11-27-2024, 07:13 AM
That manner of writing and "reporting" seems way over the top, worthy of needing half a dozen or more citations of authenticity. All I can respond to are my own experiences, what I was imparted with/to and sixty years of coming to terms. I have a several-page paper that I wrote back in about 1968 for myself and for Dr. Leo Sprinkle, former head of the Philosophy department at the University of Wyoming. He deeply worked with survivors of UFO "events." This was long before PTSD became a household word. _--Which, as far as I know, has never been correctly applied to people having had intense UFO encounters. My paper was entitled "Mental Health and the UFO Experiencer." --We are veterans and should be suing the government for not protecting us and for their constant lies in regard to the interactions they have with the ETs.
My views may be dated for I do not follow any of the material or shenanigans going on in the field. It is a mixed of the wild and controlled, rarely seen as a gestalt upon humanity itself which it exactly is. About all a lay person can do today is to watch the movie Close Encounters... and absorb the individual truths found therein, and to reject nothing it suggests.
My views may be dated for I do not follow any of the material or shenanigans going on in the field. It is a mixed of the wild and controlled, rarely seen as a gestalt upon humanity itself which it exactly is. About all a lay person can do today is to watch the movie Close Encounters... and absorb the individual truths found therein, and to reject nothing it suggests.
Intelligence seeks to proliferate itself
not necessarily via its own kind.
not necessarily via its own kind.
