DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

12,000-Year-Old Human Statue Discovered at Göbekli Tepe
#11
(09-27-2025, 07:21 AM)Kurokage Wrote: I went to a few conventions on different subjects in my youth, and am willing to admit I got caught up in a lot of the hype, but with age and all that....
I think Graham suffers from the same problem a lot of these 'self-educated' experts suffer. They form a hypothesis before understanding the issue and then mould the evidence to fit that idea or hypothesis.

Very true.

I started going to that conference when I discovered carved rocks on my property.  The native Americans were very helpful with explaining what they were.  a few of the elders told me I was living on an old ceremonial site when I explained what I was finding and showed them some of the rocks.  Rocks lined up in rows about five to eight feet apart identified the paths, and some of those rocks had been sculpted ot form images and others had mosiaced stones cemented onto them made of little rocks.  I found a bunch of rocks that had a sort of cement on them that were once glued to a flat stone.  When assembled the pieces look like a Turkey...no other stones in the loam were present.  I assembled the little pieces of rocks trying to align them to the stone but some had lost their cement, so I am not exactly sure if it was a turkey, but the native American guy who knew lots about these things said it was probably a turkey as I had figured.

My avatar on here is one of the stones.  It is made from either a bone or a fossilized bone someone found at least five hundred years ago.  It had a wood handle that fit into it, there was a plug in the marrow hole that still had wood fibers embedded in clay in the hole.  I brought it to a butcher, and he said it is similar to the marrow hole in the front leg of a cow....but way bigger.  I asked him if it could be a buffalo, but he said he did not know...he had never butchered a buffalo, just cows and pigs and the like.  But said it is doubtful it was shaped or ground from a buffalo.  I found this in the clay layer, but not sure how deep, because it was tossed in the woods when I back filled the house...I would guess about two feet deep but the clay layer is at least five feet deep here.  I made a new handle for it.  The front face has some marks under the patina, they must have used it for pounding something.  The carving seems to be some sort of animal that wraps around the handle...but not sure what it is.  Multiple people looked at it and said what it appeared to be.  They saw what they knew, some said a puppy, others said a kitten, others said a cub and one person who owned salamanders said it looked like a salamander that lost it's tail.  Funny how so many people see what they know...it taught me that people who have beliefs or knowledge about something see things in a way to fit their beliefs and knowledge they hold.  This is important as it made me look into interpretations of evidence in science more closely...people interpret things in a way to reinforce their beliefs and knowledge....a human trait.  It is probably made from a permineralized mastadon bone someone dug up long ago.  I thought about bringing it to MTU to have it checked out, but know people who had their stuff confiscated and told they were not allowed to dig there again...one of those artifacts is on display at a local university that was confiscated..but only for students to view.

If you do not agree with consensus of the time, your opinion is discounted as pseudo science or craziness by professionals in the field.  That does not mean that it is not true.  It just mean that a lot of people who were trained to believe a certain way cannot see things that do not fit their knowledge.

Everyone knows that cigarettes cause cancer, they will not accept the evidence that smoking cigarettes in most people causes specialized B and T immune cells in the body that fight cancer to increase...which kill cancer of multiple types.  Now I am not going to say that cigarettes are good for you, just that there are chemistries they call carcinogens that actually boost immune response that can help to fight cancer.  Only a small percent ...maybe five....can get cancer from cigarette smoke, but five percent is actually a lot of people in a country of three hundred odd million people.  And smoking has other bad effects on health too, so I am not saying cigarette smoking is good.  But in peer review the medical experts rejected that research which I think was done in Norway or one of those countries based on their beliefs, they did not even consider it even though the method of action was found.  Now they will not go against the consensus of the time because it might destroy their reputation....this whole paragraph is related to the rocks, lots of things not accepted by the archeologist groups are discounted because they do not fit consensus of the time.

So I decided I was not going to get my site and rocks officially verified...didn't want to pay ten grand minimum to do that and then have the government say I can't dig here anymore since it was a burial site even though the native American historians said it was a ceremonial site or special campsite where the people there liked to make things of stone.

