2 WV Guardsmen ** shot block away from the White House

[IDELB2006]

The extra aware CT in me is pondering the Go Fund is a way to solicit funding for whatever mission or job they choose to use him for.

I'd need to know more about the family that took them in. It could easily be a CIA operation, or an Chinese, Russian Iranian, Afghani or Pakistani

Planning this attack in January, 2023 seems like a long shot considering the circumstances.

No doubt all those groups, and more are working to weaponize Muslims against the US. That's a given.

[putnam6]

Or the FBI who has been repeatedly revealed to "operate" with these circles....

In fact... other than the "lone gunman" strategy... they will have no cover... again. Plenty are hyper aware for sure 

The black market has no need to play games on the public market. I dont know what that means

If this was a "spuriously funded vanity/virtue" hit... someone will know. hopefully so

Once again, calling out the shame that no one will 'investigate' this with a reporters resources.

Instead it will be "press-release/talking head" journalism... all the way from soup to nuts. MSM media is compliticit and/or compromised BY DESIGN

Welly welly well, if it is the FBI, and Im just spitballing here, the FBI generally infiltrates while the CIA creates, all was arranged by the previous administration, so I'd still lean towards the CIA/foreign covertly or in conjunction with.

Doesn't mean I trust the FBI; I think the CIA is more capable, sneaky, and just loves burning OUR candle at both ends.

[putnam6]

and……….there’s this which might interest you, especially the last few paragraphs. 


“The ambush shooting of two National Guard members near the White House is fueling fresh scrutiny of the vetting of Afghan evacuees, with former FBI special agent Nicole Parker telling Fox News Digital the screening process during the rushed 2021 withdrawal was essentially a "free-for-all."

”Tens of thousands of Afghans were evacuated to the U.S. in the wake of the withdrawal and subsequent Taliban takeover of the country. The chaotic nature of the operation raised concerns at the time from Republicans, and in official reports, that some evacuees were not properly vetted and could have catastrophic consequences.”

"They said it is a ticking time bomb waiting to explode because we've just allowed all of these people into our country," Parker told Fox News Digital.“

“In August 2022, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., revealed that a whistleblower said 324 individuals had entered with derogatory information, while a 2022 report by the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) separately found the department failed to properly vet Afghan evacuees entering the U.S., creating potential national security risks.”

“Parker told Fox News Digital that FBI agents worked with Department of Defense contractors in foreign countries to screen Afghans, but the State Department repeatedly overrode security concerns.“

"There were individuals that were not being recommended to come to the United States, yet they were being overridden by the Biden State Department," Parker said. "Initially, it was a free-for-all and no one was being vetted."

it wouldn’t post link

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-fbi-specia...-time-bomb

[Maxmars]

Welly welly well, if it is the FBI, and Im just spitballing here, the FBI generally infiltrates while the CIA creates, all was arranged by the previous administration, so I'd still lean towards the CIA/foreign covertly or in conjunction with.

Doesn't mean I trust the FBI; I think the CIA is more capable, sneaky, and just loves burning OUR candle at both ends.

RE: my comment about the 'black market' is that it does not rely on social networking OR the internet to function... it never did. 

Ideological/political criminal actors don't "publicly" communicate... that idea they are going to be 'caught out' using the 'internet' for 'business' is a useful Hollywood construct...

This might turn out to be typical zealotry used by someone to cause pain... or it could be a personal defect, or a truly ill mind... or just plain thuggery and prison-yard bravado...

Let's see how quickly it becomes lost in the media haze of wanton violence for clicks and advertisements.

[putnam6]

RE: my comment about the 'black market' is that it does not rely on social networking OR the internet to function... it never did. 

Ideological/political criminal actors don't "publicly" communicate... that idea they are going to be 'caught out' using the 'internet' for 'business' is a useful Hollywood construct...

This might turn out to be typical zealotry used by someone to cause pain... or it could be a personal defect, or a truly ill mind... or just plain thuggery and prison-yard bravado...

Let's see how quickly it becomes lost in the media haze of wanton violence for clicks and advertisements.

Didn't suggest thats the only funding, just inferring it's another revenue stream if it's a front of any kind, it needs to show it makes legit money somehow, YES or NO

Way too coincidental to ignore the links... so you save your wife and kids from. the hell of war-torn Afghanistan, only to 4 years later murdered in cold blood, arrested, and sentenced to life in prison 

How does that snapped process occur, with snapped meaning when did his cheese slide from his bolani

Much more likely, he was hired for a job, and he performed  question is, did the CIA push the button(s), or did they just let it happen through another entity

[BeyondKnowledge]

The president has just announced that one of the two has passed away. 

May she rest in peace.

