12-20-2024, 03:27 PM
This post was last modified 12-20-2024, 03:28 PM by Maxmars. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: grammar
It's funny... the word anarchy is not exactly right for the intent for which it is usually used.
At first, the idea is most often meant to evoke a sense of chaos and disarray...
But it is usually overlooked that the evoked imagery of "chaos" is only relative to complete and utter imposed control... the kind where individuals are mostly robotically complaint.
Hence, to the "control freaks" in governance (and quasi-governance,) the idea of anarchy is an anathema, a total 'devolution' of all compelled behavior systems.
But anarchy, for what it's worth, is simply complete unfettered freedom to conduct oneself without "governing" constraints.
Anarchy is the recess playground... no adults breathing down one's neck, imposing their preconceived ideas of propriety and order.
The control we seem to embrace is to the existence of the status quo (private banking monopoly, corporate 'patrons' in ownership of the government, class-rule, compliant 'media' for information control, laws restricting citizen inquiry or dissent... etc.)
Frankly, there wouldn't be a problem with banks being dismantled and restructured by the government... if only the banks didn't practically own the government in the first place.
I hope you can understand that the Hegelian approach is only useful to them if THEY are the one's taking action... the one's actually defining the problem.
At first, the idea is most often meant to evoke a sense of chaos and disarray...
But it is usually overlooked that the evoked imagery of "chaos" is only relative to complete and utter imposed control... the kind where individuals are mostly robotically complaint.
Hence, to the "control freaks" in governance (and quasi-governance,) the idea of anarchy is an anathema, a total 'devolution' of all compelled behavior systems.
But anarchy, for what it's worth, is simply complete unfettered freedom to conduct oneself without "governing" constraints.
Anarchy is the recess playground... no adults breathing down one's neck, imposing their preconceived ideas of propriety and order.
The control we seem to embrace is to the existence of the status quo (private banking monopoly, corporate 'patrons' in ownership of the government, class-rule, compliant 'media' for information control, laws restricting citizen inquiry or dissent... etc.)
Frankly, there wouldn't be a problem with banks being dismantled and restructured by the government... if only the banks didn't practically own the government in the first place.
I hope you can understand that the Hegelian approach is only useful to them if THEY are the one's taking action... the one's actually defining the problem.
