10-04-2024, 07:41 PM
This post was last modified 10-04-2024, 07:41 PM by Maxmars.
Edit Reason: grammar
With all respect.
While this conversation has evolved naturally, I would like to point out that it has drifted from the topic to something else.
No one is necessarily strictly "off topic," but much of the last entries are about something other than the actual topic of an accusation of a potential shoot-down.
Motivations and the political gaming behind the accusation is relevant, but not precisely "on point."
I would suggest another thread to discuss the antecedents of the allegation...
(And I would like to hope that the conflict between the 'information" (reporting) of NATO-members' statements, and the antagonists becomes central to that discussion.)
This is just a suggestion from me (MaxMars)... and not a "moderator" action or criticism.
While this conversation has evolved naturally, I would like to point out that it has drifted from the topic to something else.
No one is necessarily strictly "off topic," but much of the last entries are about something other than the actual topic of an accusation of a potential shoot-down.
Motivations and the political gaming behind the accusation is relevant, but not precisely "on point."
I would suggest another thread to discuss the antecedents of the allegation...
(And I would like to hope that the conflict between the 'information" (reporting) of NATO-members' statements, and the antagonists becomes central to that discussion.)
This is just a suggestion from me (MaxMars)... and not a "moderator" action or criticism.
