09-14-2024, 09:19 AM
I've actually been well aware for quite some time now the threat of consequence using deadly force in defense of oneself and would likely be one of my first thoughts at the outset of any such situation.
And because of the above my ideology would be to avoid deadly confrontations at all costs if possible. I'm the type that will be looking for mitigating resolutions when/if something begins brewing in whatever form it may take. I have no desire at all to "take the Nestea plunge" into the never-ending shitstorm of beaurocracy and red tape with uncertain outcomes i.e. the judicial system.
The guidelines vary by state. In my state I'm vaguely familiar with the castle doctrine which I presume is why some people jokingly say that if you shoot someone on your property make sure you drag them into your house("castle") before calling the cops.
I've also heard that when threatened with aggravated/elevated violence within your own dwelling(e.g. stranger danger) that you should "retreat" and call 911, and this particular type of scenario just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
And because of the above my ideology would be to avoid deadly confrontations at all costs if possible. I'm the type that will be looking for mitigating resolutions when/if something begins brewing in whatever form it may take. I have no desire at all to "take the Nestea plunge" into the never-ending shitstorm of beaurocracy and red tape with uncertain outcomes i.e. the judicial system.
The guidelines vary by state. In my state I'm vaguely familiar with the castle doctrine which I presume is why some people jokingly say that if you shoot someone on your property make sure you drag them into your house("castle") before calling the cops.
I've also heard that when threatened with aggravated/elevated violence within your own dwelling(e.g. stranger danger) that you should "retreat" and call 911, and this particular type of scenario just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
