1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-base

[andr3w68]

Do you know the ages of the participants in the OPs posted study?

The exact ages of each participant, no.

Enough data to show that at every age range there were elevated rates, yes. 

This graphic is from the before mentioned study.

[Thoughtful3]

We should really be watching the actions of the WHO. They seem to have foreknowledge of certain events.


https://www.who.int/news/item/19-12-2025...ing-course

Pfizer has also taken a keen interest in cancer. A bit too keen.

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/done...y-pipeline


I would be highly suspicious about Pfizer's intent, after all they have a history.

"Pfizer has been found guilty of 107 offences totaling a staggering $11,261,560,400 in penalties.
Defrauding the government 22 times in 25 years."

https://brownstone.org/articles/5-reason...e-rubbish/

The latest booster clinical trial only had 100 participants and took place over 14 days. I guess that is better than the 8 mice they used for the first booster.

[quintessentone]

I'm not sure if this was posted previously, but a reminder may be helpful here in not being misled.

"Did a South Korean study really claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer?No it did not, but social media ‘influencers’ misused its results to spread misinformation far and wide."

"Al Jazeera’s fact-checking agency, Sanad, examined the original study and discovered that the promoters of this misinformation were omitting a key phrase from the excerpts they cited: “epidemiological association without causal relationship”.
 
In scientific terms, an “epidemiological association” indicates a statistical relationship or common pattern between two events, without implying that one causes the other."

Did a South Korean study really claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer? | Health News | Al Jazeera

[Thoughtful3]

Towards the end of Suzanne Humphries speech she speaks about the link between the Covid jabs and cancer.
The SV 40 knocks out P53.  P53 is a cancer suppressor.
If that isn't bad enough-

32:35 mark, although it is worth listening to her entire speech.
The Sucker Punch-

Radiation
Chemical poisons > More aggressive cancer.

This is much worse than we realized. Not only are people more susceptible to coming down with cancer but SV 40 related cancers will not respond to chemo and radiation in the typical way. Instead they will cause the cancer to go wild.

She also notes that the Covid jabs for pediatrics has double the concentration in the pediatric doses.


https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/...forbidden/