Klaus Schwab Resigns from WEF

[UltraBudgie]

The issue seems to be the same as politicians, in my view. Someone steps up to a leadership position to effect change, finds that they may have the knack to get things done locally, gets pushed into doing more and more for larger groups until they find themselves in a dark and difficult situation where it has become corrupted to the point where they cannot walk away.

I don’t remember where I read the story of a ranking politician who was compromised by being forced into doing something absolutely horrific (pedophilia) in order to save their families lives. Then being told that they were now “owned”, and all of their public decisions were going to be given to them.

I may have swerved off topic a tad, but it seems to all be about control. The control mechanism I see is the Young New Leaders of the WEF being the ones that are the candidates for leadership of countries all over the world. (Notice I didn’t say around the globe? Just throwing a bone to our wingnut Flat Earth buddies).

Again I digress, but this is how I see it and I don’t see any change in the future. Wash, rinse and repeat.

Much of the conspiratorial confusion I see seems based on a misperception. That is, that organizations like the WEF are the same as organizations like governments or corporations. They're not. Simplified, there are two "pyramids" at work here. In a corporation, authority flows downward from the executive to the worker, while cohered results and lived narrative flow upward. In these organization, it's the reverse -- all the power is in the individual members, the authority flows upward, and cohered narrative direction occurs at the group level, the "forum", and flows downward. Ironically, this is exactly the type of structure that disempowered workers attempt, unsuccessfully, to unionize to achieve. The two types of organizational pyramids are bound by common membership at the board level, the top of one, the base of another. That's the young leader program. So, in itself, the WEF has no power, but is rather a ground in which the various implementers of power can share their common accumulated narrative contexts, and build an amalgamated larger model of coherent action. That's why they're all about "agendas". They're bottom-up agreements, not top-down dictates.