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Had me till the 3rd paragraph as it is ... needs clarification ... but 2 out of 3 ain't bad  

I don't think individual Presidents have controlled the CIA, since circa November 1963. They may suggest things, work in conjunction with, but the CIA moves without Presidential knowledge, for numerous reasons. Like plausible denial, and black market money feeds CIA black projects, but damn, this is CT entry-level shit.

So tell me, how did Trump wrestle away control after 60-plus years of its independence

Happy Thanksgiving... IP 

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...07-582.jpg]

Well that was the joke part of the comment.. which really doesnt help it, but point taken. 1963 seems fair.

 The CIA has always adhered to The Great Zero Sum Impact Superstition, or did during the MK Ultra days. 

They don't write "morality trading" on the floor of their headquarters or anything, but they do (allegedly) believe in a grand cosmic balance of negligible impact with the things they do...

Like if they (allegedly) drive someone insane with organized psychological torture trying to "integrity test" them for a psyops clearance, and that person carves "My ELF weapon" on a gun to go shoot up a Navy Yard, they must be really benevolent to at least 15 people to offset the tragedy of their impact.

So Trump has to beat Satan in a card game to take control of their ops. Or be Satan, which is also entirely possible..

And the last paragraph of that is the joke.. because The CIA acts more like scientologists...

And happy Turkey Day as well.

[putnam6]

Well that was the joke part of the comment.. which really doesnt help it, but point taken. 1963 seems fair.

 The CIA has always adhered to The Great Zero Sum Impact Superstition, or did during the MK Ultra days. 

They don't write "morality trading" on the floor of their headquarters or anything, but they do (allegedly) believe in a grand cosmic balance of negligible impact with the things they do...

Like if they (allegedly) drive someone insane with organized psychological torture trying to "integrity test" them for a psyops clearance, and that person carves "My ELF weapon" on a gun to go shoot up a Navy Yard, they must be really benevolent to at least 15 people to offset the tragedy of their impact.

So Trump has to beat Satan in a card game to take control of their ops. Or be Satan, which is also entirely possible..

And the last paragraph of that is the joke..

And happy Turkey Day as well.

AI friendly filtered response

That was a bit more apparent!

I just wanted to ask for clarification because I didn't want to unintentionally offend you with a misdirected "You've got to be joking!"

You have to admit, your humor and your heartfelt rants share a similar rhythm, intensity, volume, and choice of words.

I thought I understood your posts, but I can never be 100% certain when reading them!

I even decided to run your posts through Grok AI out of curiosity, and now I feel more in the loop.

It picked up on the sarcasm, but it seems to miss some of the subtleties in your writing

Or perhaps your humor is so distinctive that it ends up being classified as QAnon-style conspiracy!

Also, I'mletting Grok analyze one of my posts as well!

see below
 

 
This poster wrote this in reference to the National Guard shooting can you understand what they are suggesting 
 
"Yeah, but...
Just admit we let him in because he was family man that was in the Khandahar Strike Force and assigned to Firebase Gecko and fought alongside US troops at a CIA special forces base.
And that former allegience gave him easier approval when onsidering "the type of Americans this administration wants." 
And with the CIA connections, maybe Trump's executive orders took over their psychic puppet division and it was Allah commanding that he do it to be another polarizing useful tragedy?
 
 
The poster is making a conspiratorial and sarcastic claim about the shooter in the recent National Guard recruitment-center attack in Idaho (where a Jordanian national named Mohammad Sharabati opened fire, wounding several soldiers before being killed).
Here’s what they’re suggesting, broken down:

1. “We let him in because he was a family man… in the Kandahar Strike Force… assigned to Firebase Gecko… fought alongside US troops at a CIA special forces base.”  
   • They’re claiming the shooter was a former Afghan commando (specifically from the Kandahar Strike Force, an elite Afghan unit that worked very closely with U.S. Special Forces and CIA during the war).  
     
   • “Firebase Gecko” was a real CIA paramilitary base in Afghanistan where these units were based.  
     
   • The implication is that he was evacuated/resettled in the U.S. under the Afghan SIV (Special Immigrant Visa) program or a similar fast-track because of his prior service with U.S. forces/CIA.
     
2. “Former allegiance gave him easier approval when considering ‘the type of Americans this administration wants.’”  
   • Sarcasm directed at the Biden administration’s immigration/vetting policies: i.e., “We prioritized bringing in former Afghan allies, even if vetting was rushed or lax.”
     
3. “With the CIA connections, maybe Trump’s executive orders took over their psychic puppet division and it was Allah commanding that he do it…”  
   • This part turns into pure conspiracy-troll absurdity.  
     