I brought my rocks to an old mason friend of mine...cement mason who came from Italy long ago.  He told me they were just rocks, the fields in Italy are full of rocks that look like carvings.  I told him...that is where some of the best old sculptures worked with rocks in ancient times...people probably practiced grinding down stones as a hobby and to practice to make stone carvings.  He chuckled and said I was probably right, he just never even thought about it that way when he saw stuff in the fields full of tomatoes and in rock piles by orchards.  I also showed him some old dinosaur bones, and when talking to a guy at a rock show who sells slabs of polished dino bones he said he gets them from around here.  Lots of fossil bone pieces here in rock piles or sitting on side of roads.  He looked at a few stones I brought that looked like bone and said they were and said they are everywhere here, crushed up and pieces moved by glaciers scattered around everywhere.  Ants like to eat those rocks he told me.  They contain calcium and other nutrients.  The Chinese make soups out of dragon bones...think about that.  Meat of an animal can also permineralize in clay,   The shape can be there yet, but the chemicals of the meat is altered to a stone mix by the clay which elements of the clay can come from ancient life too.

I have a clay rock somewhere that looks like a fish.  There may actually be a fish inside, many cultures coated meats with clay and made a pottery coating on them to preserve them.  This was a practice before clay pots were invented, the clay actually preserves the food in it.  but then again, maybe that is just a fish platter someone carved and coated with a patina...only the creator of it knows for sure what it is.

From studying rocks I found I began studying medicine intensely after I found a stone made of clay that all sorts of weeds were sprouting out of that were not present here in my yard before.  I guess seeds stored in clay can be viable for millions of years.  The rock sprouting the seeds had a color painted on the outside it appeared.  My Indian friend who was taking saunas with the elderly  indian medicine men asked them about it...he was in training I guess...and they told him they had heard about trading clay rocks with medical plants seeds or other seeds in them.  The particular plant I was pulling out and tossing in the woods I thought was stinging nettle.  Good thing I did not use any of it.  My granddaughter took a picture of it with an app, and it was not stinging nettle...it was a very similar looking plant that was used for arrow heads by Indians that would kill the animal by poisoning it.  Kind of explains all of the stone flaked rocks buried in certain areas here made from a kind of shale that is in the hills.  A rock that was used to make arrow heads from what I learned, a little quick acting poison on it would kill a live animal on an arrow.  The plant looked a real lot like stinging Nettle, but the blob is different with the stinging part on it on the stems.

You need to know a real lot about foraging for medicines and food in the wilderness, We have lots of mushrooms here, but I buy mine from the store.  I only know morels...but beware, there are false morels too...and I know oyster mushrooms and chicken of the woods.  I'll stick to getting mushrooms from the store.
#12
(09-24-2025, 11:36 AM)Kurokage Wrote:
(09-24-2025, 11:36 AM)Kurokage Wrote: It sure does.

Gobekli tepe and it's surrounding sites are an amazing archaeological find.

Humans 12.000 years ago settled and built possibly the first real settlements/city that we know of. It's an incredible site and I tend to read or watch anything new about the site.



​​​

 


Just to reframe this a bit, Gobekli Tepe is an amazing site. But it's fake has caused other major discoveries to be missed by the public. 
 The idea that it's the first settlement is something that pops up even in otherwise decent archeology presentations.  Ohalo II is much older, and while not as impressive is the first settlement we see giving evidence of sedentary living and some early evidence of simple agriculture. Not the sustained agriculture we see much later around the Zagross mountains (which also predates Gobekli Tepe!) but points to some understanding of the concept before we get to it being actively used. 
 It's especially notable in that there are contemporary sites to Ohalo II in the region that have been discovered, but the evidence for sedentary living and all aren't seen at those. It's too much to say this site would be where it started, but it's still interesting. 
 Then you have the Natufians and other less famous hunter gatherer groups. With a mix of seasonal and sedentary settlements, some fairly large. ʿAin Mallaha for example shows early sedentism and 50 dwellings built of rough stone and wood have been identified.
  At Boncuklu Tarla we see some influence from the Natufians and large structures being built, comparable to Gobekli Tepe though not from solid stone, and roughly a thousand years earlier. 
 
