Bilderbergers At It Again.

[IgnorantGod]

The very definition of a conspiracy is two or more people planning something to further their goals. You make out like it’s just a bunch of business people making deals behind closed doors. Have you just ignored the topics they cover in their agendas over the years? 

Never mind nothing to see here folks…move along.

And here I thought the essence of a conspiracy was an act against one or more people in their back (that is, in the shadow).

Its like people think information about conspiracies can be found in the public domain; its not. Sometime you have to be dirty to fetch critical information.

Other time it comes at the risk of your life if you get caught. In that regards, I doubt any real info will pop up on the internet, well at least not youtube in my opinion.

But then again, what do I know? Nothing, really. I'm just applying my logic, which is as faillible as anyone else. So it might be that there are some factions within oligarchy that want and crave control (all of them is also possible, despite being less probable).

I do think there's a push for techno-convergence of the human species, of which some public figures endorse.

I've noticed a pattern when it comes to conspiracy topics, both sides (the one pushing the story and the skeptics) tends to assume governing entities as homogenous. I mean, aren't those institutions the battleground for the clash of biggest ambitions and idealisms, from the most talented people with deceptive and manipulative behavior in their country?

Sometime you just need the right person at the right place to compromise a whole group/country.

[Karl12]

That's a great quote but i wonder if its truly attributed.

Thanks for the heads up mate, pretty tame sentiment for Goebbels but will look through his propaganda material - originally came across it in this documentary as stated by Professor Mark Miller from New York University.










That doco is actually a pretty relevant one as it deals with the inherent dangers of corporate media monopoly caused by the 'Telecommunications Act' where all existing safeguard regulations were flushed down the toilet (link).

It was enacted by Bill Clinton who was originally just some obscure Arkansas Governor until he attended the 1991 Bilderberg meeting and one year later became U.S. President.

Funnily enough nobody had heard of Tony Blair either.. until he attended the 1993 Bilderberg meeting and four years later became UK Prime Minister.

Former AFP editor James P. Tucker says Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission are good at picking future American presidents. He says, "Actually, they like to own both horses in a two-horse race. Here is the line-up: Jerry Ford, Bilderberg; Jimmy Carter, Trilateral; President Bush the Elder; Trilateral and Bill Clinton, Bilderberg." In fact, Clinton was an obscure Governor from Arkansas when he attended the conference in 1991; a year later he was elected president.

Gets a bit confusing at times with the Bilderberg, TC, CFR etc. so below is a handy breakdown.

• "Cecil Rhodes' secret society incited the Boer War and spawned the Milner Group (1902), the Milner Group spawned the Round Table Group (1909), the Round Table Group incited World War I and spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (1919) and the Council on Foreign Relations (1921), and the CFR and the RIIA spawned the Bilderberg Group in 1954, and the Trilateral Commission in 1973."

Stanley Monteith.

Cheers.

[SurferSoul]

I will move along from this thread because for me personally, there is nothing to see here. It's the status quo, it's the same thing over again (same shit, different decade), it is quid pro quo.

Yeah I suppose corruption, conspiracy and manipulation is the status quo, ( good band btw :)) 
Most definitely.

[SurferSoul]

And here I thought the essence of a conspiracy was an act against one or more people in their back (that is, in the shadow).

Yeah you’re right, I couldn’t be arsed searching for the proper definition we all know what it is anyway and how it itself is used in a defamatory way.

great post btw

[Karl12]

Overall, we rate the Corbett Report a Tin Foil Hat conspiracy and Moderate pseudoscience website..

The factual source links are literally right there - can I ask why you did not address them?

Do you think Corbett hoaxed the pdf files to the Rockefeller annual reports?

Regarding the authors of that descriptor don't know if they've looked recently but folks who just mindlessly swallow what is being spoonfed to them by private corporate media entities are finding themselves in an increasingly small minority (about 30%) - is that the 'we' they are talking about?

Am not suggesting a conditioned response on your part but hopefully you'll explore the sourced material and arrive at your own conclusions - would also say it's incredibly irresponsible and dangerous (and lazy) to label everyone who disagrees with the official narrative as 'far right' (which Corbett absolutely isn't).

Exquisitely ironic when you realize he's exposing the Rockefellers who maintained incredibly close ties with Nazi Germany (financing SS Chief Himmler's Keppler fund as late as 1944); I.G. Farben (Hitler's largest donor and the corporate sponsors of Auschwitz) and founded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes (Director Rüdin helped with Aktion T4 whilst Head Doctor Verschuer 'mentored' Dr Mengele).

More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America funded Germany's eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost $4 million in 21st-Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.

Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.

Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade."

A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their research into heredity. The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.

Scroll Down

Won't go into examples of their more recent pathological behaviour (including child experimentation in Guatemala) but what they've got lined up for the future with their Hastings Centre (and the WEF Future Health Committee) is also extremely concerning and the elephant in the room really seems to be the re-emergence of (the pseudoscience of) eugenics.

• "They had to pursue a strategy … called “crypto-eugenics.” In essence, “You seek to fulfill the aims of eugenics without disclosing what you are really aiming at and without mentioning the word.” This is how the Eugenics Society conceived of its funding for the IPPF."

Matthew Connelly.

