Epstein Archive
 



  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BREAKING NEWS: Slovak Government Official Claims DNA in Vaccines
#1
In a bombshell press conference on March 11, 2025, Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP, dropped a jaw-dropping claim: all 34 analyzed Pfizer and Moderna vaccine batches contain dangerously high levels of DNA, potentially transforming recipients into "genetically modified organisms."





With English subtitles:

BREAKING NEWS - Slovak Government Official: DNA Contaminated Vaccines Are Turning People into "GMOs" - FULL CONFERENCE
If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter - George Washington
Reply
#2


Dr John Campbell goes through one study that has found very high levels of DNA contamination, including SV40.

Good to hear more governments are waking up to the reality of the situation.
Reply
#3
(03-16-2025, 07:13 AM)Kwaka Wrote: Good to hear more governments are waking up to the reality of the situation.


Yes, now I just want my country to wake up, but I guess our leaders (they are not my leaders) are afraid of the anger they would get from the people who took these vaccines.

I read about the DNA contamination some years ago in a science paper - this should of course be investigated more so we can get the facts 100%.

I hope all this is false because I don't want vaccinated to suffer more. I think we all have suffered enough since the corona madness. It really is time for healing and joy to come back because too much suffering will make more people sick because our immune system can't take too much stress.
If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter - George Washington
Reply
#4
There's ethanol in my vodka!

It's a mRNA vaccine that uses plasmids to synthesize the mRNA, no one should be surpised by this, and why wouldn't there be DNA fragments? All you have to do is look up "how vaccines are made." These aren't intact proteins that can alter the DNA, and if they are, and can incorporate into the DNA of or mutate the individual in some way, we've actually just made a major breakthrough in gene therapy unintentionally.

You can't be surprised there's DNA fragments in a partial DNA vaccine

In other news: The counter order to progressive order is set. So shall it be that USA, Russia, Belarus, Hungary, and Slovakia form an alliance to all be bat shit crazy conspiracy theorists together.
[Image: New-sig-V6.68.jpg][Image: Screenshot_20250212_223830_Sketchbook.jpg]



Reply
#5
"Experimental" ... using new methods, ideas, substances, etc. that have not been tried before, usually in order to find out what effect they have
(loosely cp'd from cambridge.org)

They told us so from the beginning...
(The definition of "vaccine" however was changed to be inclusive of this, "the new technology" being 'experimentally' applied to this "crisis.")

Obfuscations of 'marketing' ensued, social media was weaponized, people were motivated by sentiment to 'engage' with the experiment. 
Systemic protections for the beneficiaries of the commerce were explicitly implemented...

People - hitherto conditioned to "trust the science" assumed that also meant you could naturally trust the "business" of science... aaand here we are. 

Much of the public is clearly aware of what appears to have taken place now... as they survey the aftermath...
personal health-wise,
governance 'policy'-wise,
local economy-wise...
oh my.

This particular 'event' in our global history must never be glossed over as an 'it is what it is' thing... but it seems someone is trying to make it exactly that...

If, as some speculate, this actually was the consequence of some strictly 'not public' effort to exploit the population and/or the tools of governance, I have to expect they will try again... and again... because... they are clearly being paid to. 

Go figure.
Reply
#6
(03-16-2025, 11:55 AM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: There's ethanol in my vodka!

It's a mRNA vaccine that uses plasmids to synthesize the mRNA, no one should be surpised by this, and why wouldn't there be DNA fragments? All you have to do is look up "how vaccines are made." These aren't intact proteins that can alter the DNA, and if they are, and can incorporate into the DNA of or mutate the individual in some way, we've actually just made a major breakthrough in gene therapy unintentionally.

You can't be surprised there's DNA fragments in a partial DNA vaccine

In other news: The counter order to progressive order is set. So shall it be that USA, Russia, Belarus, Hungary, and Slovakia form an alliance to all be bat shit crazy conspiracy theorists together.

from your "Wikipedia" link

It's all relatively new, it's perfectly normal to be skeptical AF. Your post makes it sound as if this is a mastered and completely understood process when it is not.

 
Quote:edit
As of 2021 no DNA vaccines have been approved for human use in the United States. Few experimental trials have evoked a response strong enough to protect against disease and the technique's usefulness remains to be proven in humans.

