(03-17-2025, 09:30 AM)Kwaka Wrote: Reverse transcriptase is a genetic feedback mechanism. As for what exactly triggers it gets hazy. Every cell in your body with DNA has a potential to perform it.
Reverse transcription is a process, but Reverse Transcript
ase is a chemical, an enzyme.
While all eucaryotic cells utilize reverse transcription, its process and function in nature is not really a mystery.
One example is Telomerase, a reverse transcription enzyme that is present and functional in all human cells where it slows down the degradation of the DNA from 'fraying' at its ends, by adding to the telomeres which exist the ends of the chromosomes.
Reverse transcriptase - Wikipedia
Quote:This is why some people are still testing positive to spike protein despite their last injection being years ago.
No, people are still testing positive for the spike protein because it is part of the the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which they have.
The presence of the spike protein is a fairly sure indicator that the person has an active infection of the virus.
The virus is now endemic and infectious. People are catching, and re-catching it, all the time now.
Quote:More technically, SV40 is a genetic sequence.
SV40 is 'Simian Vacuolating Virus 40', a virus.
A virus is more than just a genomic sequence.
SV40 - Wikipedia
Quote:A virus has a cell wall around the genetic material.
Viruses do not have cell walls.
They do have an outer region of proteins called a capsid. Most, but not all, viruses also have a coat of proteins as well, but the dividing line between what is coat, and what is capsid, is often arguable.
Quote:SV40 can be a part of a virus, bacteria or anything with a genetic sequence.
SV40 is a
virus that infects simians such as humans and monkeys.
It was discovered that some of the SV40 genomic code made the virus more likely to transcribe and this discovery has led to the use of snippets of the code from SV40 to aid in the transcription of mRNA in the laboratory and in medicines. These snippets of code are called '
promoters'.
Note that the
promoter sequences from SV40, are
not the virus SV40.
Quote:In humans, this genetic sequence is well known to suppress cancer fighting mechanisms and increase cancer rates.
Back in 1950's and 60's there was a contamination of Polio vaccines with SV40 virus. At the time, there was concern that that there appeared to be a rise in cancers in people who had taken the vaccine.
However, 35 years of population studies have not shown
any rise in cancer prevalence in those who had taken the contaminated vaccines.
This has turned around views on SV40 such that it has now been used as an FDA approved viral vector for delivery of gene therapies and vaccines.
SV40, while it does cause cancers in rats, does not appear to cause cancers in humans. Just doesn't.
Issues: SV40 - FactCheck.org
Quote:In drug production, cancer is a good thing to keep an immortal cell line of fine tuned drug production cells alive. With things like CRISPER, they can be tuned to make many things,
I won't disagree with that.
Quote:like the RNA sequence for the spike protein as one example.
However, mRNA therapies and vaccines aren't optimally produced by using bio-reactors. They don't produce the lipid encapsulated mRNA strands with enough purity and the very processes of maintaining living cells, and separating cellular contents chemically degrades mRNA.
Quote:The initial batches of COVID products developed used a PCR method to copy the mRNA. This method has less genetic contamination. Will still be some misreads and broken fragments. It is also more expensive to perform on mass scale. It got it through the 'safe & effective' stamp.
I'm sure that companies with mRNA products would make use of any economies of scale in their engineering that they could.
Basically, PCR production requires minute amounts of reagents, ultra pure water, a seed genomic sequence, the polymerase enzyme and then cycles of warming and cooling, between which you can test for ongoing batch purity.
The end products are extremely pure mRNA, trace amounts of the reagent chemical remnants, and highly pure water. This can then be protected by the addition of lipid oils and ultrasonic agitation to achieve an even coating of the mRNA molecules. Then you give the batch a final test, separate it into deployable packaging and flash freeze it.
It's more expensive than bio reactors, but it does produce a close to finished product, where bio-reactors don't.
Quote:For mass production, a different production process was used and tagged behind the 'safe & effective' stamp. The process is similar to brewing a batch of alcohol, pour in your yeast, some sugar and come back in a week or two. As for how good the distillation process was to only capture the spike mRNA at the end? A lot of room for improvement.
How do you get just mRNA out of a biological mush?
RNA is fragile, and not as stable chemically as DNA or proteins.
How can you further distil something that is damaged by heat and the longer you work on it, the more it is likely to degrade due to RNase?
Quote:... Snip (to remove the 'peacocking misinformation agents' video) ...
How is that data around Barry Young from New Zealand going? Maybe one reason you ani't seeing any data about the negative side of the vaccinations is that you need some better sources not as afraid or compromised.
Barry Young claimed that the data he leaked showed that millions of people had died from the Comirnaty shots (the only one approved at the time in New Zealand). Basically, he said that 1 in 1,000 people who had taken the shot had died. That is easily testable.
Barry Young had edited out records that did not support his opinion. The data he uploaded was not the full dataset that he stole, but was cherry-picked to fit his doom-porn fantasies.
Is there any evidence of these 'megadeaths', now that we are years down the track? Nope. Look at population statistics from
every single country around the world. It's ludicrously false and especially so in New Zealand.
And he got arrested because he revealed the personally identifying information of about 12,000 people, not because he was some sort of whistle-blower (weird, how the full dataset at the time would have had more than three million records, roughly 60%+ of the population had taken the 'shot', but he only presented 12,000 records?).
Barry's criminal court case will be held on 28th of next month where he stands charged of "Dishonest Use of a Computer". He is claiming that he is protected by whistle-blower legislation, i.e.: the 'Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022', but it is clear that the data he uploaded was a tiny subset.
He also was not sacked, nor was he prosecuted by his employer, Health NZ. He resigned - voluntarily.
Barry's infringement was fairly minor in the scheme of things, but the whole thing has been stage-managed to make it appear to be something that it isn't, by Liz Gunn's M.O.A.R campaign and allied anti-vax disinformation agents.
Who'd have thought?
