01-27-2025, 01:28 PM
(01-25-2025, 09:40 PM)MonkMode Wrote: You won’t find anybody other than me asserting that excessive coal burning from the massive mining operations in Tunguska were the cause of that AWESOME FORCE of a blast that dwarves any nuclear blast by immense orders of magnitude.
I read your quote from that study up until they said CO2 emissions were from gasoline power. I don’t see that as a risk because gasoline takes more weight in O2 out of the atmosphere than it adds in CO2. That is actually a risk mitigation IMO, because it decreases the weight of the atmosphere. Though it is not pleasant air to breathe, polluted with car exhaust.
Now burning coal and breathing, those add more weight in CO2, than they take in O2. So those I think to be a climate risk.
Coal mines don't burn coal. This is a very remote and underpopulated region.
How can any of this account for such a massive blast?
I now know why I am called a grown up. Every time I get up I groan.