In August 2021, Indian authorities gave emergency approval to ZyCoV-D. Developed by Cadila Healthcare, it is the first DNA vaccine against COVID-19.[sup][5][/sup]

Additionally, the main delivery method" injection" and its being used intra-dermally or musculature both require the largest amounts of DNA and the th1 response may not be the response required

It was literally a shot in the dark, and we know we never reached the vaccination levels that would have prevented the spread, plenty of evidence good old natural immunity played a huge part. Hell FAWK the vaccinations made it last longer than if we had let it run its natural course 


[Image: Screenshot%202025-03-16_14-12-55-127.jpg]




[Image: Screenshot%202025-03-16_14-13-27-020.jpg]
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....                                                                                                                   
Professor
Neil Ellwood Peart  
Reply
#7
The SV40 promoter is a small snippet of genomic code that can exist in both DNA and RNA forms. Its function is to promote transcription. It is not the full code of the SV40 virus, but is something that we learned from studying the SV40 virus, that allows the virus (and other things genomic) to initiate transcription more easily.

The presence of the initiator code from SV40 cannot cause an SV40 infection (it isn't the whole virus) and as it can be expressed in both DNA and RNA, it isn't even an indicator of the presence of DNA in vaccines.

DNA from sources outside of the organism can also be injected into cells, and nothing happens, except the immune system identifies it as foreign and destroys the cell that contains it, deleting the foreign DNA in the process.

For DNA to work as a 'gene therapy', the DNA needs to be very, very similar to the host organisms DNA. In laboratory, this is achieved by taking the host organisms DNA and making modifications to it. To do so is a complicated process usually involving cutting the DNA strand at very exact points (usually using CRISPR/CAS9) and then merging other specifically cut sequences in such a way that only a very few bases are modified, and the edited DNA (hopefully) wont be rejected.

This same process occurs in nature and allows our DNA to 'capture' foreign DNA segments to enhance our immunity against pathogens that contain the 'foreign' DNA (Note: it is an immunity process!).

So if we did, in fact, capture 'foreign' DNA that was injected into the cell, it would most probably create strong immunity against anything carrying the sequence. Quite the opposite to the doom porn being pedalled by these nut-job anti-vaxxers that are implying that we would be genetically modified.

You know, a hundred years ago, people were saying that getting immunized against smallpox with cowpox, would turn us all into cows. Mooooosies...

Lol
Support the Christchurch Call
Reply
#8
(03-16-2025, 12:35 PM)Maxmars Wrote: ......

(The definition of "vaccine" however was changed to be inclusive of this, "the new technology" being 'experimentally' applied to this "crisis.")

.........
So what?

The definition of "vaccine" has always been changing, as our scientific and technological understanding of Biology has improved.  The first vaccine was a live Cowpox virus used to provide some level of immunity to the more deadly Smallpox virus, adopted in Europe about 300 years ago.  The name "vaccine" derives from the Variolae vaccinae (smallpox of the cow).  Other types of vaccines developed over the years (before the mRNA types) include: inactivated viruses, live-attenuated viruses, subunit, recombinant, polysaccharide, and conjugate vaccines, toxoid vaccines, and viral vector vaccines.  Most of these have come along in the last 75 years or so because the understanding of DNA as the genetic code of life didn't occur until about  1952.  Once that happened our understanding of molecular biology exploded exponentially. 

Is there some good reason we should ignore 300 years of scientific progress?
Reply
#9
(03-16-2025, 11:55 AM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote:  These aren't intact proteins that can alter the DNA, and if they are, and can incorporate into the DNA of or mutate the individual in some way, we've actually just made a major breakthrough in gene therapy unintentionally.

Did you miss that part on reverse transcriptase? A natural process where RNA is written back into the DNA sequence. It is a rare process that does not happen all the time, but when getting injected with billions of gene sequences it is no surprise that some people have become a permanent spike protein factory.
Reply
#10
(03-16-2025, 05:20 PM)chr0naut Wrote: The presence of the initiator code from SV40 cannot cause an SV40 infection

So you are saying that using a cancerous cell line for a cheep mass production of spike protein cannot cause cancer from the genetic contamination present in the manufacturing process?

This does not fit with the reports of an increase in cancers, including more aggressive cancers at a younger ages.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peer-reviewed evidence: Pfizer mRNA vaccines contain DNA contamination LightAngel 24 590 04-04-2025, 07:36 AM
Last Post: quintessentone
  60 million contaminated COVID vaccines have been administered to innocent Australians putnam6 3 172 02-26-2025, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Maxmars
  Bill Gates Ordered to STAND TRIAL Over COVID-19 Vaccines LightAngel 7 459 10-27-2024, 11:57 PM
Last Post: LightAngel
  Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths K218b 10 703 06-12-2024, 11:28 PM
Last Post: TheRedneck
  One type of influenza B is extinct - out of future vaccines. Maxmars 0 152 03-10-2024, 06:03 PM
Last Post: Maxmars