03-30-2024, 07:25 PM
This post was last modified 03-30-2024, 07:27 PM by Maxmars.
Edit Reason: Edit to add Updated info
I have an impulse to comment on your list...
• COVID came from a lab
While the mainstream remains reticent to even seriously address this "theory," they have simultaneously definitively demonstrated that being commercially beholden (addicted) to pharmaceutical advertising money makes them unreasonable to trust (even if they were remotely trusted to begin with.) The government's over-the-top nosedive into social engineering and information control also scoured away any 'trustworthiness' they may have had.
The well-documented history of research into adapting existing non-human viruses kind of spoils their defense of "It's racist to say so!" and "No good scientist would ever do that!" The Wuhan lab has a terrible track record when it comes to 'protocols and safety (look it up.) Add to this the in-your-face line, oft repeated and even offered up as evidentiary testimony "It wasn't 'gain of function research!" and you have to start wondering how they ever thought they could just 'talk their way out of it."
• Ivermectin worked
Apparently, it did. But could you imagine the angst and grief the accountants would have suffered if they 'lost' out on profit? No cheap, easily available, pharmaceutically proved and tested therapy for us... experimental MRNA manipulation ho! More 'product sales' means more profit... mandate that sucker!
• Masks offered no benefit and were harmful
That's not really fair. Masks do have a benefit... just not outside of surgery and hospital infectious disease wards. Most doctors knew this from the get go. Unless you are willing to exchange your used mask for a new one every half hour, and avoid contagion areas, and never - ever - wear one when you're sick... it is all an exercise in futility. Masks were never the blessing they were sold to be... except for investors in the industry. (That and hand sanitizer.)
• Should have never kept kids out of school
True. Children were never a viable vector for this disease. Between the robust nature of their immune responses, and the generally minimized symptoms... we should have allowed what worked for every single other flu to happen again. Shutting down the social lives of children, and subjecting them to 'tele-teaching' was a mistake of huge proportions.
• Natural immunity is better than vaccinated immunity
Up until COVID, vaccines worked to engender the development of "natural" immunity. Now that the definition of 'vaccine' has been changed to include MRNA treatment that is no longer true. Since 'appearances' now matter more than reality... natural immunity is anti-marketing...and thus hate speech.
• Long COVID is often a symptom of long vax
There are many instances of diseases that have manifested in "long lasting" form. That COVID is like that is simply the way of the human body responding to it. The jury is still out regarding post COVID-vaccine effects, and that is largely because technically the COVID "vaccine" is new technology - it is called a vaccine so it could take advantage of existing regulatory frameworks. The fact that they rushed to "change" the definition of the term "Vaccine" says it all.
• Hospitals murdered COVID patients
Again, somewhat unfair. By that same reasoning every hospital 'murders' many people due to their ignorance, worship of "policy," and reliance on "insurance banks" to validate treatment. I have to agree that automatic "intubation" seemed like a practice they should shamed for. Casual intubation is often a precursor to "giving up" on the patient.
• COVID fatality rate and death count were highly inflated
Another reason that the public lost faith in "medical authorities"... some level of collusion was not only present but led to hospitals being "compensated" for identifying COVID cases... and miraculously influenza was rendered extinct once the frenzy of COVID cases reporting was manufactured. But they didn't even flinch at the chance to earn some loyalty dollars.
• Unvaccinated were scapegoated for the failure of the shots
I saw some evidence of the idea that if there was still COVID in the world, it was because people refused the experimental 'vaccine.' But it soon fell apart when they were forced to admit it neither prevented the disease, nor stopped its transmission... so authorities opted for the appearance that they had "saved millions" and rendered the disease a tolerable malady... like it wasn't already.
• Early treatment was suppressed to make way for a “vaccine”
The focus on "vaccine, vaccine, vaccine" was another "in your face" technique used to manufacture an idea that it was the "only way" to 'save us all.' Anything that promised hope beyond that was automatically targeted for attack by the media and the government. Proof of the theory that "money talks."
• Risks of the jab were intentionally hidden from the public
It was easy to ignore the 'risks' because it was an 'emergency' and was an 'experimental' solution. I can only pray that it wasn't as damaging to every recipient as was feared. "Intentionally" is easy to justify when you live by the rule that "the experts" have spoken... (and by experts I mean the appointees and pharma spokespersons who had apparently been elevated into sainthood.
• Vaccine mandates are wrong
I'm not so sure this is a statement that is true at face value. It may be that vaccines are a good thing. "Experimental" treatments shoe-horned into the 'vaccine' designation not so much. But time will tell.
• More shots = more risk of infection
I hadn't heard this assertion before. I hope it's not so, but I wouldn't be surprised if it proves that despite the "doesn't stop the infection, doesn't stop the spread, and only helps when you get it" thing isn't actually a distraction from a depopulation agenda. COVID is a very bad flu. It is most dangerous if your weak, or weakened by other conditions... whether it makes you more likely to suffer the illness itself needs to be proven clinically... has it?
• COVID shots are neither safe nor effective
I characterize the "safe and effective" trope as a cruel joke... it's more like "sudden and unexpected."
There... impulse satisfied...
