DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Definition of 'woman'.
(03-28-2026, 06:24 PM)quintessentone Wrote: ... neuroscience wins this debate.
Lol   Reality and science win ... yes.  Which means you lose.

Quote:I asked for a count of similar trans bashing threads disguised as something else thus far, because we lost count.

 Lol  Who is 'we'?  You and the voices in your head?  Lol

And again .. my posting history is there for all to see.
There are no 'trans bashing' threads at all ... straight out or supposedly 'disguised'.
You really are pathetic with the insinuations.   Weak.   

Walking talking Dunning-Kruger effect.    Lol
(03-28-2026, 06:33 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: Talk about needing comfort...

Jeez. Cop out much!? 

Its not like I want you to acknowledge it as a rooster!!

Like, if you were a farmer, how would you approach a trans-rooster? Would you send it to avian therapy? Eat it? Call it an abomination rooster? Would you deadname and chastise it for it's hormone therapy until it acknowledged it was born a hen?

Just curious.

Fry it, in bacon grease,

With fries.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(03-28-2026, 06:36 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Fry it, in bacon grease,

With fries.

Lol Lol  That's excellent!  Lol ​​​​​​​ Lol
(03-28-2026, 06:35 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Lol   Reality and science win ... yes.  Which means you lose.


 Lol  Who is 'we'?  You and the voices in your head?  Lol

And again .. my posting history is there for all to see.
There are no 'trans bashing' threads at all ... straight out or supposedly 'disguised'.
You really are pathetic with the insinuations.   Weak.   

Walking talking Dunning-Kruger effect.    Lol

None of your failed Freudian mumbo jumbo works on me. It's sad to see you sink so low.

Neuroscience explains it but cognitive dissonance prevents you and others from progressing into knowing the facts.
"The only journey is the one within."
(03-28-2026, 05:56 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: But the freaking hen starts producing testosterone and looking, acting, and sounding like a rooster after her working left ovary become ineffective, and her right overy becomes an internal testicle and transitions her midway through chicken life into a rooster. 

It seems all nature needs is reversed hormones for ornamental trans-animals.  Where the only thing they can't do is reproduce as their identifiable gender. 

Do those "hens" that act and look like roosters have a mental chicken disorder or did something just swap their hormones and naturally change their body and behavior?

BTW — I find your info on the hen informative and fascinating. 

I was never making fun of the research you’ve provided.
(03-28-2026, 06:41 PM)quintessentone Wrote: None of your failed Freudian mumbo jumbo works on me.

Lol  The Dunning-Kruger effect isn't 'Freudian' (David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999) nor is it 'mumbo jumbo'.   It's a real thing.   And you display it ... endlessly ... 

Quote:It's sad to see you sink so low.
Lol   There is nothing 'low' about the observation.   You constantly spew crap about people here and yet you can't take it when someone makes an educated observation about your behavior .... oh the hypocrisy!

Quote:Neuroscience explains it but cognitive dissonance prevents you and others from progressing into knowing the facts.
 Lol  Big words to impress yourself with  ... misplaced in this situation ... and ego in full swing.


And we go back to the actual topic of this thread - 

Definition of woman - an adult female human being.

Definition of a female - of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.
(03-28-2026, 06:48 PM)ANNEE Wrote: BTW — 

BTW - If a person self identifies as a dog, is that person a dog?
Easy question.  Why do you avoid it?
(03-28-2026, 06:55 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Lol  The Dunning-Kruger effect isn't 'Freudian' (David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999) nor is it 'mumbo jumbo'.   It's a real thing.   And you display it ... endlessly ... 

Lol   There is nothing 'low' about the observation.   You constantly spew crap about people here and yet you can't take it when someone makes an educated observation about your behavior .... oh the hypocrisy!

 Lol  Big words to impress yourself with  ... misplaced in this situation ... and ego in full swing.


And we go back to the actual topic of this thread - 

Definition of woman - an adult female human being.

Definition of a female - of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.


Again, your failed manipulation tactics won't work on me because you don't know me and your emotional knee jerk triggered nonsense statements just make me feel sorry for you.

Back on topic.

I guess then by your accepted definition, women born without ovaries are not women nor female, am I getting your drift?

"Yes, there are women born without ovaries, a rare condition known as ovarian agenesis or primary ovarian failure, as well as women who have had their ovaries surgically removed (oophorectomy). 
  • Congenital absence: Being born without ovaries is extremely rare and distinct from Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, where individuals typically have normal ovaries but lack a uterus and upper vagina. 
  • Surgical absence: Many women live without ovaries due to medical procedures such as oophorectomy, which may be performed to treat conditions like cysts, cancer, or to reduce cancer risk during a hysterectomy" (LLM)
"The only journey is the one within."
(03-28-2026, 07:01 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Again, your failed manipulation tactics won't work on me because you don't know me and your emotional knee jerk triggered nonsense statements
Lol   Telling the truth isn't 'manipulation' ... and what I said didn't 'fail'.  It hit the nail on the head.  

Quote:just make me feel sorry for you.
 Lol  I find the 'stupid' in you amusing.

Quote:I guess then by your accepted definition, women born without ovaries are not women nor female,

XX/XY.   XX determines that they belong to the sex that produces eggs and carries children.  Female.

XY Men with a penis aren't women.
Never have been.
Never will be.
They can pretend to be all they want.
But that doesn't change the fact that they are XY men.
(03-28-2026, 06:36 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Fry it, in bacon grease,

With fries.

So "eat it" it is.

But what are your thoughts on the phenomenon of hens transitioning to roosters when their working ovary dies and their hormones are swapped by their other gonad spontaneously turning into a testicle?

Their chromosomes dont change.

What does "biology" say natural selection is doing there?

What in nature says, "because you can no longer be a hen, now you'll look and act like a rooster." Why did they evolve that trait? 

Your scientific explanation for why that all happens is all I really want from this....
[Image: 107a51d8a80e0f254dc6a5020be80ef3.jpg]



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  5 Iranian Woman Soccer Players Granted Asylum in Australia FlyersFan 26 1,032 03-15-2026, 12:30 PM
Last Post: ArMaP
  Hollywoods Jesus is a Bald Black Queer Woman FlyersFan 12 1,261 02-19-2025, 04:39 PM
Last Post: Maxmars