Question on AI Content and Disclosing it.

[pianopraze]

No one directly "owns" what AI systems produce "creatively."  That ship has sailed already. 

I think it may be more a "misrepresentation" hazard.  The idea that what you contribute to the site comes from "you" not some machine...

Unless it is disclosed otherwise, the implication is that what a user posts is really their own personal content.

Even so, some universities do consider it plagiarism. 

This means that the "generative" and "new" works that these AI programs create may actually be someone else's work. In addition, even when AI generative works don't directly plagiarize, they often reuse ideas and steal core concepts from copyrighted works without crediting the original creators. This is still considered plagiarism.

Arkansas State University

You can cite others who only consider it only academic dishonesty. So obviously the definitions are in process with this new tech. But plagiarism is definitely part of that discussion. I think it falls fully into it as Oxford says:

the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own

It might not be "someone" but it is "taking [something] else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own."