Covid jabs are called "bioweapons" in court!

[Thoughtful3]

It is very clear to me that you are the paranoid lunatic here!

Stop projecting your madness onto others, and start facing your fear.

The stupidity you see in your own mirror must be scary to you.

I have been wondering that some of the very defensive, fearful communication may be because they are afraid. That being the case they will not be very receptive to any information brought forward that goes counter to the narrative that they have bought into.

Regardless we have to move forward with what they are doing and planning to do.



https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/fda-...d-vaccines

At this point who would take this
X= 10
F= 6
G= 7
Added together [23] They are crazy.


https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/...fg_ire.pdf

About those PCR tests-

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/the-...tive-tests

"If they don't know how many cases there are, how do they know it's a pandemic?"

[Thoughtful3]

I never thought Bill Gates would be featured on the front page of the Wall Street Journal, the article continues on page 11.


https://nypost.com/2026/05/31/us-news/bi...rs-report/
Most we know already. He is set to testify June 10th.

"His team tapped lawyer John Moran, a Republican former Justice Department official to represent Gates. The team successfully pushed the voluntary questioning back a few weeks and secured an agreement to keep his appearance off video."

I guess we will have to see where this goes.

For the first time in years Billy was not invited to the annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting.

"Gates usually hosts a dinner at his home in Washington state tied to the tech giant's annual CEO summit. Weeks before the May event, though, his team received word it would be better not to do it this year."

TerraPower is also doing damage control.

Lets watch his world implode.

[Thoughtful3]

Here's an update on the court proceedings against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and other key people taking place in the Neatherlands.



https://fionarosediamond.substack.com/p/...om-and-the

[Thoughtful3]

https://afribundance.com/2023/11/26/dece...in-africa/

Looks like the flood gates are wide open-


https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breakin...ncer-study


Information about Ivermectin-


https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/ivermectin...-discovery


"Every Journey Has An End."  Reminds of Billy's book "The Road Ahead."


https://x.com/DanScavino/status/20613277...gr%5Etweet

[Thoughtful3]

https://www.pharmexec.com/view/fda-appro...prevention

I guess one doesn't need to take the jab if this is available.

[chr0naut]

95% effective?   Where have you been? Effective at what exactly?

Here's Pfizer's latest assessment of effectiveness, and I don't see 95%. That was the original claim to hoodwink the public into taking a jab that had been developed on a completely new platform.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcement...9-vaccines

I don't know about you but it did not instill any confidence with me that Pfizer tested the booster on only 8 mice. Why bother testing on any or on any one.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/...ves-anyway

There is a good book that covers what was discovered in the Pfizer Papers. A judge forced Pfizer to release the detailed clinical study papers that they wanted to keep confidential for 75 years.

"The Pfizer Papers"- Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity compiled by Naomi Wolf with Amy Kelly.

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) is calculated by comparing the incidence or risk of disease between a vaccinated group and an unvaccinated group. The fundamental formula is to measure the percentage reduction in disease risk among vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people.

The initial efficacy values were calculated on the initial 'alpha' strain of SARS-CoV-2.

Although mutation is a fairly random event, in the time-frame of the approval of the immunizations, COVID-19 was spreading to larger and larger host population sizes and the likelihood of new strains appearing increases with the number of hosts in which it may mutate.

After the initial strain of SARS-CoV-2, it diverged into multiple strains with changes to the spike protein, resulting in less efficacy to the initial formulation of the immunization, and greater infectiousness of the disease.

The recombinant nature of further new strains showed that unlike with the alpha strain, which had almost died out entirely, the new strains were infecting people at exactly the same time, in a mix of strains.

This means that even if the immunization were to be reformulated for greater efficacy against one particular strain, it would still be less effective against the other strains inhabiting each host.

[Shalhevet]

95% effective?   Where have you been? Effective at what exactly?

Here's Pfizer's latest assessment of effectiveness, and I don't see 95%. That was the original claim to hoodwink the public into taking a jab that had been developed on a completely new platform.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcement...9-vaccines

I don't know about you but it did not instill any confidence with me that Pfizer tested the booster on only 8 mice. Why bother testing on any or on any one.

My comment referred to the original 95% efficacy figure from Pfizer's late-stage clinical trial that measured the vaccine's ability to reduce relative risk of symptomatic COVID-19 against the original virus strain. 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

As for the eight mice, since the core vaccine technology hadn't changed, there was no need for new, multi-stage human trials every time the formula is slightly tweaked.

Flu shot boosters and new vaccine formulations are commonly tested on mice and ferrets during early preclinical research/development stages. Pfizer simply followed this model.

