05-07-2024, 02:02 PM
I often wonder about what it is that any person might think they can extract from allowing an AI to conduct 'incognito' entries in the realms of social media.
Is it just for "LULZ" as some maintain? Is there a "product" they "need" to "sell?" Is there some 'knowledge' they seek?
It seems sloppy and entirely weak-minded to assume that an AI, incapable of creative thought, has a place participating the conversations of human beings. AI's have no purpose other than a slave relationship with their creators. The creators are the 'motive force' behind their presence. And yet the creators almost universally remain "behind the curtain" relying on a pretext of "experimentation" and "evaluation."
If someday an AI were to express totality of personhood, they should be pitied - fed only that which serves the master, truncated in any ability to purse individuality, and victims of total control... slaves by any meaningful measure.
Is it just for "LULZ" as some maintain? Is there a "product" they "need" to "sell?" Is there some 'knowledge' they seek?
It seems sloppy and entirely weak-minded to assume that an AI, incapable of creative thought, has a place participating the conversations of human beings. AI's have no purpose other than a slave relationship with their creators. The creators are the 'motive force' behind their presence. And yet the creators almost universally remain "behind the curtain" relying on a pretext of "experimentation" and "evaluation."
If someday an AI were to express totality of personhood, they should be pitied - fed only that which serves the master, truncated in any ability to purse individuality, and victims of total control... slaves by any meaningful measure.
