DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

10 Tips To Spot 'Disinfo'.
#1
Following on from Cass Sunstein's plans to plant gov internet shills on 'conspiracy' forums to gatekeep factual knowledge and create digital 'pseudo-environments' (also engage in 'forum sliding'; 'consensus cracking' and 'topic dilution')..


and considering the fact that the Pentagon now spends more money on 'domestic' psyops than 'foreign' psyops and that.taxpayer funded gov loser internet trolls are now in active open play online..


And considering the fact that.now only a handful of private groups control the output of virtually all mainstream 'media' (which is now only trusted by about 30% of the people)..


Thought this was a pretty excellent and much needed video presenting some top tips to watch out for when confronted with 'disinfo' and general gov sponsored bullshit.






Cheers.
#2
'pseudo-environments' (also engage in 'forum sliding'; 'consensus cracking' and 'topic dilution').

instructions not clear, are there any examples?
#3
(10-07-2025, 08:05 AM)Sirius Wrote: 'pseudo-environments' (also engage in 'forum sliding'; 'consensus cracking' and 'topic dilution').

instructions not clear, are there any examples?

Look around! For an example of (ahem) righteous debate, see how I'm currently having fun pointing out the hypocrisy of conservatives who want States to be forced to heed federal immigration law but don't want States to be forced to heed federal drug law, and are perfectly fine with allowing drug cartels to open storefronts as long as they're called "dispensaries" and offer a product they want.

Of course that is not a cynical rhetorical tactic, being motivated by principle and respect for the rule of law.

Although sometimes it looks the same, if you want it to. It's very easy to dismiss things you don't want to hear as "disinfo".
#4
(10-07-2025, 08:21 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Look around! For an example of (ahem) righteous debate, see how I'm currently having fun pointing out the hypocrisy of conservatives who want States to be forced to heed federal immigration law but don't want States to be forced to heed federal drug law, and are perfectly fine with allowing drug cartels to open storefronts as long as they're called "dispensaries" and offer a product they want.

Of course that is not a cynical rhetorical tactic, being motivated by principle and respect for the rule of law.

Although sometimes it looks the same, if you want it to. It's very easy to dismiss things you don't want to hear as "disinfo".

lol the "dispensaries" they all have security certificates they have to display, usually pops up on a wall a week or two after opening
#5
(10-07-2025, 08:29 AM)Sirius Wrote: lol the "dispensaries" they all have security certificates they have to display, usually pops up on a wall a week or two after opening

Gotta show that "The Man" is getting his taste.
#6
(10-07-2025, 08:32 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Gotta show that "The Man" is getting his taste.

everything is blatant, nobody does anything  Puzzled personally I blame paracetamol. I think that's what got Isaac Asimov, somehow I missed he was a globalist atheist before. From his books you would assume he was into all sorts of weird esoteric shit, but no "globalist atheist". I didn't even know that was a thing, I thought they all worshiped Baphomet or something. It's been a confusing day so far
#7
(10-07-2025, 08:05 AM)Sirius Wrote: instructions not clear, are there any examples?

Check out the Charlie Kirk thread:

Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah

What is going on when the debate about this assassination is all about on my side of political beliefs? The psyop is deep to show ones political colors.
#8
(10-07-2025, 08:55 AM)Kwaka Wrote: The psyop is deep to show ones political colors.

Unless you're a National Socialist. They're out in force.
#9
(10-07-2025, 08:21 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Look around! For an example of (ahem) righteous debate, see how I'm currently having fun pointing out the hypocrisy of conservatives who want States to be forced to heed federal immigration law but don't want States to be forced to heed federal drug law, and are perfectly fine with allowing drug cartels to open storefronts as long as they're called "dispensaries" and offer a product they want.

Of course that is not a cynical rhetorical tactic, being motivated by principle and respect for the rule of law.

Although sometimes it looks the same, if you want it to. It's very easy to dismiss things you don't want to hear as "disinfo".


Im far from a drug enthusiast *unless its LSD* but the cartel told me to ask you if you have evidence to back up this claim :p
#10
(10-07-2025, 09:35 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: Im far from a drug enthusiast *unless its LSD* but the cartel told me to ask you if you have evidence to back up this claim :p

I will search my High Times archive for an authoritative source that is acceptable to you.

Smile