UFOs And Stopped Clocks

[quintessentone]

 Found it interesting how the motor-vehicle's headlamps were said to be 'lighting up in rhythm with the pulsated light from the object' (as that's not the first time that's been reported) and there's a document here compiled by Antonio Rullán examining eyewitness testimonies taken from Newell E. Wright, Pedro Saucedo, Ronald Martin, James Long, Jim Wheeler, Jose Alvarez and Frank Williams.

Mentioned dams in the previous post and saw that there was also a.case from one year later (Loch Raven Dam) with very similar aspects involving a large, flat egg-shaped object, EM effects on the car and witness burns.

Some pertinent info on this page and do have a lot of respect for Dr Mcdonald as he debunked a lot of the 'absurdly erroneous' Bluebook explanations whilst working for the Office of Naval Intelligence - here he is alluding to the Levelland cases whilst also bringing up 'stopped clocks'.
Don' 't know if you'd be interested in it but thought there was a good vid below breaking down his 'war' with infamous UFO debunker (and covert NSA/CIA operative) Donald Howard Menzel.

It also covers how Dr McDonald discovered that in many official UFO explanations "there was almost no correlation between so-called 'evaluations and explanations' that are made by Bluebook and the facts of the case."

Dr. Mcdonald also said or noted this:

" He noted that the vast majority of UFOs could become Identified flying objects, and, in his estimation, only about 1% of UFOs were true "unknowns".

"There is no sensible alternative to the utterly shocking hypothesis that UFOs are extraterrestrial probes".

"the scientific world at large is in for a shock when it becomes aware of the astonishing nature of the UFO phenomenon and its bewildering complexity. I make that terse comment well aware that it invites easy ridicule; but intellectual honesty demands that I make clear that my two years' study convinces me that in the UFO problem lie scientific and technological questions that will challenge the ability of the world's outstanding scientists to explain - as soon as they start examining the facts. [...] the scientific community [...] has been casually ignoring as nonsense a matter of extraordinary scientific importance."

"UFOs are entirely real and we do not know what they are, because we have laughed them out of court. The possibility that these are extraterrestrial devices, that we are dealing with surveillance from some advanced technology, is a possibility I take very seriously". (Wikipedia)

I agree with the good doctor, in that, the scientists need to first determine what is evidence/fact then examine that in detail.

I think we need to look at all logical explanations, scientific or otherwise because I know they are here and have been for a very long time, but I want concrete evidence.

As for stopped clocks, car engine issues etc. I am still on what elements are in those devices that may conduct electromagnetic or other forces that may interfere with their operation.

A car is a conductor of electricity, a video on a car's alternator and electromagnetic induction:



Damp weather and cold weather are known to affect batteries. Perhaps that is why the good doctor was focused on the moisture levels in the atmosphere (?)  There is so much that can affect the components of a car's engine and power systems.

If the good doctor said that he believed only 1% of UFOs are unknown, then let's first determine the known then eliminate it, at least, that's where my head's at with this right now.

So if we are to believe the 1% of unknown UFOs are indeed extraterrestial probes, then whatever tech they use to probe (i.e. lights, beams, magnetic fields etc.) should be looked at more closely. They should be looking at the light/beam colors, radioactivity, magnetic field etc.  How they do that, I just don't know, I am not a scientist. It may turn out we don't have the knowledge nor technology to figure this out.