09-09-2025, 08:16 AM
❮
❯
|
09-09-2025, 08:25 AM
This post was last modified: 09-09-2025, 08:29 AM by quintessentone. 
(09-09-2025, 02:18 AM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: Next I would like to comment on some of the anecdotal stories provided by several members. Even though I may disagree with other’s opinions, having a dialog is still important. You will find here on DI that you need not second-guess yourself as to your behaviour when simply giving an alternate opinion nor will you need to always be on the defensive here because from my experience this site is on a different trajectory for getting at the truth and not getting at the messenger. From your source, I have referenced other recent sources as well, but here is one that is very interesting. Psychological assessment and counseling remain important features of quality care: A descriptive study of individuals who did not start gender-affirming medical treatment in a gender identity unit in Spain It may be that, starting now and maybe increasing into the future, that people with confusion as to their gender will be properly categorized within now known and newly realized subsets of diagnosis and treatment. Perhaps another answer to addressing psychological issues with GD and/or seemingly related expressions, lies in societal education and understanding of this topic because as we go along here learning from recent studies, the confusion of patients and their families and medical clinicians who relied on now questionable methodology of previous studies, all around, seems to be what is being highlighted now. And that's a good thing - to keep challenging the status quo so as to keep pushing for more expansive medically- and empirically-based evidence vs. evidence-based and perhaps bias-based studies using such low study groups. Perhaps, in the future, everyone can feel comfortable in the skin they were born in. So, thank you AAO, for your efforts in trying to get the facts out there.
"The only journey is the one within."
09-09-2025, 03:54 PM
(09-09-2025, 08:16 AM)ANNEE Wrote: Because this didn’t exist before plastics? You simply aren't going to answer the question. No democrat I have asked has, the reason being, they like it, they want it. Never mind the pain and suffering it is causing. This is going to come as a shock to you. Many things have been around long before plastic. Like cancer.. You're not going to believe this. Oil causes cancer. Who would have thunk it? Birth defects have been around since humans have. You're not going to believe this either. Oil/plastic causes birth defects. It's amazing I can't believe it myself. So this deflection doesn't stand up any better than the last two or three.
09-09-2025, 04:22 PM
(09-09-2025, 08:25 AM)quintessentone Wrote: You will find here on DI that you need not second-guess yourself as to your behaviour when simply giving an alternate opinion nor will you need to always be on the defensive here because from my experience this site is on a different trajectory for getting at the truth and not getting at the messenger. Very well said. Everything you wrote has genuine merit; particularly I liked this part. We cannot judge others by their previous selves, because (some) people evolve and change. Likewise we should not judge DI by ATS behaviors, even though many of those folk are here also. Every event can be looked at as fresh without the baggage of the past. Myself, I try for no judgement at all, ever, even as much as I'm human and completely and explicitly fallible.
"Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always". - Darielys Tejera/Spc. Douglas Jay Green/Robin Williams
"Pseudoscience, depending for its “truth” on consensus, is deeply hostile to challenge." - Rael Jean Isaac
09-09-2025, 05:46 PM
(09-09-2025, 03:54 PM)Unknownparadox Wrote: You simply aren't going to answer the question. No democrat I have asked has, the reason being, they like it, they want it. Never mind the pain and suffering it is causing. Is this a Republican vs Democrat question? I’m neither. I’ve been around “here and previous” for 18 years. I am very familiar of those who reject an answer because they don’t like it.
09-09-2025, 07:44 PM
(09-09-2025, 05:46 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Is this a Republican vs Democrat question? I’m neither. LMAO. It's a simple yes or no question that you refuse to answer. I can only guess why you have offered so many deflections. It doesn't have anything to do with republicans or democrats. Although you are acting like a democrat. Deflection has become standard policy for democrats. And that is all you are doing, is deflecting. It's a simple question, if you could stop the trans dilemma of being born in the wrong body. Which by the way is a very big problem. Since you have the wrong brain in the wrong body, supposedly. So....... for the fourth or fifth time. If you could stop a person from being born in the wrong body with no harm to the yet to be a person, no harm to the yet to be a trans? No abortion, that I am surer you support. You simply remove the thing that is causing them to be born in the wrong supposedly body. Would you do it? And how long you been here or any where else is not relevant. It's just another deflection. And you haven't given a answer. All you have given is deflections. I suspect you never will answer. And it is obvious why.
09-09-2025, 07:46 PM
(09-07-2025, 07:11 PM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: Yay! Another antagonistic thread about trans people. This place is feeling more like ATS every day. Congratulations!And when they turn 18 they can decide on whatever medical procedures they want for their bodies it's okay for them to wait. Being gay didn't require any medical assistance and no one is saying they can't dress how they want minus it being appropriate attire for school. jeez put away your butcher knifes and just let them be kids.
“The American press is a shame and a reproach to a civilized people. When a man is too lazy to work and too cowardly to steal, he becomes an editor and manufactures public opinion.”
― William T. Sherman
09-09-2025, 08:41 PM
I personally do not understand how anyone can not comprehend -- that the physical body changes during teen years.
If you are m/f -- you do not want male physical changes to your body. If you are f/m -- you do not want female physical changes to your body. Hormone blockers prevent the physical changes. It stops the physical changes -- giving teens the few years they need to become legal adults.
09-09-2025, 08:55 PM
(09-09-2025, 08:41 PM)ANNEE Wrote: I personally do not understand how anyone can not comprehend -- that the physical body changes during teen years. Everyone comprehends it, lol. The problem is trans kids are being fed this stuff from the crib to 18. There is no reason to discus gender and sex with a 3-4-5 year old. they have no use for it. And the pro trans groups position is. Children should learn about gender and sex. Teens who aren't legally able to make decisions because the grown up line is 17 or 18, should be able to. So sticking them on mind altering drugs at 10 is suspect. We all understand why you want to put them on mind altering drugs before they hit puberty. Technically the law doesn't allow it. And the pro trans figure they can ignore it. Get the law changed and you won't have any issues. I don't understand why anyone doesn't understand that.
09-09-2025, 09:12 PM
(09-09-2025, 08:55 PM)Unknownparadox Wrote: Everyone comprehends it, lol. The problem is trans kids are being fed this stuff from the crib to 18. Where do you get your information that trans kids are being fed this stuff from crib to 18 (besides on discussion forums). As far as 3/5 year olds — why jump straight to physical sex? Or pedophiles. It’s really bizarre. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|