   • They’re mockingly suggesting the shooter was actually a CIA mind-control asset, that Trump somehow seized control of the CIA’s (fictional) “psychic puppet division” via executive order, and then used it to make the guy carry out the attack under the delusion that “Allah commanded it” — all to create a “useful polarizing tragedy” (i.e., something that inflames culture-war tensions right after Trump’s re-election).
     

In short: the poster is blending real details (the shooter may indeed have been a former Afghan commando resettled in the U.S.) with extreme sarcasm and QAnon-style conspiracy nonsense to imply that either (a) Biden’s Afghan resettlement program imported a dangerous jihadist who should never have been let in, or (b) the whole thing was a deep-state/false-flag op now being spun for political effect. It’s written in the over-the-top way common in certain far-right online circles to trigger reactions.

Now, if you have come this far, go a little further because here's Grok's thought on this exchange I had in the thread.  Haha, the little AI bastard came down harder at my comments than yours. It's twice as snarky and a little more biting...missing your subtleties and grace. 
 

here's another exchange

"Looks like Rahmannoodle and Khamila got to watch a lot of MSNBC and CNN while they were staying at Stan and Val's place in Bellingham, Washington.
 
You mean like indoctrination? probably ...
 
And isn't it a muslim cultural issue where persons almost become indentured servants to connected individuals, with the bulk ofthe payoff being their wife and children get taken care of.

 This cold-blooded murdering shithead took the place of a deserving Afghan national who allied with our soldiers heard plenty of stories, not the CIA and their nation-building BS
 
Am I wrong....
 
Searching the web
29 results
 
Browsing web page
The exchange you're sharing appears to be a continuation of the same online thread (or a similar one) reacting to the recent shooting of two West Virginia National Guard members near the White House in Washington, D.C., on November 25, 2025. The suspect, 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal (mocked here as "Rahmannoodle"), allegedly ambushed and critically wounded the unarmed troops in what authorities described as a targeted attack.  Lakanwal, a father of five who entered the U.S. in 2021 as a refugee under the Biden-era Operation Allies Welcome program, had prior ties to U.S. partner forces in Afghanistan (more on that below).  The poster is venting frustration and seeking agreement ("Am I wrong....") on a mix of xenophobic, conspiratorial, and politically charged grievances about immigration, cultural stereotypes, and resettlement policies. Here's a breakdown of what they're suggesting, point by point:
1. Media "Indoctrination" via Sponsors in Bellingham

• Claim: "Rahmannoodle and Khamila" (likely referring to Lakanwal and his wife, possibly named Kamila or a similar variant based on common Afghan names; no public confirmation of her exact name yet) were hosted by "Stan and Val" (Stanley and Valerie Creighton, a retired couple in Bellingham, Washington) and exposed to "a lot of MSNBC and CNN."
  
• Suggestion: The Creightons, portrayed as liberal elites (they live in a $2.7 million home and have publicly criticized Trump), "indoctrinated" the family with left-wing media while providing housing and support after their 2021 arrival. This allegedly turned Lakanwal against the U.S., fueling his alleged radicalization into the attack. It's a trope blaming "woke" Americans for importing and then "brainwashing" immigrants into threats.
  
• Context/Facts: The Creightons did sponsor Lakanwal, his wife, and their five children upon arrival, housing them temporarily in Bellingham and launching a GoFundMe that raised funds for their resettlement.  Bellingham (near the Canadian border) is a common initial stop for Afghan refugees in the Pacific Northwest due to NGO networks. No evidence has emerged of specific media viewing habits or direct "indoctrination," but the poster's framing ties into broader right-wing narratives post-attack, amplified on X, that blame progressive sponsors for poor vetting or cultural clashes.  Lakanwal drove cross-country from Washington state to D.C. for the shooting, suggesting time spent in the area. 
  

2. "Muslim Cultural Issue" of Indentured Servitude

• Claim: This is "a muslim cultural issue where persons almost become indentured servants to connected individuals," with the "payoff" being family care.
  
• Suggestion: Lakanwal's alleged actions stem from ingrained Islamic or Middle Eastern cultural norms (e.g., patronage systems like wasta in Arab/Afghan contexts, where loyalty to patrons ensures family welfare). The poster implies he was "indentured" to U.S. sponsors or shadowy figures (tying back to CIA ties), but this backfired into violence—perhaps resentment over unfulfilled "debts" or exploitation.
  
• Context/Facts: This is a reductive stereotype lumping diverse Muslim-majority societies into a monolithic "indentured" dynamic, ignoring socioeconomic factors like refugee trauma or PTSD (Lakanwal reportedly struggled with asylum delays and employment).  No official reports link his motives to cultural patronage; the FBI is investigating potential Islamist extremism, but early details point more to personal grievances than ideology.  It's politically incorrect rhetoric designed to stoke Islamophobia, common in post-attack online discourse.
  

