11-11-2024, 11:49 AM
I get the overall harmony between the 9/11 details being 'restrained' and the information control in the entire "UFO" topic.
It speaks to me, of an overall inclination to 'posture' by the government... that their assumed "authority" and "wisdom" justifies the channeling or outright sequestering of information that 'someone' in their group can designate as "dangerous" or "provocative."
In that direction of thought comes the notion that we, the public, need to be protected from truth.
But the actions seem to telegraph that it is not "the public" that's being protected... but someone else is.
It speaks to me, of an overall inclination to 'posture' by the government... that their assumed "authority" and "wisdom" justifies the channeling or outright sequestering of information that 'someone' in their group can designate as "dangerous" or "provocative."
In that direction of thought comes the notion that we, the public, need to be protected from truth.
But the actions seem to telegraph that it is not "the public" that's being protected... but someone else is.