Yesterday, 10:20 AM
(Yesterday, 10:07 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: What did they lie about? They said that what they were given to look at had all the earmarks of a Russian misinformation campaign. It did. The data presented them was cultivated to make that so. The press then re-interpreted their carefully-worded statement as a declaration that the laptop was Russian misinformation.
They're guilty of not looking too closely, and making an overly circumspect statement that one could easily foresee would be misinterpreted. But that's not a crime. Or even, provably, professional misconduct.
Presenting intelligence that is selectively analyzed and interpreted and laundered through a compliant press to reach a particular conclusion is a tactic that has all the earmarks of a UKUSA misinformation campaign.
Everyone know this. The players and the played alike. It's all kayfabe.
...and those are "top intelligence officials" ? The ones who can't tell what is BS and what is not nor even thought to question it ?
KNOWING that Biden and his family are not quite on the up and up, but still ignored all that to stick up for Hunter ?
Not very intelligent are they ?
Who let the dogs out ? It was me.