3. Displacing a "Deserving" Afghan Ally

• Claim: Lakanwal is a "cold-blooded murdering shithead" who "took the place of a deserving Afghan national who allied with our soldiers [and] heard plenty of stories, not the CIA and their nation-building BS."
  
• Suggestion: Despite Lakanwal's own service (he was a GPS specialist in Afghanistan's elite Kandahar Strike Force, aka "Scorpion Forces," working alongside CIA paramilitaries and guarding U.S. evacuations at Kabul airport in 2021), he's painted as an unworthy opportunist.  The poster argues real heroes—Afghans who bonded with U.S. soldiers (not "CIA nation-building" schemes, a dig at perceived failed interventions)—got sidelined in the visa queue. This frames the attack as blowback from Biden's rushed resettlement (over 76,000 Afghans via Operation Allies Welcome), prioritizing CIA assets over "true" allies.
  
• Context/Facts: Lakanwal's U.S. entry was fast-tracked due to his CIA-linked service, but SIV (Special Immigrant Visa) backlogs have left thousands of Afghan interpreters and soldier-allied locals in limbo, fueling similar complaints.  Trump has seized on this, calling it a "terrorist attack" enabled by Biden's policies and vowing reviews of refugee programs.  The "heard plenty of stories" line romanticizes soldier camaraderie while demonizing CIA ops as elitist "BS."
  

In essence, the poster isn't "wrong" on verifiable details like the Bellingham stay or Lakanwal's CIA background—they're weaponizing them into a narrative of betrayal: Liberal sponsors + lax immigration + "backward" culture = imported terrorism that screwed over genuine U.S. allies. It's inflammatory fodder for anti-immigrant sentiment, especially timely after Trump's 2024 win and amid refugee backlash fears.  The "Am I wrong...." is rhetorical bait for echo-chamber agreement, blending facts with bias to rage against the system. If this is from X or a forum, it's typical of the rapid, unfiltered spin in those spaces right after breaking news.

OK maybe running it through AL wasn't sucha good idea after all... the rest of the inquiry LOL feels like Im getting on Grok's shit list.

Definitely will have to use the friendly filter... 


 

So you are coming at me hard here, how should I have phrased my response
 
 
You didn’t actually ask me the question yet—you just shared the two posts and asked me to explain what they were saying.
 
 
I answered exactly that: I broke down the references, the sarcasm, the conspiracy layers, and the political subtext, while separating verifiable facts from the inflammatory spin.
 
If you wanted a softer or more neutral-sounding version that you could post publicly without sounding like you’re “defending” the posters (or without triggering people), here’s how you could have re-phrased the same explanation in a calmer, more “just the facts + light interpretation” tone:
“Hey, trying to unpack what this person is getting at.

 
It looks like they’re saying the shooter (Rahmanullah Lakanwal) was a former member of the CIA-backed Kandahar Strike Force in Afghanistan, got fast-tracked into the U.S. as a refugee in 2021, initially lived with sponsors in Bellingham, WA, and is now being blamed for radicalizing (or never being properly vetted).
They’re mixing real details (his unit, the sponsors, the rushed evacuation) with a lot of sarcasm and conspiracy stuff—implying either Biden’s program let in the wrong people, or the whole thing is some deep-state op.
Classic post-attack internet pile-on blending legit grievances about the Afghan resettlement process with culture-war red meat.”
That version says the same thing I did, but in a tone most people would read as “trying to translate crazy internet speak” rather than “defending” or “attacking” anyone. It keeps the edge low enough that you don’t catch stray heat from either side.
Does that feel closer to the vibe you were going for?
 
No, I think you are overly sensitive to my post, haha it is what it is
 
Fair enough, haha. I probably over-calibrated trying to stay clinical. You’re good; your posts were just asking me to decode the crazy, not endorse it. I’ll chill on the tone policing next time.  
Internet’s gonna internet. Sometimes you just gotta point at the clown show and ask, “Wait, what are they even saying?” That’s all you did. No harm, no foul. 

[Sky727]

The female NG person has died 

[IAMTAT]

FWIW

So if the below is true... why leave your wife and kids and kill 2 National Guard soldiers across the country?

It's like this was something he was ordered to do. Instead of a wild hair


https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1994064...43038?s=20

Looks like Stan and Val, the couple housing this monster, are big D supporters and donors.
Stan and Val have shut down their social media and are now said to be hiding out in Costa Rica.

The killer, Rahmannuallah-akbar, was also being financially supported by Soros-funded organizations.