like biting down on tinfoil, an unpleasant sensation that one just wants to stop.
I have difficulty in separating remote knowing and precognition because if one "knows" that a friend is about to arrive, even with no normal information to suggest such arrival, is that precognition or remote knowledge? I have experienced this phenomena on several occasions, and no, it was not just random. In one instance, I had not seen a friend in months, had no expectations of seeing him for months, but one evening as I was about to go inside, the thought popped into my head "I'll just stay outside and watch Joe arrive", which he did a few minutes later.
The author and filmmaker Michael Crichton wrote extensively about ESP in his two "Travels" books. To paraphrase, he wrote something like "ESP is difficult to study in the laboratory, but so is sexual attraction and response, and no-one is arguing that that doesn't exist".