7 |
82 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

10-22-2025, 06:53 AM
This post was last modified: 10-22-2025, 05:10 PM by TheWay. 
In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease (Marcus Zervos) at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world (Henry Ford Health): conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. Marcus took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day... until now.
This video explores a suppressed truth: the growing and catastrophic health crisis linked to widespread childhood vaccination. It examines data, testimonies, and patterns often suppressed and ignored by mainstream science and media, inviting open discussion and critical thinking. It also sheds light on the culture of silence driven by institutional censorship and fear of reprisal within the medical establishment.
The film and the study can also be viewed and downloaded here: https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/
176 |
2,961 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
Mod. Note
Please add more contents to your opening post.
New posting standards will be implemented soon, so a paragraph or two of introduction is required; especially for those who cannot watch videos.
Thank you
130 |
1,094 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

54% of kids in the states have a chronic disease ...if true think about the ramifications ...
11 |
892 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

The documentary is about how a reputable scientist that has studied contentious issues like the Flint water supply before, has had his job threatened if he was to publish a study he performed comparing the overall health between the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
The results of this study are similar to others that investigate this issue, the unvaccinated are generally healthier with a significant reduction in chronic illness. Overall it highlights a systemic illness in scientific integrity as economic and political measures are used to suppress critical information of significant public concern.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Is the study still unpublished? Is there a link available?
I was wondering if it controlled for things like vaccine-hesitant parents also being wary of highly-processed foods.
226 |
2,890 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-22-2025, 07:26 AM)Kwaka Wrote: The documentary is about how a reputable scientist that has studied contentious issues like the Flint water supply before, has had his job threatened if he was to publish a study he performed comparing the overall health between the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
The results of this study are similar to others that investigate this issue, the unvaccinated are generally healthier with a significant reduction in chronic illness. Overall it highlights a systemic illness in scientific integrity as economic and political measures are used to suppress critical information of significant public concern.
what if...what if the sick and vulnerable went for vaccines because they needed it or thought they did. maybe that is skewing results. healthy people probably didn't worry as much. looking at economics as in the peoples that are sick and lifestyles would also be interesting, this ties into essential workers and anyone else that would have been persuaded to get the jab
why do they want emails? and where is the report? I only see a video
“This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”
I only see reference docs, maybe I'm blind. I immediately distrust anyone that does a premiere and don't just give information that is claimed to be of the utmost importance. Kind of looks like fishing for political targeting, I'm sure that is against the law these days and abuse of PI
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Oh it's Del Bigtree. I like him. If you don't know who he is, Wikipedia makes it clear that he is objective, reasonable, and should be taken seriously:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_Bigtree
Haha I am kidding! They do not! Their article on him is a riot.
11 |
1,204 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

10-22-2025, 11:47 AM
This post was last modified: 10-22-2025, 12:00 PM by BeyondKnowledge. 
What if it is all just the fact that there is medicine?
Just over a hundred years ago, only the strong survived to adulthood.
If you look at humans like an infection, a partially effective cure makes the infection stronger. Now we pretty much have no really effective disinfectant and almost all survive.
Kind of an evil way of looking at it though it may be true. Societal breakdown by medical treatment.
Now for the vaccines, it is too profitable a business.
They should be tested just like every other drug. They should also be tested for interaction problems. Too many in a short time might be the problem with vaccines.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
226 |
2,890 |
| JOINED: |
Oct 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-22-2025, 11:28 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Oh it's Del Bigtree. I like him. If you don't know who he is, Wikipedia makes it clear that he is objective, reasonable, and should be taken seriously:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_Bigtree
Haha I am kidding! They do not! Their article on him is a riot.

Now you opened up a can of worms, firstly the date of 2016 is interesting
Quote:Bigtree produced the film Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, based on the discredited[1][2][3] views of Andrew Wakefield on an alleged connection between vaccines and autism. The film debuted in 2016 and was widely panned by critics. The epidemiologist Ian Lipkin wrote that "as a documentary it misrepresents what science knows about autism, undermines public confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines, and attacks the integrity of legitimate scientists and public-health officials."[10][21]
"ultra-jews" so many other choices could have been made here
Quote:In New York State, in 2019, Bigtree was a keynote speaker at several anti-vaccination events targeting the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community in Brooklyn and in Rockland County during a measles epidemic fueled by low vaccination rates.[10][26] Bigtree gave an anti-vaccine speech as headline speaker at a natural health products conference in Toronto in 2018, but a repeat performance was canceled in 2019 after The Globe and Mail started asking questions.[22]
Something about GDPR
Quote:Bigtree provided fundraising assistance for the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 2024 presidential campaign in 2023. Among other activities, he participated to an online event bringing together several prominent anti-vaccination activists, such as Mikki Willis, Sayer Ji, Charles Eisenstein, Sherri Tenpenny and Joe Mercola.[51][52] Bigtree is the sole managing member of KFP Consulting LLC, a firm established in May 2023. In July, the Kennedy campaign had paid $13,500 to KFP;[53] by the end of Kennedy's campaign in 2024, that amount had reached $350,000, even though Bigtree still took in a $234,000 paycheck from ICAN in 2023.[32]
7 |
82 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-22-2025, 07:00 AM)Encia22 Wrote: Mod. Note
Please add more contents to your opening post.
New posting standards will be implemented soon, so a paragraph or two of introduction is required; especially for those who cannot watch videos.
Thank you
Thanks for the heads-up! I’ve now added two introductory paragraphs summarising the key points of the video for those who can’t/won't watch it. Appreciate the clarification and the work you’re doing to keep the sub organised.
|