11-13-2024, 08:35 AM
Here is the link I found that seems to have the most people in it (about 1000 right now). Hearing start at 11:30am EST.
Space.com has warmed up telling us who we should find credible or not:
I am looking forward to talking about this hearing about how to talk about this phenomena. There will certainly be one or two interesting tidbits, and perhaps movement signalling acceptable ways to reframe discussion. Hopefully someone will actually ask what 'multidimensional' indicates in practice.
It would also be nice to hear the distinction made between evidence of technology as far as our capability of explanation, non-functional material technolgy evidence, functional but inoperable technology, operable but non-replicable technology, and replicable technology efforts and successes. There's a broad spectrum, only some of which is of active national security concern.
Space.com has warmed up telling us who we should find credible or not:
Quote:"The cover-up and disinformation campaign has been so successful that most scientists do not even know UAP are real," Elizondo wrote in his 2024 book "Imminent." The book also claims that four "deceased nonhuman bodies" were recovered from the infamous 1947 crash in Roswell, New Mexico and that "China and Russia do not have the same stigma and can employ their scientists to work on this topic for them."
Elizondo has also claimed firsthand knowledge of U.S. programs that employ individuals with psychic powers to "remote view" distant locations. Most recently, the former counterintelligence officer held a paid event where a photo was shown that Elizondo claimed was a "real photo" of a "mothership" UFO above a U.S. embassy. Within days, the photo was found to be the reflection of a lamp in a window.
The House hearing will also include Tim Gallaudet, a retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral who unidentified submersible objects, arguing that "these underwater anomalies jeopardize US maritime security." Gallaudet has also told interviewers that his daughter is a "medium" who can communicate with spirits.
https://www.space.com/space-exploration/...w-to-watch
I am looking forward to talking about this hearing about how to talk about this phenomena. There will certainly be one or two interesting tidbits, and perhaps movement signalling acceptable ways to reframe discussion. Hopefully someone will actually ask what 'multidimensional' indicates in practice.
It would also be nice to hear the distinction made between evidence of technology as far as our capability of explanation, non-functional material technolgy evidence, functional but inoperable technology, operable but non-replicable technology, and replicable technology efforts and successes. There's a broad spectrum, only some of which is of active national security concern.
