12-04-2024, 05:16 PM
This post was last modified 12-04-2024, 05:21 PM by UltraBudgie. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: There was one instance where I did not hyphenate "aspect-ratio", and that bothered me.
 
(12-04-2024, 11:19 AM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: The funny sign in Colorado in the middle of nowhere.
I am greatly disturbed by the difference in the pixel aspect-ratio of those two pictures. In one, the "V"-shaped symbol at the top of the sign forms a less than 90-degree angle, and in the other, the angle is clearly greater than 90-degrees. Please be more considerate of those of us who may have some OCD-tendencies.
This is in no way helped by a recent forum upgrade, which I will now complain about. One used to be able to specify an image tag in several ways, two of which were the usual "[img]url[/img]" and with width and height "[img=640x480]url[/img]", for example. The latter form would allow one to adjust the aspect ratio of an image. However, recently it seems the height specified is now ignored, and the original aspect-ratio of the image will be preserved regardless. So "[img=640x2000]url[/img]" gives the same results as specifying a height of 480. One would think that specifying only a width should work to do that, such as "[img=640]url[/img]", but nope, it doesn't. The improved click-image-to-zoom is great, and I think the upgrade is generally worth it, but I miss the ability to correct aspect-ratio.
Thank you for listening to my sperging. I will now provide this for everyone who needs one:
"I cannot give you what you deny yourself. Look for solutions from within." - Kai Opaka