Definition of 'woman'.

[andy06shake]

Says you.   None of them will address what a woman is.   
None of them will define a woman.   They refuse.  They run away from reality.

Yeah im a person, and with an opinion nonetheless, same as yourself, says me indeed.

How do you know what they will or won't all address if you have not asked them all?

Again, the reality is that people's thoughts on matters tend to vary.

Your pigeonholing for politics Flyers...

And tarring one side of the political aisle with the same brush.

That never ends well imho.

[Maxmars]

Perhaps it's the nature of activism to amplify an extreme point of friction... and turn it into a matter of 'personal identity.'

It was the way "raging feminism" got it's legs.

The same way the "bias' machine makes noise.

In the instance of "Gender identity" as a metric of 'citizenship' became a "toy" for activist media...
it made literally billions...
a lot of noise ... more warped "celebration" virtue signaling...
anything but peace... "Activism" was not intended to be a profitable nuisance, and many are being exploited.

And in some sense, They distanced their ostensible desires from the 'offending world' by cementing the topic as 'inflammatory" and 'to be avoided socially."
Thus damaging the "spirit" of that movement... (which  am presuming was, 'Let us live in peace.')

No matter what institutional, doctrinal, or even 'traditional' foundations are agitated against it...
it remains a matter of personal choice and will to exercise whatever that individual feels...
not society, not social order, not a 'threat to faith,' all of which are "social" and clearly not personal.

In our reality... our person hood is the boundary no one can ever rightfully breach.

I will regret ever having made some person feel awkward for just presenting themselves...
That choice is theirs...

however contrived, it belongs squarely on each person to be who they are,
rather than pretend otherwise, and choosing to live in deceit even of yourself.

So the entire routine of "we've been oppressed as no others" which is the activist pabulum applied to (fill-in-the-blank) social grief almost defeats itself... the more pronounced, the more it elicits the opposite of the supposed goal... acceptance.  Instead of coexisting... the activists must "make noise."

I celebrate that women are no longer bound to an imposed place in the civil order of society... I think the elimination of the 'statistic' as a 'modulus of influence' would be the best cleansing we could ever achieve.

Women know that they are not men.
Men know they are not women.

Seems like a bad test now doesn't it?

The ambivalence exploited by Activist of all types (yes, I'm risking engendering a bias) is to mistake the contention of synchronous symptoms of social ills, and calling them out selectively... as if they were real by itself.

The bias against "transgender women and men (less so)" manifests I think as a lesser echo of stringent homophobic sentiments... allowed more voice since the audience is a tiny fraction of those they often attribute as a "source" of the "problem".

The key point is that  it is 'they themselves' that make it a problem in the first place.

These same groups embracing the "women have a place and it's blah blah blah"... never seem to see the abuses and exact same obtuseness in ... those OTHER biases they actually embrace ... just because.

And man-hating women never seem to tolerate the occulted, off-center question "almost every one of those men was raised by a woman... How is this so?"

[David64]

I said DEMOCRATS.   I didn't say 'lean left'.

That aside, my statement that Democrats don't know is dead on accurate.
They continually refuse to answer the question when asked to define a woman.
And they run away from it when confronted.
Just as was previously posted on this thread about Pennsylvania.
The Democrats wanted March to be 'womens month' and put forward a bill for that.
When the Republicans asked them to define what a woman was ... they withdrew the bill.

Define a woman ... very easy .... 
A woman is an adult female.
A female is a human designed to produce eggs and bear offspring.

Easy.   
But Democrats buck against that reality.
They try to interject 'feelings' into the definition.
But reality shows it doesn't belong.

They know exactly what the definition of a woman is, they're just pandering to the trans community, just like they do to every other special interest group. For a Party who is "all inclusive" they certainly like to separate people into groups and then attach a label.

[ANNEE]

As I’ve said and will continue to say. 

“People are their Heart”

[David64]

As I’ve said and will continue to say. 

“People are their Heart”

Feelz doesn't replace reality. 

Opinion doesn't replace reality.

You can identify as Superman, but the sidewalk is waiting just the same.

It's the inability to face reality that's the problem. If you were born with a penis, no amount of surgery or makeup and dresses is going to change that.

Why is that we have to "follow the science" unless it's to define the word "Woman".

[Thetruth]

If it has a penis it's a man!
if it has a Penis its a man!
if it dingles and it dangles
an it moves at different angles
If it has a Penis its a man!

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

I'm socially liberal.  I like gender diversity and rainbows, so by virtue of wokeness I am compelled to add layers of nuanced social designation and behavioral characteristics beyond just that which facilitates breeding and sometimes inbreeding..

I got annoyed and tried to do a thread on it, but there's an impasse surrounding expanding from the strict biological definition that is just too damn annoying to do anymore. 

it invariably ends up like The Battle of The Delusional Cambridge Feminist vs. The Immortal Charlie Kirk 

And Charlie always wins. So i'm fine not being able to define the difference anymore. 

As I tried to argue with the collage in my failed thread, "Social Designation of Gender" is validated by the average person, that by their own proclamation "can absolute define what a man and woman is," and their  inability to tell offhand which two are "the men that had their dicks cut off."

[ANNEE]

Why is that we have to "follow the science" unless it's to define the word "Woman".

Does science know what causes Left-handedness?  NO

There is lots science doesn’t know the answer to. 

SCIENCE:  Brain scans indicate that sexual orientation is associated with distinct brain structure characteristics, suggesting a biological basis rather than just environmental factors
. Studies show that homosexual individuals often exhibit structural features—such as in the hypothalamus, amygdala, and cortical regions—that share traits with the opposite sex. 

(I use homosexual because there are more studies than transgender)

[FlyersFan]

Again, the reality is that people's thoughts on matters tend to vary.

Again, thoughts don't change reality.
Democrats continue to refuse to define a woman.
They run from it.
Yet the REALITY on this is very simple.

[FlyersFan]

SCIENCE:  Brain scans indicate that sexual orientation...

Irrelevant.   Sexual orientation is different than defining what a woman is.

A woman is an adult human female.
A female is someone who has eggs and the physiology to bear children.
The end.
Who a  person feels is irrelevant to reality.