3 |
289 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-19-2026, 09:14 AM)quintessentone Wrote: Here are the seafloor mapping data:
"While a 2020 U.S. Naval Institute proceedings article cited that only 10 percent of the seafloor has been "adequately mapped," more recent data from the Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project indicates that approximately 24.9% to 26.1% of the global ocean floor has been mapped to modern standards as of late 2023 and 2024. The discrepancy arises because "adequate" mapping requires high-resolution direct observations using multibeam sonar, whereas earlier or lower-resolution estimates often relied on satellite-derived gravity models or sparse soundings.
Key distinctions in mapping coverage include:- High-Resolution Mapping: Less than 0.05% of the ocean floor has been mapped at the highest detail level (features just a few meters in size), an area roughly equivalent to the size of Tasmania.
- Adequate vs. Coarse Data: Approximately 75% of the mapped area relies on estimated depths from satellite gravity measurements, which provide only coarse resolutions and may miss significant underwater features like ridges and canyons.
- Regional Variance: Mapping is uneven, with the North Atlantic and North Pacific having the highest proportional coverage (over 30-40%), while the Indian Ocean remains the least mapped at roughly 17.5%.
- Depth Zones: The hadal zone (depths greater than 6,000 meters) has a high proportional coverage of 55.6%, whereas the shallow zones (0–200 meters) and abyssal zones (3,000–6,000 meters) have lower coverage rates of around 25%.
The Seabed 2030 initiative aims to reach 100% coverage by the year 2030, but current annual progress rates suggest this target may be challenging to meet without significant increases in autonomous vehicle usage and international data sharing. " (LLM)
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedin...n-seafloor
Thanks for the info and link. That's pretty interesting Q. Maybe as they get a little more scanned in TPTB decided that they gonna go go with hints of disclosure as is happening right now. I'll have a good check out your info this afternoon, btw if I'm a bit slow on emails and short replies I work in a engineering factory and operating machinery occasionally able to grab some ATS thingys to keep me sane, hence the above.
0 |
1,817 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Anyone watch Jesse Watters last night?
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6395997145112
This sounds like disclosure. Also interesting that National Geographic reissued "ARE WE ALONE?"
This looks like coordination.
181 |
1,323 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

FROM TODAYS RELEASES:
These are pretty good.
First has some very rapid acceleration.
Second is a Classic Saucer shape jumping through the clouds.
17 |
1,461 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

I think I have seen the first video before.
20 |
1,418 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

