116 |
1,312 |
JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
10,482 |

Document 06 reminded about this 4chan post https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/...r_epstein/
There is a grim reality where sadness spurs creativity.
22 |
226 |
JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
2,260 |

The dude wants to bang his own daughter. Not surprising
1 |
157 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
875 |

02-09-2025, 01:43 PM
This post was last modified 02-09-2025, 01:43 PM by chr0naut. Edited 1 time in total. 
(02-08-2025, 03:34 PM)guyfriday Wrote: A few things that bother me about this:
1 if there was any validity to this court filing, then why didn't it come back up when the Democrats wanted Trump to drop out of the election. Hell, I mean they tried to kill him at least twice.
2 Given that Epstein's name was being dropped, the question of brainwashing has to be in order here. Either the girl wasn't raped, or she was raped by someone that Jeff called Trump. Remember that one guy in Florida that legally had his name changed to Donald Trump.
3 lastly, this case was about back in 2016 when the Trotskyists were all about paying women to come forward with false rape allegations against Trump. How are we supposed to know if this was real or not given how they (the Trotskyists) muddied the waters on this topic.
I think that the evidence of this event ever happening with the now President Donald Trump will never come about, but I do wonder if that guy that changed his name to Donald Trump might have been a serial rapist that was being in Florida. Either way, without any development on this case it's going to be very hard to figure out where truth begins and propaganda ends.
The initial accusation was against both Trump and Epstein.
The alleged rapes occurred in the summer of 1994, when Trump and Epstein partied together, before they dissociated from each other in 2004 over conflict about the purchase of an ocean-front property in Palm Beach (Maison de l’Amitie).
The plaintiff allegedly told another witness in 1995-1996, a classmate at the time, about the rapes. An affidavit to that was retained in evidence and marked as Exhibit B.
The plaintiff alleges that she was enticed to attend the 'parties' by being offered modelling roles, despite the fact that she was significantly underage, however, the Trump organization has had several accusations of offering modelling work to minors. There is a history of Trump personally using his pageants for his own gratification, and of alleged human trafficking of minors.
Ex-contestant: Trump inspected each woman before pageant
A Timeline of Donald Trump’s Creepiness While He Owned Miss Universe
Donald Trump and the Sex Industry
(*note .pdf format)
Jeffrey Epstein introduced me to Trump at 14, Ghislaine Maxwell accuser says
Trump’s Business Partners Allegedly Involved In Human Trafficking, Mafia Matters, Probable Money Laundering
How Jeffrey Epstein Is Linked to Fashion, Media and President Trump
It is clear that most of this happened before Trump ran for President, and that all recent denials by Trump supporters, and also the allegations that it is all a political witch-hunt are just plainly untrue. Political damage control of a deeply compromised front-man.
193 |
1,324 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
18,615 |

(02-08-2025, 12:30 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: What don't you get?
The guy is into trashy full grown women.
That's his type.
He's not ever been into kids that we can see.
That makes me doubt the truthfulness of a story about him going after a 13 year old kid.
He doesn't come across as a pedo.
He does come across as a masher.
1 |
62 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
414 |

(02-08-2025, 03:34 PM)guyfriday Wrote: 1 if there was any validity to this court filing, then why didn't it come back up when the Democrats wanted Trump to drop out of the election. Hell, I mean they tried to kill him at least twice.
If Trump did commit this crime - I'm not saying he did or didn't - then there's an obvious reason why The Democrats didn't use it against him; because there's an awful lot of nonces in their party too.
Someone goes after Trump over this then Trump and The Republicans would retaliate in kind.
There's probably enough dirt hidden away about politicians off all political persuasions and nationalities to truly bring down the whole amoral, corrupt House of Cards.
I believe in this and its been tested by research, he who fucks nuns will later join the church.
80 |
1,276 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
9,562 |

02-11-2025, 05:47 AM
This post was last modified 02-11-2025, 05:51 AM by Encia22. Edited 1 time in total. 
(02-11-2025, 05:20 AM)Freeborn Wrote: If Trump did commit this crime - I'm not saying he did or didn't - then there's an obvious reason why The Democrats didn't use it against him; because there's an awful lot of nonces in their party too.
Someone goes after Trump over this then Trump and The Republicans would retaliate in kind.
There's probably enough dirt hidden away about politicians off all political persuasions and nationalities to truly bring down the whole amoral, corrupt House of Cards.
Yeah, I think you're right about that, Freeborn.
It's a subject matter that’s a common consecrated ground that neither side dare violate; like in the John Wick movies and The Continental Hotel rules “that function as neutral territories for members of the criminal underworld.”
:beer:
137 |
1,779 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
17,465 |

02-11-2025, 05:25 PM
This post was last modified 02-11-2025, 05:42 PM by putnam6. Edited 1 time in total. 
(02-08-2025, 09:02 PM)guyfriday Wrote: I think that they too often over play their hand by vilifying whomever they go after. If the media just reported the raw news and allowed the public to decide on their own, then in most cases the public would go along with the facts and the media would need to worry about public opinion. It's really a shame that most outlets will propagandize the news rather than just report the facts.
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16
Filed one month before the election, what a fortuitous coincidence.
I have believed for a long time that the left should have played it cool and sooner or later Trump would have done something ridiculous, sleazy, or stupid and the GP would have tired of him instead they made him into a martyr from the "fight him in the streets" and impeachments to try and chop his administration legs off from day one.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
1 |
157 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
875 |

(02-11-2025, 05:25 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16
Filed one month before the election, what a fortuitous coincidence.
I have believed for a long time that the left should have played it cool and sooner or later Trump would have done something ridiculous, sleazy, or stupid and the GP would have tired of him instead they made him into a martyr from the "fight him in the streets" and impeachments to try and chop his administration legs off from day one.
Trump slung lots of dirt against his opponents and previous administrations. Stuff that also when it did go to court, was found to be frivolous and untrue. He should be given the same distrust that he spread about others.
I don't care how popular the perpetrator, if they are guilty, then, in a just and fair society, they MUST bear the consequences.
Regardless of the time-frame, if there is the slightest iota of truth in the allegation this should be investigated, tried and prosecuted, or he should be unequivocally cleared. As it stands, there has been no such completed court case, so the accusation is still relevant.
137 |
1,779 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
17,465 |

(02-11-2025, 06:00 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Trump slung lots of dirt against his opponents and previous administrations. Stuff that also when it did go to court, was found to be frivolous and untrue. He should be given the same distrust that he spread about others.
I don't care how popular the perpetrator, if they are guilty, then, in a just and fair society, they MUST bear the consequences.
Regardless of the time-frame, if there is the slightest iota of truth in the allegation this should be investigated, tried and prosecuted, or he should be unequivocally cleared. As it stands, there has been no such completed court case, so the accusation is still relevant.
So now every dropped case needs to be investigated? OK, How about cases settled out of court?
Imagine if we did that to every politician and business person just in New York or Arkansas or Delaware or California
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
1 |
157 |
JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
POINTS: |
875 |

02-11-2025, 06:45 PM
This post was last modified 02-11-2025, 06:50 PM by chr0naut. Edited 1 time in total. 
(02-11-2025, 06:40 PM)putnam6 Wrote: So now every dropped case needs to be investigated? OK, How about cases settled out of court?
Imagine if we did that to every politician and business person just in New York or Arkansas or Delaware or California
[Image: https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-pu...height=726]
[Image: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/...ipo=images]
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...40-752.jpg]
Perhaps not following up petty crime, but for paedophilia & etc, definitely.
Not a single one should slip through the net.
Amirite?
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for the good to do nothing."
|