DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

The Town Elon Musk Is Poisoning
#1
Here's a video about Elon Musk poisoning Memphis tennesee that most people don't know about. watching the video will explain it much better than I can so here you go. Very iteresting as I never even heard of this happening.


It’s like buying a fire extinguisher that says, “This blaze looks serious… unlock full suppression mode for just $11.99/month!”
#2
(08-03-2025, 08:48 AM)baddmove Wrote: Here's a video about Elon Musk poisoning Memphis tennesee that most people don't know about. watching the video will explain it much better than I can so here you go. Very iteresting as I never even heard of this happening.

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VJT2JeDCyw]

I think China is on the right track.

They are beginning to bury some of their data centers and servers at sea.

And letting the ocean do the job of cooling.

Which is potentially a lot more eco-friendly.

And seemingly a smart direction, if managed carefully.

Microsoft did it first with its "Project Natick" but they did not think it was practical for large-scale deployment.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#3
I doubt it is just Elon causing problems with the AI race currently going on. Is it getting close to the time to dust of some of those shelved patients that have been considered too disruptive to the energy industry?

While the economy is getting an upgrade with the genius act, Upgrade the energy at the same time?
#4
(08-03-2025, 08:48 AM)baddmove Wrote: Here's a video about Elon Musk poisoning Memphis tennesee that most people don't know about. watching the video will explain it much better than I can so here you go. Very iteresting as I never even heard of this happening.

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VJT2JeDCyw]

No good will come from the elite, or AI. And if any does, it won't offset the damage they do. In another forum someone pointed out how science has made birth rates higher. I said as long we thanking science for its deeds. Lets also thank it for nuclear weapons, nuclear waste, plastic and so on.

I just wonder, is it evil people that get rich, or does becoming rich make you evil.
#5
(08-03-2025, 10:21 AM)Unknownparadox Wrote: No good will come from the elite, or AI. And if any does, it won't offset the damage they do. In another forum someone pointed out how science has made birth rates higher. I said as long we thanking science for its deeds. Lets also thank it for nuclear weapons, nuclear waste, plastic and so on.

I just wonder, is it evil people that get rich, or does becoming rich make you evil.

Meanwhile in Kentucky Peter Thiel will be in charge of the first in history private company to enrich uranium.
Billionaire Peter Thiel backing first privately developed US uranium enrichment facility in Paducah

And also Kentucky, Kentucky AG, LG&E agree to keep coal plant operating for future data centers

All for powering Data Centers and AI. AI wins, humans die.

Let's not forget Crypto Currency. 
Quote:LATEST RESEARCH: “Artificial intelligence: Supply chain constraints and energy implications” (May 2025); AI could consume more power than Bitcoin by the end of 2025.
...
Did you know Bitcoin runs on an energy-intensive network?Ever since its inception Bitcoin’s trust-minimizing consensus has been enabled by its proof-of-work algorithm. The machines performing the “work” are consuming huge amounts of energy while doing so. Moreover, the energy used is primarily sourced from fossil fuels. The Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index was created to provide insight into these amounts, and raise awareness on the unsustainability of the proof-of-work algorithm.
 
Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index
There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people. - Commander William Adama
#6
I mentioned in the anti AI thread that data centers currently consumes 1.5% of the entire planet Earth electrical production. Of this 60% is produced by fossil fuels. That means almost 1% of the entire planets carbon output from fossil fuels is for current internet storage and AI. And it is only increasing.

Where are the global warming  protesters?

Edit: I found the video for the power consumption and pollution.


I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#7
(08-03-2025, 07:18 PM)Bootless Wrote: [Video: https://denyignorance.com/newreply.php?t...lyto=62940]
Meanwhile in Kentucky Peter Thiel will be in charge of the first in history private company to enrich uranium.
Billionaire Peter Thiel backing first privately developed US uranium enrichment facility in Paducah

And also Kentucky, Kentucky AG, LG&E agree to keep coal plant operating for future data centers

All for powering Data Centers and AI. AI wins, humans die.

Let's not forget Crypto Currency. 

And to top that off they are burning trees for power to help power those energy hogs. Claiming it is carbon neutral. It might be carbon neutral in hundred years. Minus all the fossil fuels used to cut it, transport it and burn it. To be fair sometimes they use plastic and other garbage to burn the trees.

Even if you don't believe CO2 is warming the planet. Burning trees for power does not seem like a good idea. What happens when there is no more trees?

Here is excellent video from Micheal Moore, Planet of the humans. It's worth a watch if you care about the revolution in energy and the planet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE
#8
We are humans... we act without foresight, we take until it's gone... and then whine like a child.

Massive cooling apparatus ...

While I can imagine these geniuses must certainly have looked into this...

Does anyone know what happens to the regional ecosystem when the waters' temperature is 'adjusted up' this way?  Or do we not care because... hell, it's a big ocean, lake, river... whatever... besides we're going to Mars.
#9
(08-03-2025, 08:38 PM)Maxmars Wrote: We are humans... we act without foresight, we take until it's gone... and then whine like a child.

Massive cooling apparatus ...

While I can imagine these geniuses must certainly have looked into this...

Does anyone know what happens to the regional ecosystem when the waters' temperature is 'adjusted up' this way?  Or do we not care because... hell, it's a big ocean, lake, river... whatever... besides we're going to Mars.

The problem is that Musk initially aimed for a 2025 timeframe regarding going to Mars, and yet here we are....................

Probably best to stick to going back to the moon.

As to the regional ecosystems, there might be slight warming near the servers, potentially effecting local marine life if scaled up massively.

But placing the farms deeper would reduce localised warming effects more effectively.

The problem being higher pressure, increased costs, and maintenance difficulties.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
#10
(08-04-2025, 04:55 AM)andy06shake Wrote: The problem is that Musk initially aimed for a 2025 timeframe regarding going to Mars, and yet here we are....................

Probably best to stick to going back to the moon.

As to the regional ecosystems, there might be slight warming near the servers, potentially effecting local marine life if scaled up massively.

But placing the farms deeper would reduce localised warming effects more effectively.

The problem being higher pressure, increased costs, and maintenance difficulties.

You are saying that forcing the mineral rich, oxygen poor, deep seawater to the surface by thermal upwelling is not going to adversely affect the ecosystem? Colder water usually has more oxygen but not in the deep areas. This could actually suffocate the surface life in the water.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?