05-23-2026, 05:51 PM
This post was last modified: 05-23-2026, 05:52 PM by SomeStupidName. 
This one from CBS has 3 hours of footage.
Quote:The Defense Department released a second batch of UFO files on Friday, two weeks after its first drop. These are all of the videos included in the latest tranche.
0:10 DOW-UAP-PR050, CENTCOM, 2022
0:20 DOW-UAP-PR051, CENTCOM, 2021
5:22 DOW-UAP-PR052, UNKNOWN, 2024
13:37 DOW-UAP-PR053, CENTCOM, 2022
13:59 DOW-UAP-PR054, EUCOM, 2022
17:57 DOW-UAP-PR055, CENTCOM, 2020
18:44 DOW-UAP-PR056, UNKNOWN, 2024
22:16 DOW-UAP-PR057A, YELLOW SEA, 2023
23:27 DOW-UAP-PR058, INDOPACOM, 2024
34:15 DOW-UAP-PR059, CENTCOM, 2020
39:06 DOW-UAP-PR060, CENTCOM, 2021
43:57 DOW-UAP-PR061, CENTCOM, 2021
48:43 DOW-UAP-PR062, CENTCOM, 2021
53:33 DOW-UAP-PR063, CENTCOM, 2021
58:22 DOW-UAP-PR064, CENTCOM, 2017
58:40 DOW-UAP-PR065, SOUTHEASTERN U.S., 2024
59:19 DOW-UAP-PR066, SOUTHEASTERN U.S., 2024
1:00:08 DOW-UAP-PR067, UNKNOWN, 2022
1:04:58 DOW-UAP-PR068, NORTHCOM, 2023
1:06:01 DOW-UAP-PR069, NORTHCOM, 2022
1:06:31 DOW-UAP-PR070, SOUTHEASTERN U.S., 2023
1:07:01 DOW-UAP-PR071, NORTHCOM, 2023
1:07:48 DOW-UAP-PR072, KAZAKHSTAN, 2022
1:07:57 DOW-UAP-PR073, MIDWESTERN U.S., 2022
1:09:16 DOW-UAP-PR074, CENTCOM, 2022
1:14:01 DOW-UAP-PR075, EAST CHINA SEA, 2021
1:14:25 DOW-UAP-PR076, CENTCOM, 2021
1:19:23 DOW-UAP-PR077, CENTCOM, 2020
1:24:22 DOW-UAP-PR078, CENTCOM, 2020
1:29:20 DOW-UAP-PR079, CENTCOM, 2020
1:33:21 DOW-UAP-PR080, CENTCOM, 2020
1:38:03 DOW-UAP-PR081, AFRICOM, 2020
1:43:02 DOW-UAP-PR082, AFRICOM, 2020
1:47:59 DOW-UAP-PR083, CENTCOM, 2020
1:52:33 DOW-UAP-PR084, CENTCOM, 2020
1:56:47 DOW-UAP-PR085, CENTCOM, 2020
2:01:31 DOW-UAP-PR086, NORTHCOM, 2019
2:02:05 DOW-UAP-PR087, CENTCOM, 2020
2:06:59 DOW-UAP-PR088, CENTCOM, 2020
2:11:58 DOW-UAP-PR089, CENTCOM, 2020
2:16:57 DOW-UAP-PR090, CENTCOM, 2020
2:21:54 DOW-UAP-PR091, CENTCOM, 2020
2:26:43 DOW-UAP-PR092, CENTCOM, 2020
2:31:36 DOW-UAP-PR093, CENTCOM, 2020
2:32:06 DOW-UAP-PR094, CENTCOM, 2020
2:37:06 DOW-UAP-PR095, CENTCOM, 2020
2:41:54 DOW-UAP-PR096, CENTCOM, 2018
2:43:13 DOW-UAP-PR097, CENTCOM, 2019
2:48:13 DOW-UAP-PR098, CENTCOM, 2019
3:05:49 DOW-UAP-PR099, CENTCOM, 2023
“The American press is a shame and a reproach to a civilized people. When a man is too lazy to work and too cowardly to steal, he becomes an editor and manufactures public opinion.”
― William T. Sherman
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-13-2026, 12:27 AM)Astyanax Wrote: Neither ‘USA Federal Confidential Registered Source’ nor ‘DOD Federal Confidential Registered Source’ nor ‘USA Federal Confidential Registered Expert’ nor ‘DOD Federal Confidential Registered Expert’ returns any hits related to UFOs or anything else. These titles do not exist. Google, trying to be helpful, suggests a list of references to expert court witnesses.
Good try, but high-risk. And your credibility is shot all to hell now.
Do you have any money. How about we meet offline and place a bet as I can show you the paperwork. I can also show you the Federal Court Order signed by Judge Richard Arcara prohibiting any and all discussion of said Investigation to any public media source both foreign and domestic as NCIS dropped The National Security of the USA Card on me just before I appeared on CNN. So, how much do you want to bet? $10,000, $50,000 or $100,000 vailidated in a public venue by an agreed upon 3rd party.
You can also invite Satan .
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-12-2026, 11:24 AM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: Deamons were made evil by the Christians in the 12th century. In ancient Greece, they were inspirational spirits of knowledge. Sometimes minor gods or intemederies of Greek gods. They could be good or sometimes bad. Not the evil spirits called up by witches as they have been morphed into being.
In concept, the demon and angel are pretty much the same thing.
I know Wikipedia is a weak source but most references are strongly Christian biast and don't go back far enough. Even the Wikipedia article covers the evil part more than the origin of the word. My original source for the information was lost many computers ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon
"The original Ancient Greek word daimōn (δαίμων) did not carry negative connotations, as it denotes a spirit or divine power.[7] The Greek conception of a daimōn notably appears in the philosophical works of Plato, where it describes the divine inspiration of Socrates. In Christianity, morally ambivalent daimōn were replaced by demons, forces of evil only striving for corruption.[8]"
And the word did not exist when the Hebrew Bible was written. Yet another example of degradation of documents by time and reinterpretations.
https://medium.com/the-bible-and-scholarship/the-hebrew-bible-and-demons-eeb6c07568a9
With language and verious printings changing, reading a document from over a thousand years ago is really messed up. The words don't mean what they did when it was written even though it is the same spelling.
Thanks, I learned something
57 |
626 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

