62 |
2,165 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 10:48 AM)fwki Wrote: Concentration camps? "Pretty much" must translate as "not at all".
You were the one saying lets offer them a small little piece of land and just take what we want!!
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
6 |
1,378 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 10:47 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Yeah yeah and Obama promised to close Gitmo. Okay?
The point Trump made campaigning was that he didn't want more endless quagmires of indecisive wars and pointless adventurism that doesn't benefit America. At least, that's what landed with his base. More veterans voted for Trump than Democrats. And it really is amusing that it's the Democrats who have the most problems with how Trump has "upheld his promises", suddenly they've discovered rose-coloured glasses they can view politics through, when they can play a disingenuous "lack of truthiness" card for political gain. It's absurd.
The rest of your points are well taken, and Trump would do well to address them.
I was a Ron Paul guy. Obama seemed fake, over promising, and too convenient for me to take seriously. Even if he followed through on his platform, I didn’t really care for it anyways.
I’ve noticed that recently a lot of people have pointed to what previous presidents have done to justify Trump. Yet Trump was supposed to be different than all of them. If he’s just another Obama or Bush, where are we?
The only thing he’s really delivering on is immigration. Everything else is basically a 180. Hell, more people have been pardoned for corruption than charged with it. We’re not going after the deep state, we just changed who’s in charge of it and the agendas they wanted are still going through. Venezuela and Iran were on their wet dream list for decades.
It’s easier now to point out how trump is similar than Bush and Obama than it is to show where he’s different. And one of the biggest differences is he’s just blatant about the same types of actions instead of dancing around it diplomatically. Which, I guess is semi refreshing that the quite parts are said out loud, but that doesn’t do much when we wanted all of that to change anyways.
62 |
2,165 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

01-20-2026, 11:01 AM
This post was last modified: 01-20-2026, 01:29 PM by Kurokage. 
(01-20-2026, 10:54 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: First, no it's not. At least, not from my browser.
Second, here is the source poll that it took exactly 3 seconds to find:
https://patriotpolling.com/our-polls/f/g...ted-states
Third, that poll looks attackable and possibly biased, if only because it's from "Patriot Polling".
Fourth, I bet it's at least as accurate as the polls that say Greenlanders want nothing to do with independence from Denmark.
The poll is laughable and viewable, but thanks for the link, as for GB News it's a pay wall unless you allow all tracking cookies, which I wont.
It's more obvious that the Greenlanders don't want Trump with the marches that've taken place with such a small population.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 10:55 AM)CriticalStinker Wrote: The only thing he’s really delivering on is immigration. Everything else is basically a 180. Hell, more people have been pardoned for corruption than charged with it. We’re not going after the deep state, we just changed who’s in charge of it and the agendas they wanted are still going through. Venezuela and Iran were on their wet dream list for decades.
It’s easier now to point out how trump is similar than Bush and Obama than it is to show where he’s different. And one of the biggest differences is he’s just blatant about the same types of actions instead of dancing around it diplomatically. Which, I guess is semi refreshing that the quite parts are said out loud, but that doesn’t do much when we wanted all of that to change anyways.
Yeah, and even 500K out of 30M is really under-delivering on the illegal alien problem.
Trump's problem is that he's pushing the agenda not to the point of a solution, but only to the point of maximum sustained liberal outrage. He needs to go beyond that, and stop treating organized law-enforcement interference with kid-gloves, stop bowing to corrupt and biased circuit-court judges that go beyond the law, and most of all stop worrying about his image so much.
0 foreign-funded corrupt politicians arrested
0 corrupt judges impeached
0 violent domestic anarchist organizations rounded up
1 fbi that sits on its hands dealing with criminal rings with democrat ties
0 tribunals
Maybe year two of four will be better.
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(01-20-2026, 10:08 AM)Kurokage Wrote: Really??
Really.
Blame the idiot protesters who are breaking the law.
Don't blame ICE for enforcing the law and doing a good job of it.
None of this would be necessary if the morons protesting would stop.
They are protecting criminals and causing the USA to commit suicide
by allowing 30 million illegals to stay and wanting wide open borders.
305 |
6,452 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

As per normal procedures
Quote:
[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/166...normal.jpg]
Armchair Admiral
@ArmchairAdml
·
3h
#USAF United States Air Force / #NORAD North American Aerospace Defense Command Boeing C-17A Globemaster III 1x #AE1178 02-1106 - REACH 314 REACH 314 departed Fairchild AFB and is en route to Pituffik Space Base in Greenland. This is the first visible movement of the USAF to Greenland since the U.S. President's comments, and the NORAD announcement of a "planned" exercise.
@MATA_osint
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
305 |
6,452 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

America has flirted with Greenland forever...
Quote:Mike Netter
@nettermike
People mocking the idea of the U.S. buying Greenland don’t know history.
1867 – Andrew Johnson: explored buying Greenland & Iceland (right after Alaska).
WWII – FDR: U.S. took over Greenland’s defense while Denmark was occupied.
1946 – Truman: offered $100M in gold to buy it.
Cold War – Eisenhower →
Kennedy: nonstop negotiations for bases, radar, missiles.
Post–Cold War – Clinton/Bush/Obama: expanded Arctic security & missile defense.
2019 – Trump: said publicly what presidents discussed privately for 150+ years.
The U.S. didn’t “suddenly” want Greenland. It’s been defending it, negotiating it, and embedding there since the 1800s.
Greenland = Arctic power, shipping lanes, missiles, minerals. Trump didn’t invent it. He said the quiet part out loud.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 12:04 PM)putnam6 Wrote: America has flirted with Greenland forever...
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...07d72.jpeg]
Flirting isn't the issue
Aggressive posturing or all out assault is the problem
Trump's demeanor is giving a "rapey" vibe
96 |
5,825 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 09:45 AM)fwki Wrote: Let's be reasonable. Europe cannot protect a piece of North America.
What is reasonable is to share the defensive responsibility, hence NATO exists.
Silly to wish to do it on your own imho.
After all "Many hands make light labor."
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
6 |
1,378 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(01-20-2026, 12:17 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: Flirting isn't the issue
Aggressive posturing or all out assault is the problem
Trump's demeanor is giving a "rapey" vibe
Not to mention all the gaslighting the admin and discourse has given.
”He’s being hyperbolic”
”He’s just joking”
”Okay, he’s not joking, but it’s just 4d chess for something else”
”Okay, it’s not for something else, it’s about this and I support it”
I remember getting blasted saying Venezuela was about oil and not drugs, until the admin came out plain as day and said it’s about oil.
That’s just a generalization and not aimed at anyone. Happened with people I know in person too. It’s just a constantly evolving narrative to be whatever is needed in the moment. And if you bring that up, they say it happened with the last presidents too, who I didn’t vote for I may add. Trump is the only R or D I’ve voted for (unless you count Paul). It was the first term and I saw quickly he was the Right’s version of Obama. Promise the world and deliver the status quo you won to “change”. Yet be critical of Trump and you are a lib with TDS, as if being libertarian can’t exist because “pick a side”.
Our political system is dead. There is only illusions of changing it while the same things happen over and over. People are willing to believe that at least it’s not the other side while ensuring the other side will be elected right after them so the public thinks they can try and counter or reverse bullshit.
|