COVID Vaccine “Safe and Effective” Narrative Collapses on Camera

[Thoughtful3]

  If the shot was so good why five years later are we seeing the highly vaxed countries with massive excess mortality rates, even these figures I suspect have been massaged because the obvious at this stage has to be admitted to and a number put on it. What we are seeing is an average of ten percent admitted to , which means that the disability rates must be straining the health and welfare systems to a breaking point or at least to a dangerous level of incompetence never been seen before. It is obvious that governments have been ignoring this so must be complicit to a high degree.
 Japan and Singapore have an even higher average, but Russia has dropped below the normal line and along with a lot of other eastern countries is no longer suffering excess mortality. Excess deaths 2025 - YouTube

From a personal perspective I tried to report a Covid jab adverse effect for a family member. It was rather strange because one would expect a Dr to complete the report. However early on the jabs were given out by unknown people so this broke the causality link.

Anyway I reported it and the VAERS system sent an e-mail requesting the lot number, something the family member for some reason was afraid to provide. The report was not accepted as a result. How many others faced issues at reporting the adverse events?

As for deaths, there has been a huge uptick. It is very strange to have so many neighbors and family members pass away so suddenly. Family members were in their 40's and early 50's.
Two went together to get the jab and they both passed away from cancer within months of each other.

Almost weekly I have friends that are suddenly contacting aggressive cancer.

[Thoughtful3]

  If the shot was so good why five years later are we seeing the highly vaxed countries with massive excess mortality rates, even these figures I suspect have been massaged because the obvious at this stage has to be admitted to and a number put on it. What we are seeing is an average of ten percent admitted to , which means that the disability rates must be straining the health and welfare systems to a breaking point or at least to a dangerous level of incompetence never been seen before. It is obvious that governments have been ignoring this so must be complicit to a high degree.
 Japan and Singapore have an even higher average, but Russia has dropped below the normal line and along with a lot of other eastern countries is no longer suffering excess mortality. Excess deaths 2025 - YouTube

The U.S. VAERS reporting system should have been revamped ages ago since it is well know that it captures only around 10% of the adverse events. Which means the numbers are much, much higher.

https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2582

The current book that I'm reading "The Deep State Goes viral" Lerman notes that Deborah Birx ordered hospitals to bypass the CDC and send all patient data to a central database in Washington. (July 2020) That means there are two sets of data, with one not visible to the public. It could be that they did the same with death data. In fact it would make sense if the goal is to not alarm the public.
This is also confirmed in the book "Warp Speed" by Paul Mango.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/us/po...virus.html

I have some other books I am waiting on. Not looking forward to 521 pages of mind numbing Birx recollections.

They are not going to get away with this- The Storm Is Here-

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/19279079...gr%5Etweet

[Thoughtful3]

I feel that this is very relevant because this gives us clear evidence of the manipulations that have taken place.

"Warp Speed" by Paul Mango

Pages 124- 126
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program [last updated in 2017] provided the outline for first symptom or adverse event that would be covered. The time period was 42 days. 
So initially the FDA provided guidance that the Covid jabs were not to be treated differently.

As we all observed this guidance changed over time.

On October 6, 2020 an unusual change in guidance was issued by the FDA.

On September 13th Albert Bourla [CEO of Pfizer] went on the CBS Face The Nation stating "We have a good chance that we will know if our product works by the end of October." He went on a number of different stations repeating the same.

Being the CEO one would expect that he would be privy to on-going clinical trial results.

On October 6th the FDA revised its guidance "on the topic of Development and Licensure of Vaccines to Prevent Covid-19"
Under the section labeled 'Safe and Effectiveness Information' the goal posts were moved. The follow-up days went from 42 to 60 days, which would mean that now Pfizer could not report positive clinical trial results until after the Presidential election.

Meet and greet Peter Marks - Director of the FDA CBER
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Marks_(physician)

Was this about the virus or the election?

"Why didn't Pfizer reveal their favorable data earlier? 
Bourla asserted that the revised guidance from the FDA precluded him from submitting his EUA application until later than originally anticipated..."

When Peter Marks was questioned about why the change in guidance he claimed it was to combat vaccine hesitancy. More time would give the appearance that they were being extra cautious.

He was on the Coronavirus Task Force. One might have expected him to consult with fellow members.

Not covered in the book-

While this was going on Brook Jackson, Pfizer Covid-19 clinical trial whistleblower-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk

[Thoughtful3]

Page 138
"Moderna became a partner with the government in early 2020, even prior to the official formation of Operation Warp Speed, and developed its vaccine in conjunction with and investment from the NIH. We then helped it expand manufacturing capacity and set up clinical trial sites. We guaranteed purchase of its output. We also granted it 'Defense Production Act' privileges, giving it priority rating for raw materials and other supplies."

