Disclosure has begun

[quintessentone]

And what exactly are these sensor/radar glitches they keep mentioning?

----

"Sensor and radar glitches in UAP reports typically manifest as phantom blips, electronic filtering errors, and Doppler spoofing artifacts.  These anomalies are often indistinguishable from genuine objects without rigorous cross-correlation of multiple sensor types. 

• Phantom Radar Returns: Objects appearing on radar that vanish when visual or infrared confirmation is attempted, such as the 2014 Virginia Beach incidents where F/A-18 pilots detected targets that disappeared from visual sightlines despite radar tracking. 
  
• Electronic Filtering Artifacts: Modern radar systems electronically enhance data, which can create false targets or obscure real signals due to software bugs or incorrect logic assumptions about enemy equipment. 
  
• Doppler Spoofing: Adversary electronic warfare techniques that record and replay radar pulses with delays or shifted frequencies, making targets appear to move at different velocities or distances than they actually are. 
  
• Multi-Spectral Discrepancies: Cases where visual observers see an object but radar systems detect nothing, or vice versa, such as the 2004 Nimitz encounter where infrared sensors tracked a Tic-Tac object while visual pilots confirmed its presence, contrasting with cases where only radar detected anomalies. 
  
• Sensor Jamming and Interference: Reports of targeting radars being "jammed" or shutting down when attempting to "paint" a UAP, suggesting either active electronic countermeasures or sensor malfunction due to unusual electromagnetic signatures. " (LLM)
  

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lxvCPJQLvHE

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ntgo7_QatU0

Parallax and IR bloom:




"IR bloom refers to the visual artifact in infrared imaging where a high-intensity source of radiation causes excess charge to spill over into adjacent pixels, making the bright object appear larger and blurrier than it actually is.  This phenomenon is primarily driven by optical effects such as stray radiation, diffraction, and lens scatter, which dominate over minor electronic carrier diffusion in focal-plane arrays." (LLM)

"The parallax effect is a visual technique where background elements move at a different speed than foreground elements, creating an illusion of three-dimensional depth in a two-dimensional space.  This optical illusion mimics real-world perception, where nearby objects appear to move faster than distant ones when the observer changes position. " (LLM)

[bastion]

Do you have any money. How about we meet offline and place a bet as I can show you the paperwork. I can also show you the Federal Court Order signed by Judge Richard Arcara prohibiting any and all discussion of said Investigation to any public media source both foreign and domestic as NCIS dropped The National Security of the USA Card on me just before I appeared on CNN.  So, how much do you want to bet? $10,000, $50,000 or $100,000 vailidated in a public venue by an agreed upon 3rd party. 

You can also invite Satan .

Not sure how things work in the US but I would edit your post if possible as it may include personally identifying information and enough information to violate the federal court order (if things work anything like in the UK) - My Uncle was a confidential source/intelligence asset in the UK and falsely imprisoned for years as it was illegal for him to mention the fact until a judge refused extradition to the US (who he also worked for) and exhonorated him as innocent by naming all the people involved. 

It can be seen as harmful to national security or aiding and abetting the enemy to provide details on such subjects unless a judge or intel/gov agency has formally cleared you to do so. Online/forums are often included in public media umbrella and punishment for the individual/their family can come decades afters such conditions are meant to have ended.

[HAZZARD]

Link

This is nothing to you? Yes, the grainy footage of things maybe already leaked are one thing but for the US to officially say there are anomalies to me is pretty significant. 


Then are few more years later this? 

What are these things?

Project Blue Book released a lot of things and it was silenced. I remember as a kid finding a copy in an old book store written in the 6's. This was before internet hysteria and the ability to create a cover up for a cover up.

It is significant in the sense that the military is acknowledging some incidents remain unidentified or anomalous based on the available data. But that is still a very different claim from confirming non human intelligence.
 
“Anomaly” simply means something not currently explained within the limits of the data, not proof of alien technology.

People often skip over that distinction and treat uncertainty itself as confirmation.

[Encounter]

Thanks for these!
DOW-UAP-PR055, CENTCOM, 2020 also has instantaneous acceleration moment.
I keep watching. First batch was so so made of videos we have seen already. This one is new.

CETCOM 2021 the craft has landed.

I wanted to detail what I found into my almost 50 minutes into the video from SomeStupidName in post #165.

Instantaneous acceleration is in this video compilation from 37.50 to 37.55 minute.

Another one...The craft is taking off can be seen from 43,40 to 43,50 at 5o'clock white disk. At 47.00 it appears again. At 47,50 to 48,00 it makes a landing.

[ArMaP]

Instantaneous acceleration is in this video compilation from 37.50 to 37.55 minute.

I looked at one, but the problem with video like this is that there isn't any reference, so we don't know who was responsible for the sudden change, the object, the camera or both.

[HAZZARD]

I looked at one, but the problem with video like this is that there isn't any reference, so we don't know who was responsible for the sudden change, the object, the camera or both.

That is exactly the problem with videos like this.

Without proper reference points, camera data, context, or multiple angles, you cannot tell whether the apparent motion comes from the object itself, camera movement, zoom, autofocus, rolling shutter, perspective effects, or a combination of them.

People often jump straight to “the object moved impossibly fast” when in reality the video alone does not isolate what is actually changing in the scene.

[Trelane]

Incomplete data and indiscernable items that do not match corresponding anecdotal evidence is what causes much of this topic to fall apart like wet toilet paper. The whole 'phenomenon" has had this problem for decades. One only needs to look as far back as the report by the AARO and the almost categorical dismissal by the pro-extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) crowd as part of the problem. 

There you had a legitimate scientific body actually committed to researching and providing findings. When those items were published, the pro-ETH crowds then poo-poo'ed the results calling the organization a sham and another Blue Book committed to some sort of wide ranging conspiracy.

Too many people make that illogical jump to conclusion that if it's unidentified or unable to be identified due to lack of data, then it must be extraterrestrial.

[Encounter]

I looked at one, but the problem with video like this is that there isn't any reference, so we don't know who was responsible for the sudden change, the object, the camera or both.

Sure. I simply noting some interesting moments in these videos that no one mentioned so far...that's all. It is for entertainment purpose only)

[Toad of Toad Hall]

I’m starting to think that Speilberg’s “Disclosure Day” movie is slotting into “Disney’s Frozen” category, something done to manipulate search results (famously Disney’s Frozen was called that in order to bump “Walt Disney’s frozen head” off the first page of search results). Now when people sewrch “disclosure” or “disclosure day” get get sites about the film, not anything else.

[quintessentone]

I’m starting to think that Speilberg’s “Disclosure Day” movie is slotting into “Disney’s Frozen” category, something done to manipulate search results (famously Disney’s Frozen was called that in order to bump “Walt Disney’s frozen head” off the first page of search results). Now when people sewrch “disclosure” or “disclosure day” get get sites about the film, not anything else.

I'm watching what George Knapp and Lou Elizondo etc. have to say about this whole government disclosure without context thingie.