09-03-2025, 07:41 PM
(09-03-2025, 06:35 PM)Hanslune Wrote: LOL Address the images from within the rings......I did. I'll make it easier for you - one cannot date structure from images. So what are the C-14 dates from those structures? Thermoluminescence dating of pottery? O Hydration dating on obsidian tools? Rehydroxylation? Etc., etc., can you show real evidence, not your opinion that these date to circa 9360 BCE? Have you read what Plato wrote? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...3724002111
So, you see them, hooray. What part of "Mauritania refuses to allow in depth scientific examination of the area", did you miss? The sites are guarded by the military, and why the CIA flew over to examine the Rings.
The one site I found that actually was investigated came back with a 5500bc date, which is interesting because that's the same date for the end of the African Humid Period.
This one is of some buildings on what would have been a island when the Wadi was wet. And that had to be before 5500bc. So yes, some sites can have a cursory date applied. Its just basic logic.
![[Image: z335MvQ.png]](https://i.imgur.com/z335MvQ.png)
This one is just south of the Rings. It had a quick inspection and was proclaimed "Ancient". That's all that was allowed.
![[Image: ReghmWZ.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ReghmWZ.png)
Not far from the first image is what appears to be a boat dock. Again, not something that would be useful in a dry wadi and would logically come from the African Humid Period.
![[Image: rx39wZf.png]](https://i.imgur.com/rx39wZf.png)
I am not going to apply any firm dates because of the Lunar and Solar dating systems. No one can say which one was being used... Besides, nothing says there could not of been more than one destruction, or flood.
A Lie will last for a time, but the Truth, shall last for ever...



