07-16-2025, 12:20 PM
(07-16-2025, 11:56 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: I didnt mean trump grabbed his pipe said "the game is afoot" and investigated it, im saying he was presented evidence by the people who did *fbi* and told u about it.
I already said prince Andrew faced no criminal charges he was allowed to settle outside of court. Which is nuts but if the only evidence is witness and victim testimony it makes sense how he was able to do that doesnt it. No victim coming forward the charges would have to be dropped because theres no case here without it.
I agree completely with the pass the buck trump is doing with it but as I said before damned if he does and damned if he dont
Not releasing sealed evidence doesnt ALWAYS mean theres something evil to hide, sometimes things are classified for a reason like national security or because it details how our intelligence community operates and if we give it away it will be easier to exploit the system which is more likely the reason the house voted against it
LoL
More like Inspector Clouseau.
While national security can justify classification, not all sealed evidence poses such risks.
Oversight bodies review redactions and prevent misuse.
Transparency and security aren't always mutually exclusive.
Balance is essentially the ticket.
Well, it is if public trust is the desired result.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