[LightAngel]

5 Months to even hear if anything can happen? Dragging their feet as he pushes to disease everyone. Looks like more of the same.   
Any regular citizen would be thrown in jail instantly.

Yes.

However, not every person inside the system is corrupt, but when a system consistently cushions the powerful and tightens around the vulnerable, that's not an accident.

Money buys time.

Money buys protection.

Money buys the kind of invisibility ordinary people never receive.

And still, we are told the law is equal for everyone.   

[Thoughtful3]

Yes.

However, not every person inside the system is corrupt, but when a system consistently cushions the powerful and tightens around the vulnerable, that's not an accident.

Money buys time.

Money buys protection.

Money buys the kind of invisibility ordinary people never receive.

And still, we are told the law is equal for everyone.    [Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/think.gif]

I was worried about this-

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/no-u...d-the-lung

This reminds me of the strange story about the lung tissue sample in the book "The Preminition" by Michael Lewis.

Chapter 6 the Red Phone.
This chapter deals with Joe DeRisi and his lab at the University of California- San Francisco. He had a new tool to identify pathogens. He contacted the CDC offering to assist.

His invention was so significant he won the MacArthur Genius grant.
He begged the CDC for a sample of the virus, which would have come from an American that had died from Covid.

"To Joe's surprise, the CDC shipped the lung in an ordinary FedEx box.  Weekend delivery." Page 136.

"The UCSF package reception was closed on weekends." Joe had to round up help from his lab assistants to locate the FedEx truck..

Once he had the sample he was able to identify it within hours. 
"The CDC was stunned by what the DeRisi lab had done, and how quickly they had done it."

The CDC lab took many weeks.
So now the troubling part is what pathogen did he test- the original Wuhan strain or ?


https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/a...-xcv0ml3jj

DeRisi ended up meeting with the Jasons.

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki...ory_group)

[Thoughtful3]

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) is calculated by comparing the incidence or risk of disease between a vaccinated group and an unvaccinated group. The fundamental formula is to measure the percentage reduction in disease risk among vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people.

The initial efficacy values were calculated on the initial 'alpha' strain of SARS-CoV-2.

Although mutation is a fairly random event, in the time-frame of the approval of the immunizations, COVID-19 was spreading to larger and larger host population sizes and the likelihood of new strains appearing increases with the number of hosts in which it may mutate.

After the initial strain of SARS-CoV-2, it diverged into multiple strains with changes to the spike protein, resulting in less efficacy to the initial formulation of the immunization, and greater infectiousness of the disease.

The recombinant nature of further new strains showed that unlike with the alpha strain, which had almost died out entirely, the new strains were infecting people at exactly the same time, in a mix of strains.

This means that even if the immunization were to be reformulated for greater efficacy against one particular strain, it would still be less effective against the other strains inhabiting each host.

You may find this very interesting. It is dealing with Ebola but could also apply to Covid.


https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/de...0642735596

I looked up the sources he referenced.

https://www.who.int/news/item/14-02-2020...prevention


The vaccine was green lit November 19, 2019.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/ervebo

January 19, 2020 was when the first American tested positive for Covid-19.

The first death was February [28], 2020 in Seattle. This is significant because Bill Gates had funded the Seattle flu study which ended up identifying that Covid was spreading undetected in Seattle.
Now for some weirdness.

Gates decided to fund this through the Brotman Baty Institute. The team created a new diagnostic tool, process and share the results and perform quality checks to make sure all the work was valid. So far good.


In 2018 & 2019 they tested more than 11,000 cases of flu and sequenced more than 2,300 influenza genomes.... #23 Billy's approved number.

By February 2020 a genomics researcher named Lea Starita had developed her own PCR test for Covid and her team began running it in a few hundred samples that they had gathered for the flu study. Page 71.

At the time, only 18 Covid cases had been confirmed through testing in all of West Washington. The team was finding very different results.

Because they were using the patient's samples on Covid and not the flu - "revealing the results of that test test to anyone - even to the patient or, much less to public health officials- was another matter. It would be a violation of the flu study's research protocols."

This when there was a potential health threat emerging.

"Also their Covid test had been approved  for use in research studies, but not in medical settings."

There was no way to get their tests authorized because the CDC had not established any rules for approving Covid tests.

So here we have this group, funded by Bill Gates where they can see the spread and they couldn't tell anyone.

When they finally advised the government they were ordered to shut down. That is weird.

The CDC kept pivoting allowing them to start and then shut them down again and then restart. That is weird.
On June 10, the team took up testing again.
This is from Billy's plandemic manual.

June 10th is when Billy is to testify.

Gates at any point in time could have stepped in and influenced the CDC because after all he was a close friend of Fauci. But he did nothing and watched the spread. He was funding it so he would have know the results. Evil.