Is Science Bullshit?

[quintessentone]

What exactly do you mean ?

I mean that the research curriculum of universities continues along scientific theories of the elitist scientists who claim to know which way to explore, when they don't even include the fourth dimension in some of those theories. It is not working and it's all an academic sham without allowing new and exciting theories to break through even when other scientists challenge even the basic understandings of the reality of nature, such a gravitational waves. These elitist scientists will never accept a debate challenge because they know they will fall short.

[sahgwa]

I mean that the research curriculum of universities continues along scientific theories of the elitist scientists who claim to know which way to explore, when they don't even include the fourth dimension in some of those theories. It is not working and it's all an academic sham without allowing new and exciting theories to break through even when other scientists challenge even the basic understandings of the reality of nature, such a gravitational waves. These elitist scientists will never accept a debate challenge because they know they will fall short.

Yes, absolutely . In some way it is the same as a lot of established scientists being afraid to research the paranormal.  Life is very strange , and in their refusal to do real science, and instead practise Scientism, holding on to the dogma instead of the practise, humanity is losing out.

[Oldcarpy2]

When I did my Law degree I had to do a "wild card" course.

I did Pseudoscience.

My tutor witnessed ball lightning rolling down the aisle of a plane.

We did a dowsing experiment. A tray of about twenty covered paper cups, one had water in it.

We used bent coat hangers loosely held between thumb and forefinger.

They crossed over above the one with water.

We did it one at a time on our own.

It was 100% accurate.

[sahgwa]

When I did my Law degree I had to do a "wild card" course.

I did Pseudoscience.

My tutor witnessed ball lightning rolling down the aisle of a plane.

We did a dowsing experiment. A tray of about twenty covered paper cups, one had water in it.

We used bent coat hangers loosely held between thumb and forefinger.

They crossed over above the one with water.

We did it one at a time on our own.

It was 100% accurate.

Exactly; it is heartening there are some academic organisations looking into things like qi/prana, telepathy, precognition, remote viewing, but for a host of reasons it is not being largely accepted in mainstream scientific circles because they are often very close minded and only looking out for their tenure or peer recognition. I think.  Ridicule works for a lot of people, especially materially minded and ego driven individuals like scientists.

[Oldcarpy2]

Like the old joke, where the Prof asked his students:

"Anyone who believes in telekinesis, please raise my hand".

Now, Synchronicity, there's a real spooky thing....

[sahgwa]

I don't know about anyone else but synchronicity this year has been off the charts. 
A book I am reading will mention a topic my friend was talking about the day before, a random article will reference the author of said book and another person will be visiting the author's hometown.
Just random stuff that is crazy correlated in the same week.

[quintessentone]

Yes, absolutely . In some way it is the same as a lot of established scientists being afraid to research the paranormal.  Life is very strange , and in their refusal to do real science, and instead practise Scientism, holding on to the dogma instead of the practise, humanity is losing out.

I could not have explained it better myself. How do we know the paranormal is not another dimension? We will never know.

[quintessentone]

So to answer the OP's question "Is Science Bullshit?"

There is nothing certain in science and even Einstein's Theory of General Relativity may need to be modified as we extend our understanding of the cosmos.

AI:

• Theories are not "proven" in the absolute sense: Scientific theories are supported by evidence, but they are never definitively "proven" because future discoveries could potentially challenge them.
  
• Science strives for the most reliable understanding: While certainty is not the goal, science aims to provide the most accurate and reliable understanding of the world based on available evidence.
  
• Example: The theory of gravity, while highly successful, might be refined or replaced by a more comprehensive theory of gravity that incorporates quantum mechanics.
  

[Creaky]

Yes, absolutely . In some way it is the same as a lot of established scientists being afraid to research the paranormal.  Life is very strange , and in their refusal to do real science, and instead practise Scientism, holding on to the dogma instead of the practise, humanity is losing out.

Yes, absolutely they research the paranormal, not even a little afraid of it, in great detail
Afraid that research is not for your eyes or mine 
Just like little green men, researched and hidden
And that’s just my opinion

[Unknownparadox]

Is literally everyone full of shit these days?



Including 'science'?

Science has two massive problems, along with many others, the way I see it.

The first being math, what I believe to be the backbone of science. While math is very handy, the problem is, any amount of space is infinitely divisible. That massive problem has been over looked since math was discovered or invented.

The second being human bias.

There is so many problems with accepted science it isn't funny. And as someone else said in this thread. We are not smart enough to question it.