Question on AI Content and Disclosing it.

[Maxmars]

This came up this week at ATS and no one knew what to do.   A new poster came on and posted about 35 times.  Each of his posts was obviously not written by a human and KENZO did a check and discovered it was all AI material.

If someone is posting content that is not their own authorship, should they have to disclose it?  Or can they post AI generated walls of text and claim it as their own and not reveal that they aren't the real authors?

Members, which is to mean DI community members, enjoy the freedom and confidence that comes with communicating with others here, where we gather.  It is an honesty thing.  For some that notion may be lost... as social media has become less 'community-nurturing' and more 'theater-forward."  It's a trend that will pass...

If you (or anyone) feels an AI-infused production deserves a look, and or want to discuss it, you are more than welcome.

However, of course, if you present it without contextual disclosure... you are not being honest.  We are not psychic here, and I feel that all with whom you might communicate are not here to be 'experimented upon' or 'socially engineered.'  This is the wrong venue for that... leave it to those "others" who find something profitable or 'funny' to do so.

A huge thanks to Kenzo, although I am no longer an ATS member, I appreciate the conscientiousness and favor he did for those less able to discern the practice casually.

I really hate most of the AI 'content' I have reviewed. 
It's a personal thing. 
I would explain, but I feel this thread needn't suffer my 'thread drifting.'