05-24-2026, 12:16 PM
This post was last modified: 05-24-2026, 12:26 PM by Waterglass. 
(05-13-2026, 12:27 AM)Astyanax Wrote: Neither ‘USA Federal Confidential Registered Source’ nor ‘DOD Federal Confidential Registered Source’ nor ‘USA Federal Confidential Registered Expert’ nor ‘DOD Federal Confidential Registered Expert’ returns any hits related to UFOs or anything else. These titles do not exist. Google, trying to be helpful, suggests a list of references to expert court witnesses.
Good try, but high-risk. And your credibility is shot all to hell now.
So my OH my your quite the manipulator of semantics. Here you go. Can you guess how many alpha numeric letters are in my identification?
An Inspector General Registered Confidential Source (or Confidential Human Source) is an individual formally registered by an OIG law enforcement division (such as the FBI or DEA OIG) to provide actionable, credible information on criminal activity, fraud, or agency misconduct.The program generally breaks down into these key elements:
Registration and Vetting: Unlike typical whistleblowers, confidential sources (CS) are officially registered. They are subject to rigorous initial and continuing background suitability reviews to assess risks, criminal history, and reliability.Compensation and Protection: Registered sources often receive financial compensation (rewards or expense coverage) in exchange for ongoing intelligence gathering or undercover assistance in OIG investigations. In return, the OIG takes strict measures to protect their identities and safety during investigations.Whistleblower vs. Confidential Source: If you want to report internal fraud or wrongdoing but remain unknown, you can file a complaint with an OIG. You can choose to be either anonymous (OIG doesn't know your identity) or confidential (OIG knows your identity but legally protects and conceals it from other agencies and the public).Record Exemption: By law, records containing the identities of confidential human sources are routinely exempt from public disclosure and standard Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to prevent retaliation and maintain operational
0 |
10 |
| JOINED: |
May 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

05-24-2026, 03:32 PM
This post was last modified: 05-24-2026, 03:47 PM by Encounter. 
(05-23-2026, 05:51 PM)SomeStupidName Wrote: This one from CBS has 3 hours of footage.
Thanks for these!
DOW-UAP-PR055, CENTCOM, 2020 also has instantaneous acceleration moment.
I keep watching. First batch was so so made of videos we have seen already. This one is new.
CETCOM 2021 the craft has landed.
1 |
275 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

05-25-2026, 05:45 AM
This post was last modified: 05-25-2026, 05:46 AM by Astyanax. 
(05-24-2026, 12:16 PM)Waterglass Wrote: So my OH my your quite the manipulator of semantics. Here you go. Can you guess how many alpha numeric letters are in my identification?
An Inspector General Registered Confidential Source (or Confidential Human Source) is an individual formally registered by an OIG law enforcement division...
But that isn’t what you said you were.
And if you really were what you said you were (or what you are now claiming you are), you wouldn't have to cut and paste from Google AI to explain it to me.
Good luck convincing someone else. You haven’t even got to first base with me.
|