28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

This is yet more proof to my intuition that NATO is not only a 'too big to fail' corrupt monster, as bad or worse than the Evil Soviet-Wannabe Empire Russia (to paraphrase other posters), but that they have no reason to pursue peace with their money making and they have CAPTURED 'democratic' processes in the whole European Continent.
Dutch Government Admits It is Obligated to Follow a Secret NATO Agenda
https://deanderekrant.nl/kabinet-erkent-...s-de-baas/
The cabinet has recognized that it implements policy based on NATO objectives that are secret. The objectives are related to making society resilient to disruptive events such as war, pandemics and natural disasters ‘. Member of Parliament Pepijn van Houwelingen of Forum for Democracy speaks of “a huge black hole in our democracy ”.
The Schoof cabinet says it wants to make the Netherlands ‘resilient ’, so that the population is well prepared for crisis situations such as sabotage of the drinking water supply, the elimination of electricity and communication networks and biological warfare. The Other Newspaper reported last year that the resilience of The Hague comes from NATO. Former Prime Minister Mark Rutte and other heads of government of NATO member states signed in 2023 at a NATO summit in the Lithuanian capital Vilnius for the implementation of so-called ‘resilience objectives ’ (resilience targets). They promised to take action against these goals.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/bom...irect=true
They , like all freaky 'elites' hide behind fuzzy warm sounding (to idiots) goals like resiliency, diversity, equity, democracy while blatantly pursuing total economic and social control 'for your own good'
57 |
10,146 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

So they are doing what every other world government is doing, not giving up all their strategic plans so enemies can gain an upper hand. I think it's named 'classified' security information.
What do you think this means?
"The objectives are related to making society resilient to disruptive events such as war, pandemics and natural disasters."
"The only journey is the one within."
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 09:30 AM)quintessentone Wrote: So they are doing what every other world government is doing, not giving up all their strategic plans so enemies can gain an upper hand. I think it's named 'classified' security information.
What do you think this means?
"The objectives are related to making society resilient to disruptive events such as war, pandemics and natural disasters."
If you translate the newspeak it means 'our objectives are related to fomenting war, experimenting with viruses, and profiting off of these and natural disasters, by holding your governments in thrall'
57 |
10,146 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 09:41 AM)sahgwa Wrote: If you translate the newspeak it means 'our objectives are related to fomenting war, experimenting with viruses, and profiting off of these and natural disasters, by holding your governments in thrall'
Perception is everything, they say.
"The only journey is the one within."
17 |
5,394 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 09:41 AM)sahgwa Wrote: If you translate the newspeak it means 'our objectives are related to fomenting war, experimenting with viruses, and profiting off of these and natural disasters, by holding your governments in thrall'
Only if your translator is broken or is rabidly anti NATO.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

06-16-2025, 10:49 AM
This post was last modified: 06-16-2025, 10:50 AM by sahgwa. 
(06-16-2025, 10:42 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Only if your translator is broken or is rabidly anti NATO.
NATO helped raised me and provide some education, so no, not rabidly anti NATO.
Just very open minded.
You have to look behind the facades.
No one should be rabid about anything, but we should be willing to admit to ourselves when our power structures are no longer serving our best interests, no?
Just like these Dutch government officials, who have benefited from NATO in the past, are willing to admit to themselves and their constituents. If only we could all be so brave.
The Dutch have a history of being very forefront, and open minded in regards to matters of politics and the spirit.
I should know, as thanks the MIC , I was raised in the Netherlands. . .
17 |
5,394 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Sahgwa wrote:
"NATO helped raised me and provide some education, so no, not rabidly anti NATO."
Your posting history might tend to suggest otherwise?
What's wrong with promoting resilience to natural disasters and suchlike? If they were doing the opposite I might be more concerned.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
0 |
8 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 09:41 AM)sahgwa Wrote: If you translate the newspeak it means 'our objectives are related to fomenting war, experimenting with viruses, and profiting off of these and natural disasters, by holding your governments in thrall'
That's not translating. That making up a story.
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 10:55 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Sahgwa wrote:
"NATO helped raised me and provide some education, so no, not rabidly anti NATO."
Your posting history might tend to suggest otherwise?
What's wrong with promoting resilience to natural disasters and suchlike? If they were doing the opposite I might be more concerned.
Like I said in the Bilderburg thread, the 'elite' power structures have a habit of speaking in fluffy progressive friendly helpful terms, but not acting as such. The proof is in the pudding.
If it weren't so, we would have had peace in Ukraine and Gaza by now, not to mention no usurping of private rights of farmers in the Netherlands, Belgium , Portugal, etc etc
28 |
2,671 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2025, 11:08 AM)ziplock9000 Wrote: That's not translating. That making up a story.
To bring it around to the topic of the Dutch Government, you think it is okay for a non legislative body like NATO to dictate policy to a government, and use classification and secrecy with 'regional security' as an excuse, to not share their goals to said government, and thus to stifle the government from doing their job of ruling their populations in the way that the population wants and is accountable for?
|