While I am not a celebrity follower, Mahers comments are mostly on the mark... although I can't say that I agree with everything he said.
• COVID came from a lab
While the mainstream remains reticent to even seriously address this "theory," they have simultaneously definitively demonstrated that being commercially beholden (addicted) to pharmaceutical advertising money makes them unreasonable to trust (even if they were remotely trusted to begin with.) The government's over-the-top nosedive into social engineering and information control also scoured away any 'trustworthiness' they may have had.
The well-documented history of research into adapting existing non-human viruses kind of spoils their defense of "It's racist to say so!" and "No good scientist would ever do that!" The Wuhan lab has a terrible track record when it comes to 'protocols and safety (look it up.) Add to this the in-your-face line, oft repeated and even offered up as evidentiary testimony "It wasn't 'gain of function research!" and you have to start wondering how they ever thought they could just 'talk their way out of it."
• Ivermectin worked
Apparently, it did. But could you imagine the angst and grief the accountants would have suffered if they 'lost' out on profit? No cheap, easily available, pharmaceutically proved and tested therapy for us... experimental MRNA manipulation ho! More 'product sales' means more profit... mandate that sucker!
• Masks offered no benefit and were harmful
That's not really fair. Masks do have a benefit... just not outside of surgery and hospital infectious disease wards. Most doctors knew this from the get go. Unless you are willing to exchange your used mask for a new one every half hour, and avoid contagion areas, and never - ever - wear one when you're sick... it is all an exercise in futility. Masks were never the blessing they were sold to be... except for investors in the industry. (That and hand sanitizer.)
• Should have never kept kids out of school
True. Children were never a viable vector for this disease. Between the robust nature of their immune responses, and the generally minimized symptoms... we should have allowed what worked for every single other flu to happen again. Shutting down the social lives of children, and subjecting them to 'tele-teaching' was a mistake of huge proportions.
• Natural immunity is better than vaccinated immunity
Up until COVID, vaccines worked to engender the development of "natural" immunity. Now that the definition of 'vaccine' has been changed to include MRNA treatment that is no longer true. Since 'appearances' now matter more than reality... natural immunity is anti-marketing...and thus hate speech.
• Long COVID is often a symptom of long vax
There are many instances of diseases that have manifested in "long lasting" form. That COVID is like that is simply the way of the human body responding to it. The jury is still out regarding post COVID-vaccine effects, and that is largely because technically the COVID "vaccine" is new technology - it is called a vaccine so it could take advantage of existing regulatory frameworks. The fact that they rushed to "change" the definition of the term "Vaccine" says it all.
• Hospitals murdered COVID patients
Again, somewhat unfair. By that same reasoning every hospital 'murders' many people due to their ignorance, worship of "policy," and reliance on "insurance banks" to validate treatment. I have to agree that automatic "intubation" seemed like a practice they should shamed for. Casual intubation is often a precursor to "giving up" on the patient.
• COVID fatality rate and death count were highly inflated
Another reason that the public lost faith in "medical authorities"... some level of collusion was not only present but led to hospitals being "compensated" for identifying COVID cases... and miraculously influenza was rendered extinct once the frenzy of COVID cases reporting was manufactured. But they didn't even flinch at the chance to earn some loyalty dollars.
• Unvaccinated were scapegoated for the failure of the shots
I saw some evidence of the idea that if there was still COVID in the world, it was because people refused the experimental 'vaccine.' But it soon fell apart when they were forced to admit it neither prevented the disease, nor stopped its transmission... so authorities opted for the appearance that they had "saved millions" and rendered the disease a tolerable malady... like it wasn't already.
• Early treatment was suppressed to make way for a “vaccine”
The focus on "vaccine, vaccine, vaccine" was another "in your face" technique used to manufacture an idea that it was the "only way" to 'save us all.' Anything that promised hope beyond that was automatically targeted for attack by the media and the government. Proof of the theory that "money talks."
• Risks of the jab were intentionally hidden from the public
It was easy to ignore the 'risks' because it was an 'emergency' and was an 'experimental' solution. I can only pray that it wasn't as damaging to every recipient as was feared. "Intentionally" is easy to justify when you live by the rule that "the experts" have spoken... (and by experts I mean the appointees and pharma spokespersons who had apparently been elevated into sainthood.
• Vaccine mandates are wrong
I'm not so sure this is a statement that is true at face value. It may be that vaccines are a good thing. "Experimental" treatments shoe-horned into the 'vaccine' designation not so much. But time will tell.
• More shots = more risk of infection
I hadn't heard this assertion before. I hope it's not so, but I wouldn't be surprised if it proves that despite the "doesn't stop the infection, doesn't stop the spread, and only helps when you get it" thing isn't actually a distraction from a depopulation agenda. COVID is a very bad flu. It is most dangerous if your weak, or weakened by other conditions... whether it makes you more likely to suffer the illness itself needs to be proven clinically... has it?
• COVID shots are neither safe nor effective
I characterize the "safe and effective" trope as a cruel joke... it's more like "sudden and unexpected."
There... impulse satisfied...
While I am not a celebrity follower, Mahers comments are mostly on the mark... although I can't say that I agree with everything he said.