When it came up for review 20 out of 21 members recommended an EUA.
I'm not certain what the point was since " Moderna had already manufactured 1.3 million doses that were ready to ship throughout the country." Page 139.

It gets more bizarre-

In 2017 bioMerieux, a French firm, helped China build the Bio Level 4 lab in Wuhan. Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna also worked for bioMerieux prior to the plandemic.

Just seems a very odd coincidence.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wuhan-lab-air...07775.html

"Multiple requests for lab maintenance were outstanding including repair for an environmental air disinfection system and hazardous water treatment system."
They now believe the virus was circulating in September 2019.

Then there is this slip by Bancel at the WEF-
"How about we make a billion doses next year? Yeah we need to make a billion doses next year, there's going to be a pandemic" December 2019.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-mo...8794971352
https://www.biomerieux.com/us/en/journal...nce%202004.

Up until this point Moderna had not manufactured any successful vaccines.

HHS has just canceled Moderna's contract to manufacture an mRNA jab for the Bird Flu-
https://www.wyff4.com/article/hhs-cancel...e/64914703

"The reality is that mRNA technology remains untested, and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration, which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public."

[DontTreadOnMe]

Is there a link to the data that breaks down cause of death?  Remember that this is post-Covid, and at least 13% of the world's population that were sick with Covid ended up with long Covid, which is VERY debilitating and poses severe health risks and can make existing conditions worse.  source

Again, looking for published data and not videos.  A very charming person can present incorrect information in a very persuasive way while a dry-sounding expert might sound less convincing.  In print, you can't hear the emotional overtones so you get a better piece of information to evaluate.

I don't know how many people you  know, but almost everyone I know says their health is less than it was pre-2020.
All of them had Covid at least once.  Many were not vaxxed.  Many had at least minimal long covid, and some linger with a small variety of around 200 LC symptoms to this day.
Several have long covid to the point that their life are seriously altered.  A few have moderate ME/CFS.  Some cancers.

Are you telling me you know no one with long covid?  Everyone you know feels 100% like they did before covid.
And, trust me, I am taking aging into account here.

The data you cherish is only as good as the data keepers allow.

[chr0naut]

Information is now becoming mainstream that the alleged vaccine for Covid was less than safe and effective.
COVID Vaccine “Safe and Effective” Narrative Collapses on Camera

Vax or don't vax.  Makes no difference to me.  And this isn't about whether or not one took the shot.

But there should always be a choice. When there is no choice, and when the information from the government or medical community is not fairly presented, there should be the ability for citizens to have recourse.

The truth is that of the billions immunized, that very few had adverse reactions at all, and that millions died of a disease that is now less fatal after the immunizations were introduced. The turn around in levels of mortality due to the disease coincided with the immunizations and was rapid and clear.

The immunizations were both safe and effective for the vast majority. A few negative cases do not counter that. Medicine has always been a game of numbers for the greater good.

The only people who tried to actually help or save peoples lives are being denigrated by those who have done nothing, and have spread misinformation and doom porn by suggesting that the ONLY good guys were the bad guys.

The numbers are in. The pandemic is over. Countries both stopped and turned around outbreaks of the disease. The methods they used were provably effective, despite the lies that were promulgated by social media pundits.

Those who promoted vaccine hesitancy are culpable for the incubation of the disease and for those people who died and who could have been saved.

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

I think the push to safely return to normal (as fast as possible) led them to duplicate a virus science didn't know enough about yet, including the reach of its long term destructive abilities. 

There's troubling evidence for the long covid afflicted.

They said it causes "arthritis-like symptoms" for a year after infection instead of saying it causes the early onset of arthritis in some patients. Early onset a bunch of things. 

And it's almost deserved to unleash batshit crazy RFK Jr. on Covid-Era CDC, because they also tried to say there's no connection between Covid and infertility. 

But at least google stopped lying to people about that... so damn often.

Quote provided by Gemini AI (Google):

"Does long covid cause fertility problems?"

While research is still ongoing, there's emerging evidence that Long COVID can potentially impact fertility, particularly in women. 

The current understanding is:

1. Potential Impact on Female Reproductive Health:

• Changes in menstrual cycles, including alterations in length, flow, and pain, have been linked to Long COVID.

• Some studies suggest a possible link between Long COVID and reduced ovarian reserve, which is a measure of a woman's remaining egg supply. This could potentially impact fertility.

• Long COVID may cause hormonal imbalances, including fluctuations in estrogen, progesterone, and cortisol levels, which are important for reproductive function.

• There have been a few case reports of POI following COVID-19 infection, which is a condition where the ovaries stop functioning normally before the age of 40. 

It's almost like the nature of what covid does made them hastily engineer an infertility shot...

