03-16-2024, 05:34 PM
Is it really possible for me to feel comfortable commenting on people who are considered "royal?" I mean, as an American, I can't really relate to the notion that some people are notable and important simply "because they always have been" (as appears usual in the case with royal personages.)
But even so, I know they must face certain realities - in that life - which I might find repugnant, or dubious.
Do we really know who they are? Actually, scratch that, can we actually know anything about them when everyone (even they) 'editorialize' everything said or reported... facts are hard to find in their stories... They may be in there, but it's hit or miss most times as we rely on 'journalists' and 'vested/interested' associates...
My general impression is that Harry is widely perceived to have brought grief to the royal family... but that seems presumptuous... since we don't actually "know" the real Harry.
This 'designation by bloodline' practice never felt 'sound' to me. But that's just me. I'm not British.
But even so, I know they must face certain realities - in that life - which I might find repugnant, or dubious.
Do we really know who they are? Actually, scratch that, can we actually know anything about them when everyone (even they) 'editorialize' everything said or reported... facts are hard to find in their stories... They may be in there, but it's hit or miss most times as we rely on 'journalists' and 'vested/interested' associates...
My general impression is that Harry is widely perceived to have brought grief to the royal family... but that seems presumptuous... since we don't actually "know" the real Harry.
This 'designation by bloodline' practice never felt 'sound' to me. But that's just me. I'm not British.