  Now, Gobekli Tepe itself is part of culture referred to as the Tas Tepeler culture or civilization. Even here it's not the oldest. Karahan Tepe is generally referred to as being a couple of centuries older. While the boost from Gobekli Tepe's discovery has provided funding to identify numerous other sites that are part of the culture, some seemingly older as well. 
 I'd also push back on considering it a city. Though one of the earliest proto cities, Catalhoyuk does come from the same modern country. Catalhoyuk had a densely packed housing structure alluding to later urban developments.
#13
(12-06-2025, 11:17 AM)Runespider Wrote: Just to reframe this a bit, Gobekli Tepe is an amazing site. But it's fake has caused other major discoveries to be missed by the public. 
 The idea that it's the first settlement is something that pops up even in otherwise decent archeology presentations.  Ohalo II is much older, and while not as impressive is the first settlement we see giving evidence of sedentary living and some early evidence of simple agriculture. Not the sustained agriculture we see much later around the Zagross mountains (which also predates Gobekli Tepe!) but points to some understanding of the concept before we get to it being actively used. 
 It's especially notable in that there are contemporary sites to Ohalo II in the region that have been discovered, but the evidence for sedentary living and all aren't seen at those. It's too much to say this site would be where it started, but it's still interesting. 
 Then you have the Natufians and other less famous hunter gatherer groups. With a mix of seasonal and sedentary settlements, some fairly large. ʿAin Mallaha for example shows early sedentism and 50 dwellings built of rough stone and wood have been identified.
  At Boncuklu Tarla we see some influence from the Natufians and large structures being built, comparable to Gobekli Tepe though not from solid stone, and roughly a thousand years earlier. 
 
  Now, Gobekli Tepe itself is part of culture referred to as the Tas Tepeler culture or civilization. Even here it's not the oldest. Karahan Tepe is generally referred to as being a couple of centuries older. While the boost from Gobekli Tepe's discovery has provided funding to identify numerous other sites that are part of the culture, some seemingly older as well. 
 I'd also push back on considering it a city. Though one of the earliest proto cities, Catalhoyuk does come from the same modern country. Catalhoyuk had a densely packed housing structure alluding to later urban developments.

I did reference other sites around Gobekli Tepe in my opening quote.  Some links to your comments would be nice  Thumbup



 
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning." 
Charles Tremper
#14
(12-06-2025, 12:50 PM)Kurokage Wrote: I did reference other sites around Gobekli Tepe in my opening quote.  Some links to your comments would be nice  Thumbup


Sorry, I thought naming the sites would be enough for someone interested to look them up. 
 And yes you did, but my point was only to add that Gobekli Tepe isn't the oldest. 
 
Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran

Ohalo II: A 23,000-Year-Old Fisher-Hunter-Gatherer's Camp on the Shore of Fluctuating Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee)

Intensification and sedentism in the terminal Pleistocene Natufian sequence of el-Wad Terrace (Israel)

The Natufian site of Eynan - 'Ain Mallaha (Galilee, Israel). Excavations 1996-2005

​​​​​

A 12.000 -year-old temple was found during excavations in Boncuklu Tarla in southeastern Turkey
 
Im not super happy with this link, Arkeonews.net is great but ad heavy. Unfortunately most of the writing on the site is pay walled or in Turkish or German. 
 
TAŞ TEPELER
 
Catalhoyuk Research Project
#15
(12-06-2025, 01:48 PM)Runespider Wrote: Sorry, I thought naming the sites would be enough for someone interested to look them up. 
 And yes you did, but my point was only to add that Gobekli Tepe isn't the oldest. 
 
Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran

Ohalo II: A 23,000-Year-Old Fisher-Hunter-Gatherer's Camp on the Shore of Fluctuating Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee)

Intensification and sedentism in the terminal Pleistocene Natufian sequence of el-Wad Terrace (Israel)

The Natufian site of Eynan - 'Ain Mallaha (Galilee, Israel). Excavations 1996-2005

​​​​​

A 12.000 -year-old temple was found during excavations in Boncuklu Tarla in southeastern Turkey
 
Im not super happy with this link, Arkeonews.net is great but ad heavy. Unfortunately most of the writing on the site is pay walled or in Turkish or German. 
 
