11-09-2024, 03:01 PM
This post was last modified 11-09-2024, 06:18 PM by IdeomotorPrisoner. 
(11-09-2024, 12:00 PM)pianopraze Wrote: Let’s look at this devil.
not providing aid after emergency is 1 step from not providing aid in an emergency
not providing aid in an emergency is one step from rounding up groups of people.
2 steps to auschwitz
There is no excuse for this person.
There is no excuse for corporate climate they felt safe texting this order to group.
It shows deep, ingrained, systematic corruption.
Hiding individual in the corporation is not enough.
They need to be publicly punished through legal system to de-incentivize this ingrained corporate culture or nothing changes.
I think there's a context thing here missing..
If the homes were intact enough to still have Trump campaign stuff in their yards, then damage in that area was minimal. Or they felt it necessary to them put back up.
I looked up "Milton Damage Lake Placid Florida" and all I got was a solar power plant suffering damage from a tornado. Winds otherwise topped out at 73 MPH. 97% in the county left without power in direct aftermath.
I don't know enough about the particulars to make a full judgement yet. Were they without electricity/gas/clean running water? Was that restored quickly? I could find Duke Energy's power restoration time table to no concrete data for how fast it was actually restored.
Apart from the spawned tornado damage, they experience severe thunderstorms more powerful damage-wise.
Like everything was so hostile they didn't want to interact with the politically charged. Maybe there were confrontational incidents reported leading to this guys directive.
Like how after LibsofTikTok influenced people to think Target sold transgender swimwear for kids, people got so riled up and angry they abused teenage target employees, even threatening them over it.
Maybe there were reports of Trump supporters taking out racheted up anger over Biden/FEMA on aid workers, which caused a very callous directive to avoid conflict by avoiding Trump supporting properties altogether.
Maybe it was partly "earned," or there was a retaliatory reason to say "Fuck 'em," as it appears they did.
I do not endorse withholding aid based on political ideology. They're health workers, not a political judicial council, so try a hippocratic approach.
Just trying to find a rationale other than being politically ignored by a democrat bias federal agency (or employees) that want to be a bunch of dicks.