(12-30-2025, 06:43 PM)quintessentone Wrote: The people were stating their experience, not feelz. Bubo falls out of the tree.
Bzzt, wrong. Look at the actual source data methodology for the poll you cited:
https://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content...1052-1.pdf
...rather than relying on summaries. Yes, there were questions in that poll about people's personal finances and household experience. But the summary you cited claims: "70% of Americans feel their cost of living is not very affordable or not affordable at all."
That's an inaccurate representation. The actual poll question was: "Overall, would you describe the cost of living in the area where you live for the average family as:" = Very affordable/Affordable:30% Not very affordable/Not affordable at all: 70%
That's asking for
perception of affordability for people beyond the scope of whom they know personally. A perception that is, as all things political, biased by what the news is pushing as the narrative and what people are being led to believe. It's
not personal first-hand experience based on actual numbers. It's what they've been told the "average family" is experiencing.
I'm no paid expert but the methodology itself looks fairly decent (although they did oversample under-45-age and under-50k-income by 4% vs the national average, which I'm not sure they normalized for; that may affect the trendlines they're trying to show).
As I've said, I don't really disagree with the poll: I
do think things are more expensive for people now that 10 years ago. But I
also think that this issue is being used as a political football and skewed by summary and agenda that improperly make conclusions based on a (possibly deliberate) misinterpretation of data.
I loved that owl from
Clash of the Titans! Saw a functioning replica of it at a scifi con once. It was cool!