(01-10-2026, 05:18 PM)fwki Wrote: The US must take Greenland, whatever the cost
"...Critics insist Greenland’s future is not Washington’s to decide. Formally, they are right. Strategically, however, that statement is comforting nonsense. In a world of rising rivalry, no great power allows vital terrain to drift into adversarial hands out of courtesy. Sovereignty is sacred until security is threatened; then it becomes negotiable. This isn’t cynicism, but the hard ledger of history."
"...Europe benefits enormously from American security guarantees, but recoils whenever Washington acts like a power rather than a charity. There is something faintly comic about NATO allies warning the U.S. against taking its own defense too seriously....European nations insist Greenland is not for sale, while quietly relying on American troops, money and missiles to keep the peace that permits such comfortable posturing. It is a bit like lecturing the fire brigade on property rights while borrowing their hoses. Principles are easier to defend when someone else pays the insurance...."
This opinion piece makes a good case for it, at least far better than Uri Geller.
This is no good case for invading Greenland.
The security excuse Is total BS as you already have a US military Base there, with a treaty saying you can expand it as much as you like.