No one can be blamed for seeing the devil here. I can't deny people's right to think WEF like influence engineered a surreptitious population control/menopause acceleration virus.

Not exactly proving untrue for women under 45 with long covid either.

I think they figured out the reach of the virus after they administered half the world with vaccines and said, "What have we done? No one must know this killer mistake."

Because, everything I read and have experienced with long covid (never vaccinated) suggests it is like a biological clock accelerator.

[annonentity]

I think the push to safely return to normal (as fast as possible) led them to duplicate a virus science didn't know enough about yet, including the reach of its long term destructive abilities. 

There's troubling evidence for the long covid afflicted.

They said it causes "arthritis-like symptoms" for a year after infection instead of saying it causes the early onset of arthritis in some patients. Early onset a bunch of things. 

And it's almost deserved to unleash batshit crazy RFK Jr. on Covid-Era CDC, because they also tried to say there's no connection between Covid and infertility. 

But at least google stopped lying to people about that... so damn often.

Quote provided by Gemini AI (Google):

"Does long covid cause fertility problems?"

It's almost like the nature of what covid does made them hastily engineer an infertility shot...

No one can be blamed for seeing the devil here. I can't deny people's right to think WEF like influence engineered a surreptitious population control/menopause acceleration virus.

Not exactly proving untrue for women under 45 with long covid either.

I think they figured out the reach of the virus after they administered half the world with vaccines and said, "What have we done? No one must know this killer mistake."

Because, everything I read and have experienced with long covid (never vaccinated) suggests it is like a biological clock accelerator.

  The more shots that you have seem to accelerate the terminal event even faster. One in seventeen people according to conservative data had a reportable problem after the one shot. If they had two shots the chances would drop to eight-point five percent. Three shots four point two five and so on.These were the problems that were noted, notwithstanding the longer-term chronic inflammation issues that would show up down the line. Which could be written off as nothing to do with the shot. However I have noticed just about  everybody who has had the shot has some sort of health issue some have died some are handling the dysfunction, Japan for instance is running at about a twenty percent higher pre Covid death rate, my guess is that this is a highly stressed society, which will have a great deal to do with higher mortality, Deagle said that certain countries will have a big fall in population in 25, failing economics was said to be the causal factor, this would be a big stressor on already compromised  immune systems. 
  The military tactic is not to kill but to injure, as it ties up many more people to treat the sick on a long term basis and thus a general weakening of a population to resist, this must be happening as the long term disability stats are so high that doctors are now suggesting end of life procedures to put people out of their misery, in a rational world the highest level would be implementing emergency legislation by now to control the situation. They haven't so must be complicit.

[Byrd]

I don't know how many people you  know, but almost everyone I know says their health is less than it was pre-2020.
All of them had Covid at least once.  Many were not vaxxed.  Many had at least minimal long covid, and some linger with a small variety of around 200 LC symptoms to this day.
Several have long covid to the point that their life are seriously altered.  A few have moderate ME/CFS.  Some cancers.

Are you telling me you know no one with long covid?  Everyone you know feels 100% like they did before covid.
And, trust me, I am taking aging into account here.

The data you cherish is only as good as the data keepers allow.

Almost everyone I know was vaxxed and kept up with boosters.  Of the few who caught Covid several got it from before vaccines were available (and yes, some died.)   The ones who refused vaccines (perhaps 10?) have had multiple Covid infections.  I think that several of them have long Covid, but I haven't really investigated it.

The ones who had boosters had mild cases.

The groups I am part of do a lot of public speaking (or teach) and are often in crowds of several hundred (for me, I will be at events of up to 10,000 people at a convention center twice a year).  Most of us wear masks if we fly, and everyone gets vaccines.  The elders in the groups have the standard age-related problems (arthritis) that aren't getting any better.

I'm actually doing BETTER than I was before Covid, but part of that is that I hired a personal trainer and he's been bullying me into exercise twice a week.  As a result, my physical strength is quite good and the cardiologist has started stepping down my heart medication because I've lost weight.

[Byrd]

  The more shots that you have seem to accelerate the terminal event even faster. One in seventeen people according to conservative data had a reportable problem after the one shot. If they had two shots the chances would drop to eight-point five percent. Three shots four point two five and so on.These were the problems that were noted, notwithstanding the longer-term chronic inflammation issues that would show up down the line. 

My husband and I have had the initial two vaccines plus five boosters.  My son's had five and so have many of my friends because we do public speaking and we teach.

Other than a slight fever and "Not Feeling So Good The Day After" (which happens with many vaccines such as flu and herpes and pneumonia), there's been no problems.  

I realize that this is a small sample of around 1,000 people and, as I've said, they're teachers and public speakers so everyone else's mileage can vary.