02-02-2026, 08:02 PM
(02-02-2026, 07:09 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: reasonable. however that quoted article makes this statement:
it says that 'contradicts'. no it does not. all three of those things can be true. although i haven't seen conclusive evidence of the last claim, but i suspect it is true. it can both be an unjustified bad shoot, and also something that he deserved and his actions indicate he was seeking out, can't it?
Rand Paul quote:
Quote:“I saw no evidence of him assaulting the police,”
Noem quote:
Quote:called Pretti a “domestic terrorist” and claimed he wanted to “inflict maximum damage on individuals and kill law enforcement"
No assault vs " inflict maximum damage on individuals and kill law enforcement"
Its clear they were either watching an entirely different event, or one of them was just making stuff up to sound dramatic.
Trump has a way of bringing out the Sean Spicer in everyone that works for him.
