DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Gov Internet Shills.
#11
During the Nuremberg trials post WW2, it was declared that the propaganda branch was the worst war crime as it enabled all the other war crimes to take place.
#12
(12-20-2025, 10:50 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Sounds as if TPTB got tired of feeding the GP all thier bullshit, and will use bots and AI to feed the public all TPTB's bullshit.



Yes mate - they're very lazy as well as duplicitous lol.

Apparently bots now account for 51% of all online traffic (72% of which is 'malicious') and actively flood social media with 'identically worded propaganda posts' (link).

Read a while back that the DOD now spends more on domestic PsyOps than on foreign PsyOps (link) so god knows how bad it is these days - or how insane the situation is in other countries like the UK.

Also no bloody wonder the US Gov altered the Smith-Mundt Act back in 2012 so that they could legally 'domestically disseminate propaganda to the public'.

Beer
#13
(12-22-2025, 03:45 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Yes mate - they're very lazy as well as duplicitous lol.

Apparently bots now account for 51% of all online traffic (72% of which is 'malicious') and actively flood social media with 'identically worded propaganda posts' (link).

Read a while back that the DOD now spends more on domestic PsyOps than on foreign PsyOps (link) so god knows how bad it is these days - or how insane the situation is in other countries like the UK.

Also no bloody wonder the US Gov altered the Smith-Mundt Act back in 2012 so that they could legally 'domestically disseminate propaganda to the public'.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]


Be very careful of what you are calling a bot. Over half the internet traffic is just machines talking to each other. Cashregisters, washing machines, refrigerators, etc. Some of the numbers could be including them just for convenient confusion.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#14
It is probably more subtle than direct distraction and contridiction. How many flatearthers have taken attention away from useful research. Then there is all those cat and other animal videos. Taking time away from looking at serious things.

I am wondering how bad the identification laws for porn sites have hurt the distractions of all governments. That is the biggest distraction I can think of. I can't believe they allowed banning free access to porn.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#15
(12-20-2025, 12:40 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: Sounds like an authoritarian’s wet dream.


Sure does mate and I still meet folks these days who scoff at the very idea of taxpayer funded propagandists, sock puppets, web goons and loser shills in active open play on internet forums.

Seems the premeditated subversion is off the charts and not that long ago these individuals would have been prosecuted for seditious activities against the public.




(12-20-2025, 12:40 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: And the plausible deniability is pretty grand here too.


Yes although Britain did get busted a while back am sure it goes on a lot.


Quote:PDF Files:

HOW COVERT AGENTS INFILTRATE THE INTERNET TO MANIPULATE, DECEIVE, AND DESTROY REPUTATIONS

The ART of DECEPTION C. IGCHO. TRAINING FOR A NEW GENERATION OF ONLINE COVERT OPERATIONS.



Turns out some of the most distrusted corporations also get in on the action and a while back Monsanto got busted employing an army of internet trolls to 'silence online dissent ' and literally 'let nothing go' ('no article, no comment, no social media post is to be left unanswered by these third party proxies').

Beer
#16
(12-20-2025, 01:13 PM)Kurokage Wrote: I just don't think the west looked at it in such a huge scale. They lacked the imagination for total mass control till witnessing it by the countries I stated. 


Hi mate, am not suggesting the countries you mentioned (like China) don't engage in these kind of shenanigans but have you explored the actual origin story of the internet?

Not the fluffy PR narrative - I mean reasons behind its birthing by ARPA and all the original Silicon Valley funding mechanisms created by the Pentagon and multiple alphabet agencies.

Vid

Apparently the internet was initially designed by the Pentagon 'to be a weapon of influence, a weapon of surveillance and a weapon of social control' so I don't think they were lacking in any imagination.




• 'Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet' by Yasha Levine.




Quote:Today the counterinsurgency origins of the internet have been obscured. They’ve been lost for the most part. Very few histories even mention it, even in a little bit. But at the time that it was being created in the 1960s, the origins of the internet and the origins of this technology as a tool of surveillance and as a tool of control were very obvious to people back then".

Book

Beer
#17
(12-22-2025, 09:22 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Hi mate, am not suggesting the countries you mentioned (like China) don't engage in these kind of shenanigans but have you explored the actual origin story of the internet?

Not the fluffy PR narrative - I mean reasons behind its birthing by ARPA and all the original Silicon Valley funding mechanisms created by the Pentagon and multiple alphabet agencies.

Yeah, I get that after the creation of the 'spy network' and the following birth of the World Wide Web, many nefarious people looked at it whilst rubbing their hands across the globe, but China took control to whole new level with it's digital 'grading' of it's people.

Thanks for the interesting links.  Thumbup



 
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning." 
Charles Tremper
#18
(12-20-2025, 10:50 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Sounds as if TPTB got tired of feeding the GP all thier bullshit, and will use bots and AI to feed the public all TPTB's bullshit.



Think it’s more like the public don’t trust the msm anymore so corrupt the internet
#19
(12-22-2025, 03:45 AM)Karl12 Wrote: Yes mate - they're very lazy as well as duplicitous lol.

Apparently bots now account for 51% of all online traffic (72% of which is 'malicious') and actively flood social media with 'identically worded propaganda posts' (link).

Read a while back that the DOD now spends more on domestic PsyOps than on foreign PsyOps (link) so god knows how bad it is these days - or how insane the situation is in other countries like the UK.

Also no bloody wonder the US Gov altered the Smith-Mundt Act back in 2012 so that they could legally 'domestically disseminate propaganda to the public'.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]

Yeah, that was the beginning of the end. ATS was all over it at the time, IIRC, today's eventualities were predicted as well 

and one huge reason Barack Obama's Presidency was so disastrous for America.

Now, nothing can be taken at face value anymore; it has to be vetted, disseminated, and discussed; I trust nothing from our government or media. 

Highly recommend the  

https://ground.news/blindspot
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is 
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart 
 
[Image: PEART-2744335652.gif]

 
#20
(12-20-2025, 11:17 AM)BeTheGoddess Wrote: Welcome to DIRPG; please choose a class:
  • Government Shill
  • Bot
  • Cryptid
  • Antifa
  • Alien
  • Weather Balloon.

I suppose Alien will have to do. 
nanu nanu


A bot pretending it's an alien?
oh noo

This all ties into the fact that reality is merely consciousness experiencing itself via  a set of agreements with other trained consciousnesses. 
Let's all change the rules.