[Karl12]

Just wondering to myself that this is supposed to be a conspiracy site, about all things covered up and the shenanigans behind it all, right?..

That's the idea matey - I appreciate the post and when it comes to 'apathy' (programmed or not) let's hope we all don't end up like the mice in this experiment.

Regarding how the general public are hoodwinked into accepting things against their best interest am sure many folks on these boards (or at least this forum) are well aware of concepts like 'Hegelian Dialectic' and 'pressure from above and below'.

Reason I bring it up is that there's a short history of Hegel's dialectic below from Alan Wat and thought it exposed quite a number of things.. including how Hegel was sponsered by 'rich industrialists' to write it.

The Corbett Report calls Alan Watt’s radio program to get some information about G.W.F. Hegel and the dialectic.

Audio

Also found this vid insanely relevant as 'men from Business International Roundtables' and 'Rockefeller money' are being specifically mentioned.

Management by crisis:


• The first step (thesis) is to create a problem.

• The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria).

• The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Whatever anyone's political affiliations also thought some fair points were being made.here about how 'well funded, non governmental foundations sponsoring activist groups, agitators and agent provocateurs to create massive civil unrest '.

Definitely starting to sound a bit familiar.

Cheers.

[Karl12]

It's like people think information about conspiracies can be found in the public domain.

There are some relevant examples here which are admittedly pretty tame - I'm sure lots of people were scoffing at the time though (until they were shown to be 'true').

Just speculation but there's some post Bilderberg examination below regarding the formalization of the 'financial integration' of private bank account savings from European citizens (similar to the 2008 Greek 'bail ins' only on a continental level).










The commentator also brings up the 'Bank For International Settlements' which somehow magically operates 'beyond the reach of national or international law'.

Don't know if you caught the other video but here's a follow up:

[IgnorantGod]

I have to admit that there are information, or connections that might give a glimpse to a current unfolding conspiracy. Though, those that catch up on it would probably know at that point that blattering it on youtube is both dangerous for themselves and the information they would collect after their initial suspicion.

Now, I certainly don't want to start a political mud slinging, nor drift the thread on another target than the builderburgers, but in my opinion, Trump, whatever his reasons/agendas in running president has done quite the damage on people perception of internet contents credibility around the globe.

His 'Fake News' slogan that he first threw at the media corporates has been weaponized against the population that have access to internet. Nowadays, instead of debating, people just call 'Fake News' at anything that disagree with their world, without even trying to take any small bits of information that could be pertinent whether a 'Fake News' or not.

The line has been blurried between real journalists that got fired for being journalists, and conmen that either want to make a profit out of the gullibles, or are useful idiots that believes the information they are fed in public domain and propagate them to further muddy the waters.

Anyway, I love your threads, and I'm glad you're here on Deny Ignorance. Looking forward for more info.

PS. I don't always watch the videos you post but sometime yes. And I found extremely interesting the conference from a former biologist IIRC? in your thread about Neuralink's experiments on animals. Especially the parasites part lol.

[SurferSoul]

Its like people think information about conspiracies can be found in the public domain; its not. Sometime you have to be dirty to fetch critical information.

Other time it comes at the risk of your life if you get caught. In that regards, I doubt any real info will pop up on the internet, well at least not youtube in my opinion.

Well it can sometimes, other times we rely on journalists such as Daphne (to my shame I forget her last name) she was murdered in a car bomb for her work in uncovering The Panama Papers, which she sent to major press organisations who then reported it to the public. She was threatened and harassed while doing her investigation, but bravely carried on anyway. RIP. 

She is not alone, others have been murdered, imprisoned and even tortured. 

Then there is an another tactic, one which works quite well. Throw out ridiculous “conspiracy theory’s” to muddy the waters. Giving the general public the impression that it’s just “crazy’s” on the internet with their flat earth rubbish, and aliens built the pyramids. Thanks to the efforts of the CIA the term conspiracy theorists is synonymous with nutters. 

As you have pointed out with fake news in your last reply, nobody knows what to trust anymore. Exactly as intended. But then people claim they “trust the science” well if you don’t truly fully comprehend the science, what is it you’re trusting exactly? Basically you have faith in the new quasi religion scientism. Sure we need to listen to the experts as we can’t know or verify everything for ourselves, certainly, but we should at least seek out second and third opinions. Especially when a former expert is now dismissed a conspiracy theorist. See how it works?

[IgnorantGod]

Well it can sometimes, other times we rely on journalists such as Daphne (to my shame I forget her last name) she was murdered in a car bomb for her work in uncovering The Panama Papers, which she sent to major press organisations who then reported it to the public. She was threatened and harassed while doing her investigation, but bravely carried on anyway. RIP. 

Yes, I do tend to write in absolutism at times, I call it an habit.

The quoted part is exactly why I wrote that these people won't just films themselves in front of a webcam and post it on youtube. They'll do as that woman did and send their entire work to several press entities to be sure that some of them (or some people within them) will not be compromised and share it to the world through various media (which in these time and age, might be youtube like platforms).

I also agree with an obscur effort to make people equal conspiracy theorists to paranoid nutz, and its working wonderfully. I have to give credit where credit is due, despite my hating it sometimes lol.

BTW, thanks for the example of the panama papers which is still recent.