12-13-2024, 02:48 PM
"Follow the money" has always made the most sense to me.
Look at those companies, their major shareholders and their executive board members
What a gig though right? All research into new drugs gets paid via public funding, research grants (again, public funding) and "awareness campaigns". Think Pink!
You have research labs set up at universities for the work to begin yet you Own any results (at no cost to you mind you. Maybe an endowment or kickback of sorts) and when something comes to fruition, you manufacture in 3rd-world countries, set up global sales and supply chains and charge excessive amounts of money for a pill.
FDA? HA! Brokers and middle-men. They have no labs. No research capabilities. No staff=scientists or testing. It's all outsourced!
Most of the time the "trials and testing" is done BY THE COMPANY MAKING THE PRODUCT. No conflicts though, right?
Look at those companies, their major shareholders and their executive board members
What a gig though right? All research into new drugs gets paid via public funding, research grants (again, public funding) and "awareness campaigns". Think Pink!
You have research labs set up at universities for the work to begin yet you Own any results (at no cost to you mind you. Maybe an endowment or kickback of sorts) and when something comes to fruition, you manufacture in 3rd-world countries, set up global sales and supply chains and charge excessive amounts of money for a pill.
FDA? HA! Brokers and middle-men. They have no labs. No research capabilities. No staff=scientists or testing. It's all outsourced!
Most of the time the "trials and testing" is done BY THE COMPANY MAKING THE PRODUCT. No conflicts though, right?
