12-10-2025, 04:39 PM
It kind of pains me to admit... I have many, misgivings about the "mRNA" tech jab, and my wife's subsequent decline and death.
I admit the proximity of it, and the magnitude of my loss is what kept me from going "full activist" on the constant flow of confident assertions about how "science" "speaks."
The entire thing was a problem. The "OH MY GOD WE MIGHT ALL DIE" pump from the initial media...
.. and with stunning control of focus - completely 'obliviate' the standing fact that "NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW WHAT WILL COME OF THIS WORLD-WIDE EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY-ALTERING MRNA 'TECH,' OR WHAT IT WILL ACTUALLY DO." ... but the pharma-tech model says this is almost "a cure?" Furthermore, indemnity all round as this is a "global crisis."
Bad enough?
How about an actual, bone fide, documented, affirmative governance strategy of oppression against dissent to the experiment?... even public speech was ALL virtue oriented support - offset by the absence of dissent that wasn't "anti-science" irrationality... it became a painfully clear echo of the same pressures that some Germans/Soviets/Chinese...(need I go on?) faced as their "regimes" mounted virtue attacks... on the easiest target around.
Nah... still "science has spoken?"
OK... let's actually and directly hire "influencers" to promote ridicule and "physical harm" expression against the "unvaccinateed" ... they themselves had the real numbers to "craft the scripts"... but they did not use the numbers... they reported according the the desired effect the "right numbers" should be (an activism tactic - except they usually aren't so obvious.)
Let's engage "contracted" "services" to actually persecute and harass dissenters online... That should help them to understand that "science has spoken."
Still OK with the "moral and logical imperative to observe a lie told because "science" has spoken?
In the COVID event.... and still today - because the interests it served remain absolved - while the did say (in general) "the science has spoken...." they were "incomplete"... and thus
"We" have "some science" here that "speaks" ... "No, no!, Don't unpack that!"
Not one thing that elicited inquiry, contradiction, or even explored hesitancy was tolerated... this was not a public position... this was a "media/government" combine position.... I saw that at once.
Once such a relationship exists between a government constantly struggling to be "of the people" and a cathedral of "appearances"... the first to die is information. People like me (crazy) often mention that these are ALSO the same people (the one's who lie to our faces as with the COVID event) who are the custodians of tomorrow's history... (an unholy union increased in magnitude.)
Paranoid much? Not really.... mostly this has been "in the human works" for centuries... and they fail, and they fail. and they fail again. One might opine... They suck.
Were I sitting in that well appointed room, (my theoretical "6 guys in a room") in an observer's chair in the corner... I would be the asshole who inappropriately says out loud... "Are you guys learning yet?"
I admit the proximity of it, and the magnitude of my loss is what kept me from going "full activist" on the constant flow of confident assertions about how "science" "speaks."
The entire thing was a problem. The "OH MY GOD WE MIGHT ALL DIE" pump from the initial media...
.. and with stunning control of focus - completely 'obliviate' the standing fact that "NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW WHAT WILL COME OF THIS WORLD-WIDE EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY-ALTERING MRNA 'TECH,' OR WHAT IT WILL ACTUALLY DO." ... but the pharma-tech model says this is almost "a cure?" Furthermore, indemnity all round as this is a "global crisis."
Bad enough?
How about an actual, bone fide, documented, affirmative governance strategy of oppression against dissent to the experiment?... even public speech was ALL virtue oriented support - offset by the absence of dissent that wasn't "anti-science" irrationality... it became a painfully clear echo of the same pressures that some Germans/Soviets/Chinese...(need I go on?) faced as their "regimes" mounted virtue attacks... on the easiest target around.
Nah... still "science has spoken?"
OK... let's actually and directly hire "influencers" to promote ridicule and "physical harm" expression against the "unvaccinateed" ... they themselves had the real numbers to "craft the scripts"... but they did not use the numbers... they reported according the the desired effect the "right numbers" should be (an activism tactic - except they usually aren't so obvious.)
Let's engage "contracted" "services" to actually persecute and harass dissenters online... That should help them to understand that "science has spoken."
Still OK with the "moral and logical imperative to observe a lie told because "science" has spoken?
In the COVID event.... and still today - because the interests it served remain absolved - while the did say (in general) "the science has spoken...." they were "incomplete"... and thus
"We" have "some science" here that "speaks" ... "No, no!, Don't unpack that!"
Not one thing that elicited inquiry, contradiction, or even explored hesitancy was tolerated... this was not a public position... this was a "media/government" combine position.... I saw that at once.
Once such a relationship exists between a government constantly struggling to be "of the people" and a cathedral of "appearances"... the first to die is information. People like me (crazy) often mention that these are ALSO the same people (the one's who lie to our faces as with the COVID event) who are the custodians of tomorrow's history... (an unholy union increased in magnitude.)
Paranoid much? Not really.... mostly this has been "in the human works" for centuries... and they fail, and they fail. and they fail again. One might opine... They suck.
Were I sitting in that well appointed room, (my theoretical "6 guys in a room") in an observer's chair in the corner... I would be the asshole who inappropriately says out loud... "Are you guys learning yet?"