TAŞ TEPELER
 
Catalhoyuk Research Project

Thanks, some interesting reading!!

Some of them are more hunter gatherer camps rather than actual settlements, but none the less shows that it must have been a very interesting and difficult time going from hunter/gatherer to farming and settlements.



 
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning." 
Charles Tremper
#16
So, they found another game piece? From just one of the games played at the yearly harvest festival. They built the whole complex for an entertainment area. 

Can anyone dispute my interpretation of the peg board statue and building complex?

Archeology that far back is just making up explanations from remaining evidence of cultures we have no context of.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#17
(12-06-2025, 01:56 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Thanks, some interesting reading!!

Some of them are more hunter gatherer camps rather than actual settlements, but none the less shows that it must have been a very interesting and difficult time going from hunter/gatherer to farming and settlements.

 Eh? 
 The only one that applies to is Ohalo II, and as the link states: 
Quote:The food remains indicate a year-round occupation in brush huts constructed of local trees and with grass bedding on the floors.
 It states camp but in anthropology settlements refer to any site that was occupied by humans, temporary or not.
 I didn't want to link to wikipedia but can't find a single reference that consolidates the information better: 
 Ohalo II
 
 The site was occupied for generations, shows year round sedentism, and basic cultivation of plants. I'm not really sure what would be needed to make it more of a "true settlement."
#18
(09-25-2025, 10:01 AM)BeTheGoddess Wrote: Graham Handcock blocked my from his facebook page.

Possibly he will toss you some crisps and ale. I also read that some guy named Andrew needs a bunk.
#19
(12-06-2025, 03:02 PM)Runespider Wrote:  Eh? 
 The only one that applies to is Ohalo II, and as the link states: 
 It states camp but in anthropology settlements refer to any site that was occupied by humans, temporary or not.
 I didn't want to link to wikipedia but can't find a single reference that consolidates the information better: 
 Ohalo II
 
 The site was occupied for generations, shows year round sedentism, and basic cultivation of plants. I'm not really sure what would be needed to make it more of a "true settlement."

The first one is 404'ed.
The second and 4th are Hunter gather types settling down and the 5th and 6th links are from the same area as Gobekli tepe. 
The last one is around 9,000 years old, so long after Gobekli'



 
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning." 
Charles Tremper
#20
(12-07-2025, 08:11 AM)Kurokage Wrote: The first one is 404'ed.
The second and 4th are Hunter gather types settling down and the 5th and 6th links are from the same area as Gobekli tepe. 
The last one is around 9,000 years old, so long after Gobekli'

That's odd. Works fine on my phone and laptop. 
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1236743

 Yes. As they're going from nomadic to sedentary. They were at the sites a long time. I'm not sure why you don't think that makes them a settlement? 
 
 Never said it was, my original comment was that Catalhoyuk was  a early proto-city compared to Gobekli Tepe.



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hominid skulls discovered in China - OVER 1 million years old Maxmars 8 554 04-03-2026, 08:47 PM
Last Post: Harte
  "Oldest human artwork so far" in caves of Indonesia Maxmars 0 282 01-23-2026, 06:44 PM
Last Post: Maxmars
  The Halls of Amenti Have Been Discovered Under the Giza Plateau KKLoco 110 11,777 01-18-2026, 09:23 AM
Last Post: Harte
  The statue on Corvo annonentity 1 378 04-30-2025, 06:41 AM
Last Post: Solvedit
  Lost Ancient Civilisation Discovered in Ecuadorian Amazon pianopraze 1 546 03-13-2025, 12:05 PM
Last Post: sahgwa
  Tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II discovered Byrd 0 367 02-21-2025, 09:37 PM
Last Post: Byrd
  Tomb of Beermaker to the Gods discovered Byrd 4 729 02-25-2024, 01:22 PM
Last Post: Maxmars